C3C Civilizations?

Originally posted by troytheface
i have avoided this for awhile now, but i think that i will chime in...8 new civs...hmmm

Assyria/Hittites..in?
Incans-in
Mayans-are in
Mexico-Calvary pirate UU-poncho Villa-style
Bulgars/or-Eastern European-Knight UU-improved defense
Isreal-(like the wrker UU idea-how about a wrker that has a bit of a defense or attack or that can upgrade to a guerilla like unit if u want later)
Summaria-are in
Australia-Bushman UU-has a machete/machine gun
or Canada- a Fighter plane UU -hurricane-yes i know its british
but alot of Canadian pilots were excellent during ww2

Aren’t the Aztecs Mexico in Civ 3? It is like saying the Italians when Rome is already in. ;)
 
i don't know, i agree rome=italy but when i think of Mexico i think of more a spanish/native mix- not Aztecs who were wiped off the face of the earth- genocidal like-don't think the romans suffered such a complete wipe out. Course the Iroquois sufferred a similiar fate....maybe ur right
 
i don't know why u think Hittites as "militaristic"?
as i know, hittites were very religious. how do i know this?
the only crime that death penalty was given was religious crimes. even you kill a king, you could have a chance to save your life, but noone could steal a dirt from a temple.. then you would say bye bye to your momma.. (stone writings tell that)
industrious may be or commercial..
with the unique unit a chariot ( i know egyptians have it) but needs iron and/or powerful on defence.. (hittites were the "iron man", the best iron workers of that time were that of hittites.)
 
@ nebuchadnezzar
Seeing that your are from there, what UU and wonders do you think that the hittites should have?
I think Muwatallis ll for leader, and maybe some sort of iron works as a city improvement unique to the hittites and a improved swordsmen as the UU.
 
Originally posted by Norlamand


O.K. lets hear it! This should be entertaining..........
Mind you, all references to hockey, curling, Gretsky and canadian bacon are off limits! Stick to the historic facts. And don't get me wrong, I actually think Canada is a wonderful country! I just don't see your point.....but am open to instruction.


Ok, by tonight I will post it.

PS, to Hurricaine guy. Why would Canada use that? Go read up on the Avro Arrow! ;)
 
Avro Arrow? Let's see, they built 5 and scrapped them all.
Maybe ur right, they could be the Canadian UU but u can only build 5 and then u have to disband them. How about the Cf 100
Canuck. At least it was actually produced and Belgium bought some. But i change my mind, maybe a good UU would be a mountain man-or is that American? At any rate, a mountain man that is like an explorer but has an attack and defense.
 
I say Canadian UU should be something that replaces Infrantry. Simply due to our soilders in WW1(Ypres and Vimy Ridge) and in WW2(can't think of anything truly special that compares to Ypres and vimy Ridge)

Kinda curious as to what sorta UU Dutch or Porteguese would have. A galleon or some sorta fighting vessel?
 
For new civs I would like to see old Isreal, Byzantines, Huns, Songhai, and the Khmer.They could have stats such as the following:

Isreal - Rel/Ind - Soloman - Isreali Mercenary(2/2/1) instead of archer.

Byzantines - Com/Rel - Justinian - Cataphracti(4/4/2) instead of knight(could have a special ability of some kind - I'll leave that up to you guys)

Huns - Mil/Exp - Attila - Tarkan(2/1/3)instead of horseman

Songhai - Com/Rel - Sunni Ali - ???

Khmer - Rel/Mil - ??? - ???

I think these civs deserve major recognition and a couple would fill out a world map nicely, like the Songhai and Khmer.
 
1. canadians:)
2. communists
3. ghana(africa)
4. Hopewell(north america)
 
Personally I would love to see an Australian Civ, but I am not holding my breath.
Saying the Byzantines are basically Romans is like saying Americans are basically English.
 
We need more African civs. The Egyptians always dominate Africa in my games.
 
Originally posted by Dman4eva
For new civs I would like to see old Isreal, Byzantines, Huns, Songhai, and the Khmer.They could have stats such as the following:

Isreal - Rel/Ind - Soloman - Isreali Mercenary(2/2/1) instead of archer.

Byzantines - Com/Rel - Justinian - Cataphracti(4/4/2) instead of knight(could have a special ability of some kind - I'll leave that up to you guys)

Huns - Mil/Exp - Attila - Tarkan(2/1/3)instead of horseman

Songhai - Com/Rel - Sunni Ali - ???

Khmer - Rel/Mil - ??? - ???

I think these civs deserve major recognition and a couple would fill out a world map nicely, like the Songhai and Khmer.


Who are the Songhia and Khmer? And, how do you pronounce "Khmer"?
 
A thought on the Cataphract- make them a 4/5/2 with a DEFENSIVE bombard the same as that of a catapult- the flip side, they cost twice as much as a standerd knight, or perphaps only a knight, and half again as much would be better to build.

This woul dre-create they fact that they were the best troops in the world at the time, but eventulally the lengthy training time, and expensivness to maintain led to decreasing numbers, which were eventually drowned out out by overwellminglly massive numbers of arab warriors
 
(just keep hoping, they wont add the byzantines.)

For Sure:
1. Mayans
2. Sumerians
3. Incas
4. Hitties
Probable:
5. Israel
6. Portugal
7. Netherlands
8. Eithiopia
Not likely:
1. Byzantines
2. Canadians
3. Australians
And the countless others...

byzantines were the new romans, they were basically the romans except they lasted 1000 yars longer and were stronger.

Who the hell is going to add the australians and canadians anyway? it would be nice, but it wont happen.
 
Originally posted by Esckey
I say Canadian UU should be something that replaces Infrantry. Simply due to our soilders in WW1(Ypres and Vimy Ridge) and in WW2(can't think of anything truly special that compares to Ypres and vimy Ridge)

Kinda curious as to what sorta UU Dutch or Porteguese would have. A galleon or some sorta fighting vessel?

For Canadian UU I would say - Canadian Mounted Police. If you see one, you imidiatly think Canada :)

For Portuguese I would say a better privateer or caravel.
For the Dutch a faster galleon with offencive power (more expensive)
 
Originally posted by Esckey
I say Canadian UU should be something that replaces Infrantry. Simply due to our soilders in WW1(Ypres and Vimy Ridge) and in WW2(can't think of anything truly special that compares to Ypres and vimy Ridge)

I agree that if Canada, by some amazing miracle, were to actually be included, their UU should be a Infantry unit. Canadian infantry during the First and Second World Wars gained a reputation among the Allies as durable stormtroopers during Vimy Ridge, Ypres, Passchaendale, Normandy, etc. through their campaigns throughout France, Belgium, and the Netherlands.

Also, I would like to add to my list of Civilizations I would like in Conquests( Black=old list, red=new list)

Inca(South America)
Indus(Pakistan)
Ethiopia(Africa)
Assyria(Cradle of Civilization)
Gupta(Northern India)
Denmark/Norway(Europe)
Canada(Ya right, I wish)
Dutch (Because I am part Dutch)
Someone from West Africa or North America (Berbers, Ghana, Cree, Inuit)
 
Maps of the Gupta, Indus, and Assyrians

Gupta Empire 320 A.D.
RefMedia.aspx

Indus Valley Civilization 2500 B.C.
RefMedia.aspx

Assyria 627 B.C.
g.aspx
 
Back
Top Bottom