Patine
Deity
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2011
- Messages
- 12,025
But what about everything else ???
A case-by-case basis. There were many Greek innovations, but many, many things that were not.
But what about everything else ???
So if I said they invented beards, I could get you dig up evidence there existed Mesopotamian men who did in fact have beards?
That carving is a lie![]()
Hm. Btw what was that ancient Iranian religion, the one with the good vs evil stuff? And what would you call a modern day adherent of that religion?
Earliest photographic evidence of beards."Though shalt not round thy head or mar the corners of thy beard," - Hebrew law that obviously predates the 3rd Millennium BC writing of the script of the Torah, that indicates that Hebrew men had beards, and were obliged to grow them. Also, beards are mentioned in the Mahabharata and other early Vedas.
Damn, didn't know Mesopotamians were so hellbent on lying about beards that they made wax figures of Neanderthals. The Greeks haven't gotten a fair shake, that's for sure. But I do wonder why Gilgy didn't hire Madame Tussaud's to sculpt his pet lion-cub-squirrel
Zoroastrianism? They still exist.Hm. Btw what was that ancient Iranian religion, the one with the good vs evil stuff? And what would you call a modern day adherent of that religion?
Hm. Btw what was that ancient Iranian religion, the one with the good vs evil stuff? And what would you call a modern day adherent of that religion?
Among other things I am anti-Nitsche, and I do not speak ZarathustrianAlthough Nitsche was a jerk Zoroastrians are not. The duality spirit of our nature is the basis of all Abrahamic religions I know to date .
Oh right, Manichaen. What would you call a person today who adheres to that kind of binary, us-vs-them, good-and-evil attitude?Manichaean also fits the bill, though it came later, evolving out of Zoroastrianism - similar to how Christianity evolved out of Judaism and Buddhism evolved out of Hinduism, but became different religions with similar root ideas. Manichaeanism, as an organized religion and practice, has been dead since the 15th or 16th Century, I believe - but, it's black-and-white, binary, us-and-them, no-middle-grounds, over-simplistic-moral-and-doctrinal viewpoint still has a firm (and counter-productive, deleterious, enstupidating, and even destructive) grip on modern social, cultural, political, economic, and even religious (including religions not actually doctrinally compatible with it's viewpoint - which is every extant religion today, except the tiny Zoroastrian minority), greatly denigrating, sabotaging, and distorting the dialogue today, and the world would be better off without such thinking entirely.
Oh right, Manichaen. What would you call a person today who adheres to that kind of binary, us-vs-them, good-and-evil attitude?
Oh right, Manichaen. What would you call a person today who adheres to that kind of binary, us-vs-them, good-and-evil attitude?