CBI Report: "Is there a 'fiftychat mafia'?"

The Ninja

Secretary of Defense
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Messages
148
Location
Space, the final frontier...
After extensive research, the CBI has come to it's conclusion about the possible existence of a 'fiftychat mafia'. While whether or not an actual 'mafia' existed will probably never be settled on, it seems apparent that some form of organized 'vote-rigging' was in existence. The following is a list of persons and evidence against said persons suspected to be involved in these activities:

azale:
"<azale> my activity has been near nil since i got elected, but when im needed ill be ready!
<azale> err, selected"

Gogf:
"<Bill3000> We really need to stop the entire "EVERYONE IN FIFTYCHAT VOTE ON THIS" thing.
<Gogf> why?
<Bill3000> ...because it's alienating people, it's cheating votes, and only causing bickering?"

"<Gogf> if they don't want psedo-participants, they should write the constitution to have some sort of activity requirement
<Bill3000> because the members arn't actually participating, they only vote when we need them"

"<Gogf> well, I don't really see what's wrong with strong political organization"

"Bill3000> Just because it's legal doesn't mean it's right and we should do it tongue
<Bill3000> Most importantly because it's causing sort of a pseudo-scandal right now.
<azale> i kinda agree with bill
<azale> its shady
<Gogf> why?
<Gogf> it's not shady
<azale> do we want downtown to be the nixon of parliament?
<Bill3000> Because I did the same thing in micronations, and it kills nations.
<Gogf> it's much less shady than saying "we know how to abuse the system but we're keeping quiet about it"
<Gogf> if it's a problem, let's fix the . .. .. .. .ing problem
<Gogf> just change the rules
<Bill3000> All it does is alienating people.
<Gogf> presto, problem solved"


gandhi_rules:
"<Lucy> anyone here aware of the fiftychat mafia scandal in mp?
<andrej> much more dangerous
<gandhi_rules> yes
<Hitti-Litti> Me.
<gandhi_rules> i was in it
<andrej> scandal ?
<gandhi_rules> the scandal"

"<gandhi_rules> i voted abstract time cuz perfy asked me to"

"<Lucy> it's mostly just silly paranoia
<gandhi_rules> no
<gandhi_rules> its true
<Lucy> "mafia"?
<gandhi_rules> no
<gandhi_rules> but the scandal
<gandhi_rules> its like watergate"

Red Door:
"<azzaman333> MP is confusing
<gandhi_rules> It was graphics
<gandhi_rules> til the scandal
<Lucy> al costa is a rabid wolverine
<gandhi_rules> no
<gandhi_rules> he's a mafia
<andrej> wolverwine ?
<gandhi_rules> and he's Red Door
<Lucy> he's red door, he's al costa, he's red door, he's al costa
<andrej> costa nostra ?
<gandhi_rules> no
<gandhi_rules> M
<gandhi_rules> A
<gandhi_rules> F
<gandhi_rules> I
<Lucy> a wolverine is a vicious little weasel, andrej
<gandhi_rules> A
<andrej> oh, a bad man
<gandhi_rules> and a mutant whith steel fingers
<azzaman333> al doorsta
<Lucy> nah, i don't think he's a bad guy
<Lucy> just vicious
<andrej> i c
<gandhi_rules> he's you a pope
<andrej> pope?
<gandhi_rules> yeah
<andrej> we got a partriarc"

The CBI urges the government to take such action as is just to its people and prosicute those responsible to the fullest extent of the law via the supreme court. Full transcripts of these conversations will be available to supreme court justices and to the prime minister upon official request at the CBI website.

I will now take questions from the press.

The Ninja, Chief of the CBI and Acting Secretary of Defense
 
Where were these records/logs obtained?

Why am I being accused of being a member of the mafia? I joined this game back in July, and certainly haven't been here for one purpose, as the mafia-accusing has accused the "mafia" or doing.

In Gogf's "evidence," why are some parts cut out?
 
These might have been fabricated observe:

<IAMAFAG> LOL IM NOT A FAG

it takes 10 minutes tops to fabricate evidence
 
I thought this was over and done with already. Especially since the logs are over a month old.

The CBI urges the government to take such action as is just to its people and prosicute those responsible to the fullest extent of the law via the supreme court.
Considering the fact that it's not even against the law because the amendment hasn't passed, there really isn't that much you can do.
 
First off, I'm not saying if there was a mafia or not. Secondly, Red Door, I mearly included you because I included everyone we found evidence incriminating. If the government decides to let the supreme court handle this (Which I hope they do, it's their job,) it will be up to them completely to determine who, if anyone, is 'guilty'. (And I use that word grudgingly.) Although, as for your point about you being here not just to vote, I'm also counting people who may have been involved in 'recruiting' people for vote stuffing. I am not authorized to offer the source yet, as the CBI protects the anonymity of 'tipsters', but I will vouch for the crediblity of the sources.

The reason Gogfs evidence appears to be cut up is because those are actually seperate occasions, not one long blob of text. Like I said, full 'un-cut' versions will be made availiable to the SC and the PM (and possibly the media, if there ever is one again,) upon request.

@Bill3000: If there is no law and no reason to take action, then doubtless the SC will decide that is the case. I am not here to prove anyone guilty or otherwise, mearly to bring possible issues to the attention of the SC, and let them handle the rest.

The Ninja
 
First off, I'm not saying if there was a mafia or not. Secondly, Red Door, I mearly included you because I included everyone we found evidence incriminating. If the government decides to let the supreme court handle this (Which I hope they do, it's their job,) it will be up to them completely to determine who, if anyone, is 'guilty'. (And I use that word grudgingly.) Although, as for your point about you being here not just to vote, I'm also counting people who may have been involved in 'recruiting' people for vote stuffing. I am not authorized to offer the source yet, as the CBI protects the anonymity of 'tipsters', but I will vouch for the crediblity of the sources.

I'd like to see the evidence of me "recruiting" people, because as far as I can tell, I never said a line on any of your selected quotes. I'd just like to know where you got these logs from, because until you can provide a source, I'm going to have to doubt the validity of these sources.

The first one is remembered by those present, including myself, but the other ones are of questionable authenticity, because knowing the time of it and who gave it to you would jog our memory possibly.

The reason Gogfs evidence appears to be cut up is because those are actually seperate occasions, not one long blob of text. Like I said, full 'un-cut' versions will be made availiable to the SC and the PM (and possibly the media, if there ever is one again,) upon request.

I think it would be of best interest for all of Parliament to see the whole transcript.
 
There is obviously no law, and at the moment, no supreme court. We'd have numerous hearing on the matter, attempting constitutional amendements, and we've moved on. Please dont dig this up again
 
Yeah, those who asked everyone to vote on something were not forced to do it. So #fiftychat mafia = another way of campaigning. People were basically asking for their votes, like all politicians do.
 
Back
Top Bottom