Bad scientists: you have given bad info on global warming

Status
Not open for further replies.
I love you too, Abey.
 
Gawd, yer a twit. Why, for the luv of god, did you respond to the troll?

This post has just won Abegweit the "Most Ironic Post of 2011" award.
 
Yeah, I guess the Thought Police must be getting lazy.
 
Funny, Tuvalu, Kiribati and the Maldives don't consider it "bullcrap".
So what?? I was talking Third World nations in general. Sure, look hard enough and you'll find an exception somewhere. Oh, and by the way? I'm familiar with the fact that the Maldives are worried about global warming because they're slowly disappearing underwater. To which I say, good. I call that justice from God (even though I'm an atheist, how's that for irony?). Because the Maldives government REQUIRES you to be a Muslim in order to be a citizen, so I hope that whole country vanishes off the map, enough to lose control of my typing and start writing comma splices.

Also, you know the slight increase in Antarctic ice is despite
That's--

:dubious:

Wait--did you say Antartctic ice is increasing?? You didn't make a typo in there or anything???


I'd appreciate it if
Dude? You called me a whore earlier in the thread. So you have no right to ask anything of me. Ever.

Bloody pillock. :mad:

Isn't Venus widely regarded as a positive feedback loop (oceans boiled off, atmosphere became dense, runaway climate change, hot enough to melt lead and crush submarines on the surface)?
Not really. Venus is closer to the sun and gets 50% more solar radiation, its day is a hundred and fifteen Earth days long, and it has a very weak magnetic field. Venus was destined to bake pretty much from the start--and life never really had a chance.

Of more interest and less alarm for this thread is the apparently contradictory fact that Venus has a vastly greater greenhouse effect than Earth (by literally hundreds of thousands of times!) yet is only three times hotter than Earth. The perfect demonstration of diminishing returns. As we pump more and more greenhouse gases into our own atmosphere, the Earth will warm up less and less with each additional unit of gas.
 
I am surprised that Abegweit hasn't been disappeared yet. The statists are everywhere, after all.

The only forces of darkness I see coming are energy conservationists pleading with us to turn out the lights when we're not using them. ;)

Spoiler :
Rash's log: Either I'm feeling too clever about myself or I seem to be developing an ability to make multiple responses simultaneously with the same words.
 
That's--

:dubious:

Wait--did you say Antartctic ice is increasing?? You didn't make a typo in there or anything???

This is Bill O'Rielly logic right here. Aggressive arrogant ignorance. "I don't understand it, therefore it's wrong."
 
So what?? I was talking Third World nations in general. Sure, look hard enough and you'll find an exception somewhere. Oh, and by the way? I'm familiar with the fact that the Maldives are worried about global warming because they're slowly disappearing underwater. To which I say, good. I call that justice from God (even though I'm an atheist, how's that for irony?). Because the Maldives government REQUIRES you to be a Muslim in order to be a citizen, so I hope that whole country vanishes off the map, enough to lose control of my typing and start writing comma splices.

Do you hope that just the government disappears under the ocean, or all of the people that disagree with that living in the Maldives disappear, too?

What about other island nations with less silly governments?
 
And actually, the same sort of buffoonish ignorance is evident in the comments regarding all the coastal and island nations being "a few exceptions". Funny that they might be worried.
 
Dude? You called me a whore earlier in the thread. So you have no right to ask anything of me. Ever.

Bloody pillock. :mad:
I did no such thing.

Here's the times I have used the word "whore" in this forum.

http://forums.civfanatics.com/search.php?searchid=1558209

None of them addressed to you.

I'll make it easy for you. Here are all my post from this thread (including ones not addressed to you):
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10174764&postcount=217
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10178254&postcount=223
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10181521&postcount=228
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10188665&postcount=243
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10202191&postcount=297
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10221285&postcount=325
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10221370&postcount=327
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10221439&postcount=329
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10221497&postcount=331
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10221555&postcount=334
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10225958&postcount=361
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10273173&postcount=405
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10275262&postcount=410
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=10278667&postcount=419

Now in which one of these did I call you a whore or any kind of name for that matter?

It seems you are mistaken again. But knowing you, you'll be willing to admit your mistake, since you always do, and apologize over your little outburst there knowing you called the wrong guy a "Bloody pillock" and accused him of something he didn't do.

Second, after seeing your mistake, I'm sure you'll also still apologize for putting my name to an argument you can see I never made. Oddly enough sparking an unexpected outburst. Doers it hurt you so badly every time I point out the flaws in your argument you're reduced to that? What was that rule you once stated: "Anyone who calls the other an idiot in an argument automatically loses the argument". See, I do read your posts. What if someone calls someone a "pillock" for no good reason? Surely that is losing the argument in a big way? But I have an addage to that rule. Anyone who apologizes after he did so, shows he's mature enough to be exempt from that rule. I wonder if you can cease from the pissing contest mentality and actually be that man. I'd be impressed and I'd forget about your outburst.

Finally, a reiteration that it's ironic for someone bashing other for not reading your posts, you'd make two mistakes in a row regarding the contents of my posts. A little introspection wouldn't hurt there BasketCase.

edit: By the way, the apology doesn't have to be public. If you'd like to save face I'd accept one in a PM since it's a personal matter to me.
 
Pfft, facts. Facts can be used to prove anything.
 
The denialists (some of whom call themselves 'undecidalist' :lol:) are really getting frisky in this thread, aren't they? Very :popcorn:

Not that it makes their arguments any better - just more entertaining! :D

But we could do with a little less name-calling... where are the moderators when you need them....?
 
Bint: sl. n. a woman, a girl
 
Well, if this spark of outrage was caused by BC misinterpreting my post, it's rather lukewarm business as usual.

edit: This is where I got the term from: "Look...you can't proclaim yourself king just because some moistend bint lobbed a scimitar at you." -Monty Python, Holy Grail
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom