Circumcision

Your opinion on circumcision?

  • I'm ok with both male & female circumcision

    Votes: 2 1.3%
  • I'm ok with male circumcision, but not female

    Votes: 96 63.2%
  • I'm ok with female circumcision, but not male

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • I oppose both male & female circumcision

    Votes: 47 30.9%
  • Other/Don't care/Radioactive monkeys

    Votes: 6 3.9%

  • Total voters
    152
Halcyon said:
Not to mention ugly.

To be honest - I'm one of the most devout anti-circumcision people you can find. However I don't think calling the circumcised penis "ugly" helps anybody because it turns it into an us and them debate in which people start getting defensive about "how they are". As soon as you do that the pro-circumcision people will automatically discount your opinions because to agree with you is to admit that there is something "wrong" with them and I don't believe that to be the case.
 
I'm ok with male circumcision, but not female
That gets my vote. Male circumcision prevents two, ahem, forms of cancer.
The word for the other option is not "circumcision", but FGM. Female Genital Mutilation.
I wish I could see who voted for option three and give them a piece of my mind...
 
RedWolf said:
To be honest - I'm one of the most devout anti-circumcision people you can find. However I don't think calling the circumcised penis "ugly" helps anybody because it turns it into an us and them debate in which people start getting defensive about "how they are". As soon as you do that the pro-circumcision people will automatically discount your opinions because to agree with you is to admit that there is something "wrong" with them and I don't believe that to be the case.

Fair play, I meant nothing malicious. Anyway, 's pretty unattractive no matter what you cut off it.
 
Halcyon said:
Fair play, I meant nothing malicious. Anyway, 's pretty unattractive no matter what you cut off it.

That's funny. I was thinking the same thing myself. :)
Most women will agree with you - remember the sienfeld episode where Elaine compares men's bodies to a jeep? :)
 
I'm truly against circumcising infants no matter what the gender, as circumcision is mutilation. If those same infants desire to cut part of themselves off later in life when they can make an informed decision, then they should be free to do so.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't there different types of female circumcision (other than the removal of the clitoris)?

Apparently circumcision is solely a Jewish custom, but in Ethiopia (Eastern Orthodox Christian), both male and female circumcision are widely practiced among the Christians.
 
There are some Christians who practise circumcision, but it's a bit theologically dubious. The Ethiopian Church has strong historical links to Judaism, which may explain it. They're not Eastern Orthodox though - in fact, technically, they're heretics from the standpoint of the Orthodox and Catholics alike.

As for ugly - well, I don't think there's anything very attractive about a body part that looks like it's been jammed into a pencil sharpener, but perhaps I'm a bit unreconstructed!
 
Yom said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't there different types of female circumcision (other than the removal of the clitoris)?
There's a few variants. I'm not gonna list them here, tho; a google search might be informative.

Does your status happen to mean "king of kings"?
 
"As for ugly - well, I don't think there's anything very attractive about a body part that looks like it's been jammed into a pencil sharpener, but perhaps I'm a bit unreconstructed!"

maybe for you
 
The Last Conformist said:
There's a few variants. I'm not gonna list them here, tho; a google search might be informative.
Before that, I must warn you not to eat anything. Some of the things they still do to women are simply gross :eek:
 
Loaf Warden said:
Male circumcision is harmless. I can see arguing against it for consent-based reasons, but any argument about harmful effects holds no water. There are none.

Female circumcision is another matter altogether. As a practice, it is more analogous to foot-binding than it is to male circumcision. It has no place in a civilized country, and anyone who would be "okay" with the practice needs to look it up and find out what it actually is.
I'm with Loafy entirely on this one. The two are apples and oranges.
 
Red Wolf wrote
I firmly believe you're wrong about this... I'm not going to debate your other philosophical ideals because thats you're right to believe in whatever you want...
In what sense am I wrong about this? What is the specific detriment to a child that you feel is conferred by circumcision? I gave my specific reasons, which of them is ‘wrong’?
However the idea that no pain was felt is clearly wrong and I don't believe that a person without a medical background is qualified to state that "no pain was felt".
I did not say that no pain was felt, I said it was not torture and that the pain was not excessive. I feel qualified to say this as I held both of my sons while they were circumcised, both within the last few years. I don’t see what would make anyone more qualified, excepting perhaps a moile. My father is a medical doctor, and held his two sons while they were circumcised. He concurs if that makes you feel any better.
Clearly it's excruciating pain and most medical studies will show this.
Clearly ??? Have you personal experience with this ??? link to said studies ??? How is this measured in an infant anyway? You are showing your unfounded bias here. I am quite sure that birth was much more painful for my children than circumcision, care to refute that? I also assisted in the births of both my children. What is your experience in this area?

In any case it is not clear to me how even if it were excruciating pain that would make any difference. You commit your child to a life in which he/she is guaranteed to feel the full gamut of pain and pleasure when you decide to have one. That is part of being human. One just hopes the child lives long enough.

As I said in my earlier post, for me it is not about belief but about ritual and being human.
Take a razor blade to your ear and start cutting - see how much pain you feel.
Please, that comment seems quite infantile to me. I have had much worse experiences than a bit of a razor blade cut to the earlobe. The most painful experiences by far are emotional (for the vast majority of humans). I worry much more about my children’s experiences with social acceptance and unrequited love than I do about say… a broken arm.

Pain is part of the human experience, and is often part of ritual experiences for a good reason. It helps bring together the duality that makes up all of us, mind and body. The existence of transitory pain is not a reason to do, or not do, something worth doing.

You may not want to circumcise your children, that's fine with me, but I have seen you offer no substantial reason why a child should not be circumcised. I have yet to see one in this thread, nothing substantial enough to even need 'discounting'.
Most women will agree with you - remember the sienfeld episode where Elaine compares men's bodies to a jeep?
Heh, not that it matters but Elaine expresses a preference to the circumcised unit in that episode.
 
While we're on the topic of "ugliness", I have an observation. Most people here seem to be of the opinion that the circumcised member is ugly, whereas the opposite seems to be true where I'm from. A matter of local aesthetics perhaps?
 
Back
Top Bottom