To continue your not so good analogy, it is only a game to those who are playing; to the designer, the creation process was just a task.So programming a computer game where you know the moves of all future participants?
To continue your not so good analogy, it is only a game to those who are playing; to the designer, the creation process was just a task.So programming a computer game where you know the moves of all future participants?
Why is there no programmer that good? Technically from your perspective the game runs itself. Is this universe not a good enough example of a well planned out existence? Is there no programming that good either? This is not an argument for design, if it already exist. It is the ability to determine that this universe has a code that we have barely been exposed to.So obviously no programmer is that good. But on some level a lot of games exist in which if you asked a programmer: "If the princess is still in the brown castle and the player is level 5, where is the goblin?", he'll say: "Hold on I'll check my code"
I can't speak for the universe as a whole, but if life on earth is planned, it is about as badly planned as you can get. Way too many mass extinctions for starters. And at the other end of the scale, human aging wasn't planned at all.Why is there no programmer that good? Technically from your perspective the game runs itself. Is this universe not a good enough example of a well planned out existence? Is there no programming that good either? This is not an argument for design, if it already exist. It is the ability to determine that this universe has a code that we have barely been exposed to.
Why is there no programmer that good?
I can't speak for the universe as a whole, but if life on earth is planned, it is about as badly planned as you can get. Way too many mass extinctions for starters. And at the other end of the scale, human aging wasn't planned at all.
If it is a game, then we are not playing; we (humans) are just events in someone/thing's entertainment. Act Five bosses as it were.Would you like to play a game that is rigid and scripted, or one that evolves as it is being played?
If it is a game, then we are not playing; we (humans) are just events in someone/thing's entertainment. Act Five bosses as it were.
If we were players, we would have been in from the start. If we were players, as I said, at the macro level, mass extinctions point to lack of planning and clear evidence we are not players. If we narrow the scope to make us players, then misery is the winner and there is no ctrl S. Hard Core for all. Like I said, its a bad analogy.
If it is a game, then we are not playing; we (humans) are just events in someone/thing's entertainment. Act Five bosses as it were.
If we were players, we would have been in from the start. If we were players, as I said, at the macro level, mass extinctions point to lack of planning and clear evidence we are not players. If we narrow the scope to make us players, then misery is the winner and there is no ctrl S. Hard Core for all. Like I said, its a bad analogy.
Hinduism and Sufism at their finest! I approve.Bad analogy for who? God would be the player. However humans are the vr players representing God's actions from inside the game.
The separation is why I think the analogy fails.If you want to be an entity separate from God, then I suppose you will never enjoy the analogy. God cannot enjoy it either if no one plays the game as scripted, or does God enjoy it despite the reluctance of the vr representatives? Or is the analogy limited because we favor our own imaginations?