Can You Go Back To Previous Civ Titles?

I love playing TRON (The Rape of Nations) scenario on civ2...I think I downloaded it from civfanatics back in 2001! I second that the WW2 scenario that came with the game is fun. There is just something enduring about a game you can mod with Microsoft paint and notepad

How do you get Civ 2 to play? What version are you using? I do remember modding civ 2 quite a bit. I'd use unit graphics other people created since I didn't know how to do those, but even dummies like me could create scenarios and mods. I mostly just did scenarios.
 
I regularly play Civ 3 and 4, which I think still is the best the franchise has to offer. I even boot off Civ 1 once in a while just for the nostalgia. Sprinkle in with civ 5 occasionally. For me, Civ6 was always the weakest entry in the franchise, too easy, very cluttered maps, choices feeling arbitrary, uniformative graphics, poor UI, not liking sound design, religion gameplay from hell, the list just goes on) and I actually prefer all other editions.
 
Tried to go back to V, the AI was better at that game, liked the city state stealing Civs like Venice and Austria. After VI it seemed too basic.
 
How do you get Civ 2 to play? What version are you using?
I still have my Civ2 Gold Edition CD. There are different ways to get it to run on a 64bit system; OS emulators and workarounds.

Some threads in the forums on the topic.



 
I have 1600 hours on CiV and I'm sure 80% of that time was played on Play Europe map with an extensive list of mods. I enjoy adding modded medieval civilizations to the map.

Civ5 is probably the last Civ where playing Earth maps is enjoyable. Humankind made me realize that real world maps are useless in games where cities can spread with districts. No one can convince me that having entire Iberian peninsula or Britain as one, huge city in medieval era, with granary the size of real life London and 1/3 or Ireland covered by Pyramid of Giza, looks good. Even with one-tile cities the scale is off, but not as blatantly as with unrestricted dictricts.

I spent an insane amount of time on Earth maps (mostly GEM and Europe) in Civ IV and V, and almost no time in Civ6 and Humankind.
 
Started a CIV 6 game a few days ago to keep the itch scratched for the next few days. Unoffficial map size (bigger than Huge) with 16 CIVs and i am having fun...have´t played the game for a while now. I have a lot of reservations for CIV7 regarding:
1. Small Maps, too few CIVs
2. Bare bones/incomplete Stuff (Religion, Balance, UI, AI)
3. Not a single Greek leader yet! when others have already more than one.
4. CIV switching as well as Eras and the effect they will have on immersion.

but still, the hype has caught up with me and i want to try it out. What can possibly go wrong? we'll see in the coming days after release. :D
 
100% still play MP re CIv 6 and will continue to do so for a fair few years .

May pick up the new “civ” once they have fixed the many obvious red flags and soon to be reviewed fatal game design .
Till civ 8 always Old World
 
I love to make custom scenarios in Civ III.
Civ VI editor is also fun to use, but when the game start... no fun...
Try to make a WWII scenario in Civ VI and the Ai will never build any airplane or carrier. It just can't work.
It's still fun but Civ III editor final results are really on another level of playability and that is what is most important to me.
 
I regularly play Civ 3 and 4, which I think still is the best the franchise has to offer. I even boot off Civ 1 once in a while just for the nostalgia. Sprinkle in with civ 5 occasionally. For me, Civ6 was always the weakest entry in the franchise, too easy, very cluttered maps, choices feeling arbitrary, uniformative graphics, poor UI, not liking sound design, religion gameplay from hell, the list just goes on) and I actually prefer all other editions.
Cluttered indeed. The external improvements, and towering colossi-like units were some of my esthetic gripes. The improvement looks to be definitely back with a vengeance in Civ7. I also agree, religion in Civ6 was way too cartoonish. But the iteration you, conspicuously, didn't list is by, far, my own favourite.
 
I am still playing Civ 4. Compared to later iterations it feels more "sandboxy". Tons of good mods, maps and scenarios available out there. And the best AI in the whole series.

I don't quite understand why some of you say it hasn't aged well.
 
Cluttered indeed. The external improvements, and towering colossi-like units were some of my esthetic gripes. The improvement looks to be definitely back with a vengeance in Civ7. I also agree, religion in Civ6 was way too cartoonish. But the iteration you, conspicuously, didn't list is by, far, my own favourite.
Yeah I have a soft spot for 2 as well! It has the best intro screen music of all the civ-games.Back in the days we played it so much we used to delete the settler and place it at the north pole. HAve fond memories of building a railroad across the Antarctic to invade the AI. It's been a while, but been thinking to try it out with the expansion (I never played that)
 
I love to make custom scenarios in Civ III.
Civ VI editor is also fun to use, but when the game start... no fun...
Try to make a WWII scenario in Civ VI and the Ai will never build any airplane or carrier. It just can't work.
It's still fun but Civ III editor final results are really on another level of playability and that is what is most important to me.
Civ III was, and still is, excellent because of its potential for great scenarios.
 
Civ III was, and still is, excellent because of its potential for great scenarios.
Civ2 has just as great potential. Civ2 subforums are just as dominated by a robust fan-made scenario and scenario graphics industry.
 
Civ2 has just as great potential. Civ2 subforums are just as dominated by a robust fan-made scenario and scenario graphics industry.
I just checked CIV2 subforum out of curiosity and you are right - tons of interesting, great looking scenarios.

Take a look at these Napoleon and Roman Empire scenario screenshots. Looks really good, like a whole new game.
 

Attachments

  • Zrzut ekranu 2025-02-03 180343.png
    Zrzut ekranu 2025-02-03 180343.png
    4.1 MB · Views: 28
  • Zrzut ekranu 2025-02-03 180817.png
    Zrzut ekranu 2025-02-03 180817.png
    526.2 KB · Views: 29
  • Zrzut ekranu 2025-02-03 180650.png
    Zrzut ekranu 2025-02-03 180650.png
    471.1 KB · Views: 26
Anything from Civilization IV onwards is perfectly playable for me.
I play a lot of Civ4, Civ4Col, Civ5 and CivBE (Realism Invictus, We The People, Vox Populi and Codex).

Thanks, modders!
 
I can see myself revisiting VI if I ever feel like experiencing the traditional single civ-style gameplay again.

V, however, has had very little staying power with me since VI released. I go back every now and then for nostalgic purposes, to play with mods or simply to play a game where the World Congress isn't as annoying. But I can never stick with it for longer periods of time nor for longer playthroughs, because the map just looks so boring. Everything I build looks dull. All of my cities look small and unimportant, even if they have 30 pops each. VI took the right steps towards the sprawl I didn't know I was looking for at the time, but wasn't quite there yet. From all of the (frankly gorgeous) screenshots I've seen, VII might just finally have it figured out.
 
I've been playing Civ 3 recently, after picking it up on a Steam sale so that I had a version I could actually load on my current computer. It's still a blast, and I'm just playing vanilla at this point, haven't loaded any mods (yet).

My son saw me playing it and asked what it was. When I told him it was Civ 3, his eyes went bug-eyed and he blurted out, "There were two even older versions??"
 
Back
Top Bottom