Blowback

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ah cheers. How long a time period was it over?
50-60, it does not count a bunch of other things, but we do not count private American investment either and I know which of those things play out to greater effect over time... I fudging own Samsung and LG stock... so...
 
are you ok? I don't recall you being this ignorant in your behavior last time I was trolling around.

South Korea supported gansterismo military fascism in the North. None of that was OUR (the US) fudging business. How insanely clear that is looking back now can only be denied by people who were so brain addled by corporate American propaganda to believe that commune-based rice farmers in Korea were going to end American life as they knew it, or the people who were directly involved in turning america into a permanent war economy. Academically it's not a question of what happened anymore, now comes that long slow part where the reality of behavior of the american elite slowly filters down to the population. The Cold War will not make America look good. We were fudging awful in behavior for fudging awful reasons, and the entire population bought it hook, line, and sinker. Like I said earlier, at least they good roads and schools... my generation is going homeless and killing themselves while the same elite (and their fudging kids) continue this nightmare around the world in our names.
It took 7 pages to get to the heart of the matter.
 
If you click on your second link, you will find this:

Which countries receive the most foreign aid?

Since World War II, $960 billion, or over quarter of all US foreign aid, has gone to five countries: Israel ($312.5 billion), former South Vietnam ($184.5 billion), Egypt ($183.7 billion), Afghanistan ($158.9 billion), and South Korea ($120.7 billion), after adjusting for inflation.

Followed by a nice graph. 25% to these five countries means 75% to other countries. And of that $120 billion to ROK, $30 billion was sent in 2018-2020. That leaves $90 billion spread over 78 years.
Does this damage my 120 billion vs 10 billion point somehow? and again I'm not here about this argument per se. It is fine that the US finally got around to helping the South Koreans get on their feet. My base link was jsut to point out how silly doing the tit for tat nonsense can be on this level. So, the Soviets helped N. Korea out and supported communist parties in the region and we did the opposite in the south. You know what the Soviets and Chinese didn't do? Level all of South and more of North Korea in an effort to push bomb building and crush unions back in their homelands, while pushing the "freedom loving america" propaganda. All we do is prop up dictators for stock returns it seems to me these days, I jsut thought it was different for a while after WWII.
 
It took 7 pages to get to the heart of the matter.
I thought I posted my intentions up front man, in replies to you actually, and in my first post...
 
I thought I posted my intentions up front man, in replies to you actually, and in my first post...
You were most explicit and focused without any distractive details in the post I quoted. :)
 
my English is not that complicated to deduce ı was claiming it was a conspiracy to make me lose an argument or something .
Yeah what do you expect trying to set the record straight on Korea and the civil war? It’s misdirection and racism tits to toes.
 
I thought I posted my intentions up front man, in replies to you actually, and in my first post...
I’m sorry you had to go through this, but I hope you learned something.
 
I’m sorry you had to go through this, but I hope you learned something.
Well not learned so much as recalled that my reluctance to put people on ignore can be very annoying sometimes when I find their takes inhuman and repugnant. It is still good for me to read them, so I am not "stuck in my bubble". I was hoping for a boomer on old gen xer might have some insight on why they bought into the narrative of evil soviets so hard... I mean I go back and read and listen to the propaganda and it's so childish in its expressions and so clearly manufactured nonsense looking at it now. I think that it is the twenty-year war on terror propaganda veterancy that makes me look at the Red Scare commuphobia propaganda like it's a bad N. Korean movie trying to emulate Hollywood. It is sad because it has had devastating effects on the planet overall and obviously the nation sin which civil wars got turned into US "police actions". It also was very deleterious here in the mindset of the US and how we personally view labor and capital. It is so brain broken here all the way to the top echelons of power. I've heard more than a few voices calling union organizers "evil" and "anti-american". Which is patently absurd.
 
Not to bicker about the topic over all but you know... North Korea benefitted from billions of dollars (curent equivalent numbers here) for about ten years. South received over 100 billion in aid and obviously no sanctions or embargoes for stupid reasons.
I don’t see it as bickering to find the facts as to why the two Koreas are so economically divergent. I don’t think your figures are accurate, but I don’t have the time right now (work day) to look them all up and properly source them.

As another part that is a little harder to calculate, the Soviets often bought goods at prices above-market rates and sold goods to allied nations at a subsidy: this was true in the case of Cuba, with the Soviets purchasing Cuban sugarcane above market rates and selling them oil on the cheap. In effect, this becomes a kind of foreign aid that is not reflected in official aid data.
 
Does this damage my 120 billion vs 10 billion point somehow? and again I'm not here about this argument per se. It is fine that the US finally got around to helping the South Koreans get on their feet. My base link was jsut to point out how silly doing the tit for tat nonsense can be on this level. So, the Soviets helped N. Korea out and supported communist parties in the region and we did the opposite in the south. You know what the Soviets and Chinese didn't do? Level all of South and more of North Korea in an effort to push bomb building and crush unions back in their homelands, while pushing the "freedom loving america" propaganda. All we do is prop up dictators for stock returns it seems to me these days, I jsut thought it was different for a while after WWII.

120 billion os pocket change over tge tinefrane involved.

. It's not even a modest tax cut here in NZ and we are a lot smaller and poorer than SK.
 
120 billion os pocket change over tge tinefrane involved.

. It's not even a modest tax cut here in NZ and we are a lot smaller and poorer than SK.
  • New Zealand Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per Capita reached 47,046.412 USD in Mar 2023, compared with 48,812.703 USD in Mar 2022.
  • New Zealand GDP Per Capita data is updated yearly, available from Mar 1961 to Mar 2023, with an average number of 13,450.383 USD.
  • The data reached an all-time high of 48,812.703 USD in Mar 2022 and a record low of 1,663.461 in Mar 1961.
  • CEIC converts annual GDP per Capita into USD. Statistics New Zealand provides GDP per Capita in local currency. Federal Reserve Board average market exchange rate is used for currency conversions. GDP per Capita prior to 1992 is sourced from the World Bank. GDP per Capita is in annual frequency, ending in March of each year.
New Zealand Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per Capita reached 47,046.412 USD in Mar 2023, compared with 48,812.703 USD in Mar 2022.
  • South Korea Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per Capita reached 32,236.800 USD in Dec 2022, compared with 34,983.700 USD in Dec 2021.
  • South Korea GDP Per Capita data is updated yearly, available from Dec 1953 to Dec 2022, with an average number of 4,154.900 USD.
  • The data reached an all-time high of 34,983.700 USD in Dec 2021 and a record low of 64.090 in Dec 1955.
Conclusion: New Zealand has been richer for the growth period being discussed.

Corollary: 120 billion is not "pocket change" but accounts for a difference in GDP/capita of $5,454, or a 8521% increase over South Korea's GDP/capita in 1955, or in NZ $48,000 for 2886% increase over New Zealand's GDP/capita in 1961.
 
Last edited:
Well not learned so much as recalled that my reluctance to put people on ignore can be very annoying sometimes when I find their takes inhuman and repugnant. It is still good for me to read them, so I am not "stuck in my bubble". I was hoping for a boomer on old gen xer might have some insight on why they bought into the narrative of evil soviets so hard... I mean I go back and read and listen to the propaganda and it's so childish in its expressions and so clearly manufactured nonsense looking at it now. I think that it is the twenty-year war on terror propaganda veterancy that makes me look at the Red Scare commuphobia propaganda like it's a bad N. Korean movie trying to emulate Hollywood. It is sad because it has had devastating effects on the planet overall and obviously the nation sin which civil wars got turned into US "police actions". It also was very deleterious here in the mindset of the US and how we personally view labor and capital. It is so brain broken here all the way to the top echelons of power. I've heard more than a few voices calling union organizers "evil" and "anti-american". Which is patently absurd.
seems complicated. this is a lot to unpack.
 
  • New Zealand Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per Capita reached 47,046.412 USD in Mar 2023, compared with 48,812.703 USD in Mar 2022.
  • New Zealand GDP Per Capita data is updated yearly, available from Mar 1961 to Mar 2023, with an average number of 13,450.383 USD.
  • The data reached an all-time high of 48,812.703 USD in Mar 2022 and a record low of 1,663.461 in Mar 1961.
  • CEIC converts annual GDP per Capita into USD. Statistics New Zealand provides GDP per Capita in local currency. Federal Reserve Board average market exchange rate is used for currency conversions. GDP per Capita prior to 1992 is sourced from the World Bank. GDP per Capita is in annual frequency, ending in March of each year.
New Zealand Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per Capita reached 47,046.412 USD in Mar 2023, compared with 48,812.703 USD in Mar 2022.
  • South Korea Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per Capita reached 32,236.800 USD in Dec 2022, compared with 34,983.700 USD in Dec 2021.
  • South Korea GDP Per Capita data is updated yearly, available from Dec 1953 to Dec 2022, with an average number of 4,154.900 USD.
  • The data reached an all-time high of 34,983.700 USD in Dec 2021 and a record low of 64.090 in Dec 1955.
Conclusion: New Zealand has been richer for the growth period being discussed.

Corollary: 120 billion is not "pocket change" but accounts for a difference in GDP/capita of $5,454, or a 8521% increase over South Korea's GDP/capita in 1955, or in NZ $48,000 for 2886% increase over New Zealand's GDP/capita in 1961.
I have very little idea what you are trying to measure here.
 
  • New Zealand Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per Capita reached 47,046.412 USD in Mar 2023, compared with 48,812.703 USD in Mar 2022.
  • New Zealand GDP Per Capita data is updated yearly, available from Mar 1961 to Mar 2023, with an average number of 13,450.383 USD.
  • The data reached an all-time high of 48,812.703 USD in Mar 2022 and a record low of 1,663.461 in Mar 1961.
  • CEIC converts annual GDP per Capita into USD. Statistics New Zealand provides GDP per Capita in local currency. Federal Reserve Board average market exchange rate is used for currency conversions. GDP per Capita prior to 1992 is sourced from the World Bank. GDP per Capita is in annual frequency, ending in March of each year.
New Zealand Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per Capita reached 47,046.412 USD in Mar 2023, compared with 48,812.703 USD in Mar 2022.
  • South Korea Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per Capita reached 32,236.800 USD in Dec 2022, compared with 34,983.700 USD in Dec 2021.
  • South Korea GDP Per Capita data is updated yearly, available from Dec 1953 to Dec 2022, with an average number of 4,154.900 USD.
  • The data reached an all-time high of 34,983.700 USD in Dec 2021 and a record low of 64.090 in Dec 1955.
Conclusion: New Zealand has been richer for the growth period being discussed.

Corollary: 120 billion is not "pocket change" but accounts for a difference in GDP/capita of $5,454, or a 8521% increase over South Korea's GDP/capita in 1955, or in NZ $48,000 for 2886% increase over New Zealand's GDP/capita in 1961.

It was over 60 odd years not even 2 billion a year. I was looking at government revenue.
 
I was hoping for a boomer on old gen xer might have some insight on why they bought into the narrative of evil soviets so hard... I mean I go back and read and listen to the propaganda and it's so childish in its expressions and so clearly manufactured nonsense looking at it now.
Leading edge boomers were born 1946-1950 and didn't graduate from HS until 1964+. The propaganda from the 1950s and early 60s was created by those of the previous two generations and directed at themselves. The Civil Rights movement and Beat generation activists were most pre boomer people. Boomer political action really began with the Vietnam protests and the conservative reaction to those protests. The parents, of Boomers, who fought in WW2 and Korea did not talk about their experiences and WW2 was the main war that was taught in schools. By comparison Korea was just a minor affair. Boomers learned much of their WW2 history from John Wayne movies. Keep in mind that in the 50s and 60s Media consisted of local newspapers, weekly and monthly magazines, radio, newsreels at the movies, 3 TV channels, and Hollywood productions. Radio was mostly music and not news. TV news was 30 minutes on weekday evenings. You only saw World news on theater newsreels when you went to the movies (typically on Saturday mornings) and they were about 10 minutes long.

Young Boomers hardly saw any news or read newspapers. News was something for adults to consume until the Vietnam war brought close to home. When I was growing up we got morning and evening newspapers dropped in the driveway. I read the comics and looked at the sports pages. My parents watched a half hour of local news and then another half hour of national news. That was it. Time and Newsweek magazines showed up once a week as did Life magazine.

EDIT: Time was conservative and Newsweek more liberal. Life was pictures.
 
I guess with regards to why this knowledge doesn’t change everything, recognizing that America did really bad things, with great frequency at many key points, much of it swept under the rug, is really important. But the most compelling alternatives have been presented from within, and not from any self declared communist. Sure, some communists are pretty great, but the ones that take power have consistently been horrifying. (I would go so far as to say the fear of state communism would be that everything bad about America could have been amplified. The abuses in the 2nd world were huge and swift. Americanizing it could have been huger and swifter. Who knows.)

I mean the world economic systems designed at Bretton Woods had two main versions, something super awesome and something using many of the same tools that was extremely oppressive. The latter won out, proposed by the American delegate, an alleged Soviet Agent.

Not unfitting, it was accelerationism at its finest. Too bad accelerationism doesn’t actually work.

But Keynes’s proposal, if adopted and followed to the letter and spirit, would have provided far more liberty, equality, justice etc than what strongmen with leftist rhetoric were offering. And there he was, at the table and actually close to power.

The fight is like, to make sure fascists don’t control the FBI and assassinate our best, and to make sure the rich don’t print themselves enough money to be an oligarchy. We traded the winning the former for losing the latter. Let’s get both.
 
are you ok? I don't recall you being this ignorant in your behavior last time I was trolling around.

South Korea supported gansterismo military fascism in the North. None of that was OUR (the US) fudging business. How insanely clear that is looking back now can only be denied by people who were so brain addled by corporate American propaganda to believe that commune-based rice farmers in Korea were going to end American life as they knew it, or the people who were directly involved in turning america into a permanent war economy. Academically it's not a question of what happened anymore, now comes that long slow part where the reality of behavior of the american elite slowly filters down to the population. The Cold War will not make America look good. We were fudging awful in behavior for fudging awful reasons, and the entire population bought it hook, line, and sinker. Like I said earlier, at least they good roads and schools... my generation is going homeless and killing themselves while the same elite (and their fudging kids) continue this nightmare around the world in our names.

None of it was Soviet business either, As the North supported another megalomaniac
How insanely clear looking back now can only be denied by people whom brains are addled by Soviet propaganda

The US has and will do dumb stuff, especially as half the population have lost there minds but overall its been a force for good
Change will come once the older generation die off, its normally how progress is made
 
Well USA last I looked government gets 3.6 trillion a year.

So couple of billion isn't much and im guessing S.Korea its not much either
Well you're completely wrong and I proved it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom