would archaeology by enabled for that mod? they did say one of three groups were north african, so it's possible it could be just for the scenario (or a full civ and used for the scenario)
Well...I'm convinced. I feel like Morocco was the strongest African candidate aside from Kongo. And the interviewee wouldn't just pull that out of thin air.
I think there are several possibilities. I agree with cultural, but scientific could be a possibility if they would represent the moors in iberian peninsula too. Another possibility is trade related with in mind the gold, salt and slavery trade routes.
I'm going to say that Morocco was always a likely candidate, so this could be a slip that they're in. However, it's far too vague to be sure and we shouldn't read too much into it.
That being said, let the speculation begin
Morocco
Leader -
UU -
UU/B/I -
UA -
Well...I'm convinced. I feel like Morocco was the strongest African candidate aside from Kongo. And the interviewee wouldn't just pull that out of thin air.
agreed. obviously, to bring up the "confirmed" debate from the Zulu thread, Morocco cannot be considered confirmed but for me the question is now the last three Civs
as for the leader, either Idris I (who unified the tribes and introduced Islam) or Ismail ibn Sharif (who was a military leader of some repute and established Moroccan independence of the Ottomans)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.