If one of Blairs close aids is found guilty
there is no doubt Blair would have to resign
and John Prescott would have to take over as PM.
![]()
Seriously though...if we want a more open, democratic society then those are the 3 major things we need to do before we can move towards it.
Do I really need to bring up the fact that labour got a majority of 65 with only 35% of the vote? Or that the Lib Dems got 22% of the vote yet only 9.6% of % of seats? Results like that are proof enough that the first past the post system is not really that representative.Yes they are. They win someplace else.
What a Single Transferable Vote system? Even thats more democratic than what we have now...Yeah, but who do they represent? If I don't like my local MP I can vote him out next time around. Under a PR system, that simply can't happen. Remember Portillo getting the boot? Wouldn't happen under PR. What about independants like Martin Bell? If one guy gets 2% of the vote does he get to represent 4 seats?
The idea we have a 2 party system is faulty at best. Off the top of my head I can think of 7 parties represented in the Commons.
a trial could take a year or so
perhaps...perhaps not...
Maybe, but I think it more likely that Her Majesty would either ask the
UK Chancellor Gordon Brown to form a government or if, by then the
five year term is nearly up, dissolve Parliament and call a general election.
And surely the Queen will have no option but to appoint the Deputy PM for the few weeks it would take to appoint a new leader of the Labour party. (Thats what I have read somewhere). Surely she cannot pick and choose whether it should be Brown or not. Why Brown? Why not Reid? (OK I know Brown is the obvious one but the Queen cant decide that can she - the name Deputy PM must mean something. After all when Blair is off sunning himself at another aged rock stars pad, it has always been Prezza that has stepped in.)
The only way to have a truly representative government is to have a little voting console in every home and we all vote on every single issue. Any system in which we have representatives instead of voting ourselves is not truly representative. First Past The Post more or less guarrantees that one way or another, our government will be able to pass legislation. PR systems can result in weak ineffective government that cannot do a thing. I think the distortions of our system are a good trade off to avoid that.Do I really need to bring up the fact that labour got a majority of 65 with only 35% of the vote? Or that the Lib Dems got 22% of the vote yet only 9.6% of % of seats? Results like that are proof enough that the first past the post system is not really that representative.
What about STV?The only way to have a truly representative government is to have a little voting console in every home and we all vote on every single issue. Any system in which we have representatives instead of voting ourselves is not truly representative. First Past The Post more or less guarrantees that one way or another, our government will be able to pass legislation. PR systems can result in weak ineffective government that cannot do a thing. I think the distortions of our system are a good trade off to avoid that.
Single issue votes are expensive.