This is my first post here but I have to say that I love your mod. But I'd also like to add a little bit of constructive criticism. In the future it would be great if the First Hussars could be included as one of the names for a Canadian Corps. The Hussars were Canada's first cavalry regiment and have 34 Battle Honours ranging from South Africa, the Somme, Vimy, Caen and the Rhineland. Utilized as light infantry and cavalry during the Great War, the Hussars fought with distinction; a tradition that they continued during the Normandy Landings when they became the only allied unit to both acheive and surpass all of their objectives. In fact, their unit made it nearly 30 km inland (the most headway gained by any allied unit that was involved with the beachhead aside from the paratroopers) and were ordered to halt the advance because of logistics. Aside from these honours, the Hussars also experienced their own disaster when an entire squadron of DDTs was annihilated by Hitler's 22nd SS Panzer regiment. That event is remembered somberly as, "The Black Day of the First Hussars." Currently based in Sarnia and London, Ontario, the regiment has undergone the unfortunate transition from armour to reconaisance and the squadron that was lost during the Normandy Landings has (respectfully) never been replaced.
Secondly, the idea of the Canadian Corps as Canada's UU has serious historical issues. During the Great War nearly 70% of the troops who went over with the First Canadian Corps were first or second generation Canadians; this implies that most of our soldiers were recent immigrants and that more established Canadians were much less enclined to fight Europe's war. The scenario that can now be painted is one of recently-arrived European Canadians returning home to fight a war while more established Canadian families preferred to tend to their farms and stay out of Europe's fight. Witness the domestic upheaval over the Draft and the low recruitment of rural English and rural/urban French Canadians as examples to support my argument.
It is for this reason that I feel that the proper use of the Canadian UU is the peacekeeper. Following the establishment of the United Nations and Canadian push for peacekeeping initiatives, we were leaders in this department for nearly two decades. Even today that legacy lives on in the form of Canada's "moral reputation" as a peacekeeping, not peacemaking, society. Given the fact that we have some of the world's best trained soldiers I feel that a moderately balanced Infantry unit with a high defensive value (to discourage attack) would be appropriate. Just my opinion but otherwise keep up the good work.