Civ 4 Civilizations

I think that some people are missing the point in why some civ's are not in. Most of civilizaion's sales come from North American and European countries, as well as probably a few Asian ones (Japan, S. Korea).

So naturally they are going to include North American civs (USA), Euorpean (England, France, Spain,etc..) and Asian (Japan, China) and they will skimp out on some civs that should be in the game but are not because hardly any civ games will sell there such as Africa, the Middle East and the Latin/South America area, not because they do not think they are not important.
 
Kshatriya said:
Are you serious? No doubt Europe has made much technological progress since the Industrial Revolution, but no way that's true. With the exception of Europe's technological progress since the 1700's, for most of history, India and China were way above Europe.

Just because India/China are unified countries, doesn't mean that they aren't culturally diverse. In fact, there are probably cultures in India that are as dissimilar to each other as two different European countries.

EDIT: sorry, I didn't see post #134 before I wrote this... my apologies :D

After re-reading my post, I think I have also underestimate the importance of Asia. My apologies.
 
silverwind said:
I think that some people are missing the point in why some civ's are not in. Most of civilizaion's sales come from North American and European countries, as well as probably a few Asian ones (Japan, S. Korea).

So naturally they are going to include North American civs (USA), Euorpean (England, France, Spain,etc..) and Asian (Japan, China) and they will skimp out on some civs that should be in the game but are not because hardly any civ games will sell there such as Africa, the Middle East and the Latin/South America area, not because they do not think they are not important.

true in some cases (eg usa) but not in all, i mean civ doesnt sell much in mongolia ;)
i think that lower africa civs (below the med coastal ones) are in so that there can be some civ in a world map in that part of africa. The truth is that there simply isnt any civ there that played an undeniably huge role in world history (by which i mean that it would have directly influenced world culture in very easily identifiable ways). Mali, from what i have read, after seing it in the lists, was an important civ, but it never played such a massive role, i mean if Mali is in the first 18 why not include civs like bulgaria? Bulgaria played at least an equally significant role regionally, was quite big at some times, finally faded away etc etc, then ressurected itself. If bulgaria had been somewhere in cnetral africa it probably would have been in the first 18 civ3 civs ;)
 
Is "America" a hybrid of the United States and Native American Tribes? I think this would be preferable. Cities include: Washington, Mississippi, Boston, Cherokee, Philadelphia, and Miami. This is preferable because of the recent push by the US government for the rights and recognition of Native Americans. Gosh, there is a Smithsonian building being erected in D.C. that is dedicated entirely to these people.
 
urederra said:
Europe, with its 400 (?) million people has achieve more in science, arts, philosophy, politics, culture, economics and military in the last millenium than China and India together, with their 2200 million inhabitants.

And that is thanks to the culture variety that Europe has, in that tiny piece of land.

I agree, and I think some others have missed your point.

Claiming any achievement to be exclusive is not a difficult principle to substantiate. Granted, it is hard to claim that some achievements are exclusive. Take, for example, monotheism. You can't say definitively that the Jews came up with that, or the Zoroastrians, or whoever. But something like Calculus? I think it's pretty clear that Newton and Leibniz exclusively invented that. And while it is obviously true that some Eastern achievements (like the concept of zero, for one) facilitated their invention, that does not contradict the fact that Calculus is a scientific achievement developed by European scientists in the last thousand years.

I agree that Eastern culture has achieved many great things over the course of human history. And it is almost impossible to quantify the historical significance of their innovations...how can you say that something like paper is more or less important than something like television? But I think it is pretty self-evident that if you confine the innovations to the last thousand years, Europe has far out-stripped any Eastern culture. Here's an abbreviated list of achievements of uniquely European/American origin over the last thousand years (derived in part from the CivIII tech tree):

steam power, modern medicine (sanitation, anti-biotics, transplantation, psychotherapy, genetics, cloning, etc.), the scientific method, modern astronomy, modern physics, modern atomic theory, interchangeable parts, industrialization, combustion, flight, television, radio, photography, analog storage media, mass production, motorized transport, electromagnetic theory, electronics, calculus, relativity, rocketry, space flight, fission, computers, nuclear power, satellites, the laser, miniaturization, and communism

I could go on and on. There are some European achievements which just aren't fair to quantify (like art and music for instance, even though it is apparent that the Eastern culture highly regards Western music, since all of Asia's most talented musicians focus their efforts on classical music, a Western innovation). But there are some achievements which have undeniable significance in modern society. I mean, seriously, how can you look at that list above and say that those innovations don't have staggering significance? And how can you say that they aren't exclusively Western? Of course none the things on that list would've been developed without the influence of some elements of Eastern culture...but using that reasoning to deny their exclusivity forces you to admit that ANY idea that ANY person EVER thinks up is NEVER exclusive, since it is the byproduct of the cultural influences of EVERY civilization that has EVER existed. And some of you might genuinely believe that's true. But I think there is something by which an achievement or innovation is made unique or exclusive, and even if I can't exactly articulate what that something is, I'm pretty sure that it applies to at least a few of the things listed above, and therefore confirms urederra's point.

EDIT: oops, I was wrong...cloning was an Eastern innovation (Tong Dizhou in 1963: http://www.pbs.org/bloodlines/timeline/text_timeline.html); even though a European scientist was the first to theorize genetic cloning, that Tony guy was the first to actually do it
 
Crayton said:
Is "America" a hybrid of the United States and Native American Tribes? I think this would be preferable.

This is preferable because of the recent push by the US government for the rights and recognition of Native Americans. Gosh, there is a Smithsonian building being erected in D.C. that is dedicated entirely to these people.
After more than 100 years there are going to be some building in the Smithsonian institute about "these people"?
So starting to mourn them and recognise their culture means that their culture will become mixed together with the same one which was about to destroy their original culture and whole population in the first place?
Sounds interesting but isn't really "preferable" to me.
 
conqueso said:
But I think it is pretty self-evident that if you confine the innovations to the last thousand years, Europe has far out-stripped ...
steam power, modern medicine (sanitation, anti-biotics, transplantation, psychotherapy, genetics, cloning, etc.), the scientific method, modern astronomy, modern physics, modern atomic theory, interchangeable parts, industrialization, combustion, flight, television, radio, photography, analog storage media, mass production, motorized transport, electromagnetic theory, electronics, calculus, relativity, rocketry, space flight, fission, computers, nuclear power, satellites, the laser, miniaturization, and communism
I could go on and on.
Calculus was not invented, it was discovered. Same for relativity, electromagnetism, and antibiotics (which were known in prehistoric times, btw).

Steam power is older than 1,000 years, as are sanitation, transplantation, interchangeable parts, rocketry, miniaturization, mass production, communism, industrialization, scientific method, flight and analog storage media.

Fission, genetics, space flight, cloning and several more can hardly be claimed by Europe.

Now drop the 'modern thisandthats' and what is truely left?
 
Early American achievements in self-government were modeled after The Iroquois League. Now that I reflect, these are two distinct cultures that did anything but mesh neatly, especially following the American Civil War. I also apologize for seeming insensitive when I singled out Native Americans with the demonstrative pronoun: "these". I was only searching for unity between these separate cultures which have shared the same land and history (at least for the past four hundred years).
 
Supposedly the Library of Alexandria held designs for a steam engine.
Antibiotics in prehistoric times! I believe you; but, are you refering to medicines?
 
The loss of the Library of Alexandria is my opinion was probably the single biggest loss in historical terms ever. Not refering to an entire nation just a single building or item.
 
Hannabir said:
Calculus was not invented, it was discovered. Same for relativity, electromagnetism, and antibiotics (which were known in prehistoric times, btw).

Steam power is older than 1,000 years, as are sanitation, transplantation, interchangeable parts, rocketry, miniaturization, mass production, communism, industrialization, scientific method, flight and analog storage media.

Fission, genetics, space flight, cloning and several more can hardly be claimed by Europe.

Now drop the 'modern thisandthats' and what is truely left?
Calculus is a mathmatical technique derived from observable facts and as such is an invention (as flight is an invention even if design aspects are taken from birds) and working out those flippant observations of Relativity and general field equations for electromagnitism is still rather impressive.

It is impossible debate each individual point but it must be admitted that European civilisation is almost solely responsible for meaningful adaptations of most of that list, eg. there is a world of difference between pre-history antibiotic tinctures and the use of modern antibiotics and the understanding of how they work

And those which cannot be claimed by Europe is again hard to prove conclusively, but remember the US is a derivative of European culture + ideals

Aside from modern 'thisandthats' Europe has contributed more to world understanding of geology and biology than anyone else (for the first true world maps you must look to Europe, and the classification of the planet's biodiversity was largely a European compilation.

However despite this I do agree that India made its own siqnificant contributions to world history and it (and similar civs) should not be ignored or classified as primitive. In terms of modern science they have made contributions eg Chandrashka demonstrated the maths behind the balance that holds the stars in one piece.

Europe is important, Asia is important. Deal with it
 
I am so annoyed why do they not include the Scottish Civilisation!!!!, Scotland has a great history and has been very well known through out it. We have fought the vikings, romans, English in the medieval times and in the modern times weve fought in both world wars. As far as technology advances the Scottish have invented the telephone, television, penisilin and have some of the best Universities In EUrope!! There is very little that goes on that the Scots are not involved in. HOnestly how hard can it be for the designers just to include them. This is the only thing which really really annoys me about the civ games. They even include Civilisations like Persia!!!!, wat have they ever done!!!
 
ScottishAdam05 said:
I am so annoyed why do they not include the Scottish Civilisation!!!!,

They even include Civilisations like Persia!!!!, wat have they ever done!!!

FREEDOM!!!
:lol:
 
Persia was the first huge empire of the ancient era, at least in the known part of the world for the west (Greece). Also its position on a world map would be a lot more reasonable than Scotland, due to the english nearby, on the same island. I am not familiar with the scottish contribution to world culture/science, i am sure that it is a nice country, but wouldnt the world, in your view, be pretty much the same if scotland never existed? (by which i dont mean that it would be identical, just that it wouldnt be so different so that scotland would just need to be in a list of 18 civs, although perhaps it can be in a list of 30 civs).
If civ started in the 17th century perhaps it would make a lot more sense to include Scotland, but since it starts at 4000 bc (i know that all of the west would have to stay out then anyway) Scotland seems to be less singificant in that timeframe.

on another note: you may have come across this already: steam was first used in Hellenistic Alexandria, but sadly its function there was to make doors open seemingly by themselves, so that a pseudo-magician (sage) could impress his followers. Ofcourse it was later on used commercially by the english, starting the industrial revolution.
 
ScottishAdam05 said:
They even include Civilisations like Persia!!!!, wat have they ever done!!!

Oh, I don't know, how about dominating the Middle East for centuries? Persia
 
Do you know the empire Persia had? The influence considering religion, etc. it has? Do you know why Alexander the Great is called the Great and so famous today that they shot one hollywood movie after another of his life? Because he conquered Persia! ...

Scotland is a great nation, etc. And I definitely would include it, at about place 40-50. There are just more deserving civilizations in the World, sorry. And Scotland has two other big disadvantages:

A. It lies in Europe and thus has to compete with civs like England or Britain(!!), France, the Dutch, the Portuguese, Poland(-Lithuania) and Austria-Hungary which all contributed more to 'world's' history than Scotland as a nation! Scotland was sucked up by England and the three countries or nations then formed the new and great civilization of Britain. You probably know that this is another problem: Do you include Britain or England, Scotland and Wales?

B. What 'bout the Celts? Scotland is a celtic nation, like Ireland, Wales, 'Gaul' and the 'other ancient celtic tribes'. The Celts deserve to be included. But how? Do you make them the 'ancient Celts' or do you make them the medieval celts or something in between. Because civ4 hasn't place for 'Ancient Celtia', 'Wales', 'Scotland', 'Ireland' and so on.

so you probably see the problems, but you can be relieved. I'm sure, it won't take long, and someone made a beautiful Calgacus- or Every-Medieval-Scottish-Leader-Whose-Name-I-Just-Forgot leaderhead... :D

mitsho
 
Nono, England, Wales and Scotland together form Britain and together with North Ireland the UK (United Kingdom). They are own nations and together form a Union, a 'country'. That's also why the play as their own in sports, for example football/soccer. Isn't Spain with one of those in a group (WM 2006 Germany-Qualification)?

You can also see that in the flag of the UK which is comprised of the English St.-George-cross, the Scottish St.-Andrew's-cross (not sure on this, correct?) and the Irish St.-Patrick's-cross. Why isn't the Welsh flag included? Weird...

That's what I know. May a native Brit correct me... :)

mfG mitsho
 
Hannabir said:
Calculus was not invented, it was discovered. Same for relativity


Not true. Calculus, relativity, and other scientific theories are simply models of reality, a framework which has been highly succesful in predicting outcomes in the real world. But, they are theories, and as such inventions. All of math or any other theoretical science for instance is a human invention. They are all abstractions, with no more substance than any other language. A scientific theory is nothing more than a man-made tool for predicting outcomes with certainty. The only things science "discovers" (despite popular jargon) are the phenomena it actually observes. To predict a phenomena requires a theoretical model, which is a man-made construct (no matter how reliable it is).
 
I am pretty happy with the civilization list; though I question the importance of a few I think these 18 civs make a good platform on which to build civ IV on.
 
Back
Top Bottom