C3C Civilizations?

I would like to see in addition to the Hitties, Incas, Mayans, and sumerians:

Austria-Hungary,
Ethiopia,
Israel,
Netherlands,
Poland-Lithuania,
Portugal,
and Sweden.

Of course, most of these i doubt will be in.
 
i support an caribbean civ, along, of course byzanthines, huns and latinamerican......

sorry to be so annoying saying again and again...is just hoping that firaxis hear this......
 
I would like a new Mediterranean civ for C3C, not only that but a whole new expanded variety of AI strategies
 
I think there's enough Mediterannean civs as it is...I'd like to see Israel and feel that failure to acknowledge it contributes to the worldwide ignorance surrounding the Middle East situation. I don't really get it--what has Israel done to be persona non grata? No one could argue they're worse than the Mongols (to even have to compare the two shows how ridiculous the situation has become). Hopefully any decision on whether or not to include Israel stems from its questionable status as a world power (in ancient times) or from the failure of the Civilization game to adequately acknowledge culturally and scientifically influential groups such as the Jews. If an ancient Israel civ had a ruler, it would be Solomon, as he is backed by archaeological evidence (David is not). Plus, it was Solomon who did the best things for Israel when it had complete sovereignty (not a long time at all). As for a modern Israel, it would almost unquestionably be David ben Gurion.

As for great heroes, they could include Bar Kochba and Saul (if ancient Israel) or Ilan Ramon and Ariel Sharon (ooh, too political) for modern. As for UUs, a lot have been thrown around the unit database, and I'm not quite sure. A modern Israel has several military UUs, I'm sure, but I think an advanced Worker would be the best, as Israel was able to transform the entire area so much in the last hundred years.

I'm not sure this would be right for Conquests though--maybe a later expansion, maybe Civ4. I'd like to see the Byzanties and Nubians as well, and there definitely needs to be more African civs.
 
I think they might be going colonial and mesopotamian with this expansion, so what you will probably see are Israel, Portugal, Netherlands, and Eithiopia (you gotta have them!)
 
I would like to see:

Canada, CTP had it so why not C3C?
Scotland, cos i live here and it rocks!
A Central or Southern African civ, Nubia, Ethiopia, only the Zulus live there in the Civ 3 universe at the moment.
Caribbean: Jamaica, Trinidad, Cuba, take your pick
Nepal, i like the country and mountains :)

i know it's 5 an 4 have already been decided out of 8 but i would like to see them.

Hyrule would be nice but it's never going to happen, lol. Shame, might be a cool scenario, quest for the triforce......:D
 
Originally posted by Sarevok
I think they might be going colonial and mesopotamian with this expansion, so what you will probably see are Israel, Portugal, Netherlands, and Eithiopia (you gotta have them!)

yes I would think it is between these ones (because of the scenarios) :

- Portugal (America col)
- Dutch (America col)
- Israel (birth of civ)
- Byzantium (Crusades)
- Ethiopia (Muslim conquest)
- Austria (XVII-XVIIIth century vs Ottomans, Napoleon, WWI) or the Poles.

That is depending on the scenarios of course but these are likely and the American colonization seems pretty sure. I am less sure about other scenarios so I am less sure about the civs they would need too.
Of course that leaves no spot for Asian/African powers for XIXth colonization (except Ethiopia)... but I can only hope I am wrong.

But actually I don't care so much about who will be there. I care about their UU much more.
 
Nepal should be in a civ wich could settle on mountains. So should the aztecs be able to do as well...
 
Originally posted by Sir John
Nepal should be in a civ wich could settle on mountains. So should the aztecs be able to do as well...

The incas more than the Aztecs I believe
 
wasnt it the aztecs that had all those citys on top of the mountains??
 
I believe it was the Incas. Matchu Pichu or however it is spelled.
 
Once again : byzanthines are not basics romans. They developed a different architecture, art, and even religious standards (the catohlic-ortodoxe church).

They may where romans once....but even since constantine victory, they started to become a new civilization.
 
well, if that's your point of view, i'll have to respect it. But i disagree.
 
I would really like to see a Canada. If you want the reasons why a game in the 20th century is pointless without Canada, I will give them to you.
 
There is a show on The Discovery Channel right now about the Byzantines. Just started 15 minutes ago.

I would be 100% in favor of including them as a civ, especially if they had the fire galley as thier UU.
 
i have avoided this for awhile now, but i think that i will chime in...8 new civs...hmmm

Assyria/Hittites..in?
Incans-in
Mayans-are in
Mexico-Calvary pirate UU-poncho Villa-style
Bulgars/or-Eastern European-Knight UU-improved defense
Isreal-(like the wrker UU idea-how about a wrker that has a bit of a defense or attack or that can upgrade to a guerilla like unit if u want later)
Summaria-are in
Australia-Bushman UU-has a machete/machine gun
or Canada- a Fighter plane UU -hurricane-yes i know its british
but alot of Canadian pilots were excellent during ww2
 
Originally posted by Goonie
I would really like to see a Canada. If you want the reasons why a game in the 20th century is pointless without Canada, I will give them to you.

O.K. lets hear it! This should be entertaining..........
Mind you, all references to hockey, curling, Gretsky and canadian bacon are off limits! Stick to the historic facts. And don't get me wrong, I actually think Canada is a wonderful country! I just don't see your point.....but am open to instruction.
 
Back
Top Bottom