Uber/Lyft are weird. It's basically VC-subsidized transportation.
Is it even profitable to drive for them when assuming realistic (i.e. at least $0.50/km) vehicle costs?
(how is the cost per ride calculated?)
I do have some suspicion that it may have been calculated by just dividing revenue by number of rides and comparing that to average fare. But again, haven't looked into it.
As shown in Exhibit 2, for the year ending September 2015, Uber had GAAP losses of $2 billion on revenue of $1.4 billion, a negative 143% profit margin. Thus Uber’s current operations depend on $2 billion in subsidies, funded out of the $13 billion in cash its investors have provided.
Uber passengers were paying only 41% of the actual cost of their trips; Uber was using these massive subsidies to undercut the fares and provide more capacity than the competitors who had to cover 100% of their costs out of passenger fares.
Many other tech startups lost money as they pursued growth and market share, but losses of this magnitude are unprecedented; in its worst-ever four quarters, in 2000, Amazon had a negative 50% margin, losing $1.4 billion on $2.8 billion in revenue, and the company responded by firing more than 15 percent of its workforce.[4] 2015 was Uber’s fifth year of operations; at that point in its history Facebook was achieving 25% profit margins.[5]
So is this treating the cost to acquire new riders/drivers as a ride cost?It just looks at Uber's profits, not the profit margin of the drivers.....
(and just for that one period of time)
At driving expenses being ~50%, does that cover budgeting cost of replacement vehicle, or is it largely capitalizing depreciation?
It's by time & by miles plus a base fare.I'm sure it's based on cost/mile and average miles/ride.
Cost/mile is going to be different for everyone, simplest way is to just use what the IRS uses, which was 53.5 cents per mile in 2017.
So Uber/Lyft are subsidized by the Viet-Cong?Uber/Lyft are weird. It's basically VC-subsidized transportation.
They have a max age? Eeeewwww. That says uncomplimentary things about the company and the customer base.
Right about the depreciation. If you're at all handy though, there's profit to be had in extracting value out of depreciation. The car is going to depreciate anyways. If you can get about 100,000 to 150,000 service miles out of it, once you account for routine maintenance, fuel, and (increasing) repair(self-labor ameliorated), you can take the cost of replacing it(dunno, 10k - 20k ish for a commuter car with over 100,000mi left in it, right-ish?), you can ballpark about how much per mile you need to budget to replace. If you aren't budgeting to replace, and you're operating extra miles on the vehicle just for the cash, then you're essentially just pulling whatever cash you can out of the depreciation, right? I mean, you can live off of depreciation for a long time, depending, especially if you're comfortable with your equipment. I'd call it something complimentary, like being business-minded or skilled or thrifty, or something.
I mean, right? You both do this differently than I do, you have neat takes on it.
So Uber/Lyft are subsidized by the Viet-Cong?
Being a car mechanic is a fine thing, but not the same as ubering and being able to patch and bead a tire.
Uber and Lyft both love to cheat their drivers by charging customers surge prices then telling the drivers it was a normal faire allowing the company to pocket the difference. Seriously, it is a horrible job and with a slight amount of effort you can get a far better one.