City Placement 3

Originally posted by Stuck_As_a_Mac
I like that. If the poll I posted dosent hit quorm, Ill call a stop vote at the TC for that one.

What's a stop vote? Is that a Freudian Slip? :king:
 
I love this proposal.

I believe the placement of Octavinium is different though than that which is currently being polled...
 
Octavian speaks the truth. I will never allow city placement to be decided by spot vote as long as I have the power to prevent it.
 
i would like to put up my proposal here:
position A is already set by a poll, it will be "KuhKaff".
So positions B- will be the proposal.

No resource loss, enough space for bavaria to grow and good spacing. Thats what i tried to achieve.
 
Octavian: read my post :-) A ist the position which was already decided by the poll.
We talk about positions B- from now on ;-)
I believe the old B-position was good for the old A-position, but as we decided for the new A-position the onld one doesnt fit any more.

Meaning the above proposal covers the placements for the next 5 cities.
 
Well, we wont use those extra space tiles until we get pop>12. do we really need them? we could later with hospitals decide for every 2nd city to be with a hospital and then use the leftover tiles of the non-hospital cities to let them grow.

im a strict believer in the 2-tile-spacing (didnt we poll on city spacing?)
 
Back
Top Bottom