Bug Reports and Technical Issues
- Thread starter Leoreth
- Start date
a pen-dragon
Prince
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2024
- Messages
- 381
Playing on the August 8 version, I got the following error during autoplay, meaning I unfortunately do not have a save. IIRC this occurred around T80? Maybe you can learn something from it anyway:
Another minor thing I noticed is that in the combat log combats with independents are inconsistently displayed.
The logging of a combat starts with listing the units involved with owner, unit type and effective strength being displayed. Then comes a bit of bookkeeping (odds, modifiers, ...) and then the result of each combat round. Lastly the result is displayed noting again the unit types and owner, and who won.
In the initial message of the owner the independents are listed as independents, in each round and the last message as barbarians.
The following is an example:
Code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "BugEventManager", line 382, in _handleDefaultEvent
File "Events", line 22, in handler_func
File "Collapse", line 14, in checkScheduledCollapse
File "Collapse", line 59, in completeCollapse
File "Secession", line 33, in secedeCities
File "CityNames", line 534, in clearChanges
File "Files", line 102, in __getitem__
IndexError: tuple index out of rangeAnother minor thing I noticed is that in the combat log combats with independents are inconsistently displayed.
The logging of a combat starts with listing the units involved with owner, unit type and effective strength being displayed. Then comes a bit of bookkeeping (odds, modifiers, ...) and then the result of each combat round. Lastly the result is displayed noting again the unit types and owner, and who won.
In the initial message of the owner the independents are listed as independents, in each round and the last message as barbarians.
The following is an example:
SultanRedSnake
King
This is something I meant to report previously so I can't say exactly which update putative behavior began, but its safely to place it in the vicinity of the Big Update from the beginning of this month (EDIT: I'm slogging through versions and can at least say its definitely prior to this). Regrets that I'm only now investigating this specifically. I'm also presuming that it's been intended all along for African civs to be able to build Slave Improvements, but this is mainly a sanity check since I'm as certain as possible this is indeed the case.
I suddenly stopped seeing Slave Improvements in the lands of Native African civs. Can confirm Slavery civic is being run in all cases. Tried various Civic combos to rule out as factor and no effects were noted. First tried Swahili, especially since UP might be complicating things. With default capital, Slave improvements were not available ( also WB'd a variety of terrain configurations to rule this out, and no effect observed. I plopped a city on Ponta Delgada and placed Palace to move my capital to Europe. Sure enough, this unlocked Slave improvements. However, Slave improvements seem to be excluded from UP rules. Example: forrested Cotton 1W of Kilwa. With forrest, Build Slave Plantation isnt available as a Slave action, but workers can build Plantation without removing features as intended. To confirm Continent effect, I restored Kilwa as capitol, and as expected Slave improvements were no longer available.
Repeated similar process to check Mali and Congo and same conditions seem to be in effect.
I suddenly stopped seeing Slave Improvements in the lands of Native African civs. Can confirm Slavery civic is being run in all cases. Tried various Civic combos to rule out as factor and no effects were noted. First tried Swahili, especially since UP might be complicating things. With default capital, Slave improvements were not available ( also WB'd a variety of terrain configurations to rule this out, and no effect observed. I plopped a city on Ponta Delgada and placed Palace to move my capital to Europe. Sure enough, this unlocked Slave improvements. However, Slave improvements seem to be excluded from UP rules. Example: forrested Cotton 1W of Kilwa. With forrest, Build Slave Plantation isnt available as a Slave action, but workers can build Plantation without removing features as intended. To confirm Continent effect, I restored Kilwa as capitol, and as expected Slave improvements were no longer available.
Repeated similar process to check Mali and Congo and same conditions seem to be in effect.
Last edited:
No, these improvements are intended for the new world only and have been since their inception.
In what way? Can you upload a save with an applicable situation?
SultanRedSnake
King
Omg so the Sanity Check came up Insane. Yeesh thanks.
Tigranes
Armenian
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2008
- Messages
- 10,422
Yes, of course. The gold value of the rushed hummer is insanely low. As you can see from my screenshot, you can purchase a 1440
Great Wonder with just 86 
!Spoiler Curious historical fact about undervalued gold :
. In 1802, Conrad's father, John Reed, showed the rock to a jeweler, who recognized it as gold and offered to buy it. Reed, still unaware of the real value of his "doorstop," sold it to the jeweler for US$3.50 (equivalent to $76.91 in 2024) (approximately one week's pay for a farm laborer at that time). The large nugget's true value was around $3,600 ($3,600 in 1799 is worth $94,550.63 today).
Last edited:
