I'd argue that the fact that you don't want to is a part of the problem too. This is your choice. The developers have given you a way to play with the civilisation of your choice, and you're saying "I don't want to, because of a different thing". This is not me saying that your preference isn't valid - of course it is. I'm saying it's a different argument. Do you therefore concede that you can play with any Civilisation that you want to? Whether or not you're going to, whether or not you want to. Can you, yes or no?Why can't I? because they're locked behind ages system and I don't want to play single age games when this is a series known for its campaign of the entirtity of human history
Again it's a gameplay change. Going "well you could just play one age". No i don't want to, this is part of the problem
shrugsThat point is completely seperate from what is actually being complained about and quite disingenious
I was trying to make sense of a FIFA analogy. I wasn't being disingenuous at all.
In your opinion.Civ swapping as a designed mechanic in this game is objectively changing the way the game will be played . The end
Okay, so assuming for the moment that this is accurate, what are you attempting to show with this? That people on streams react emotively when faced with a change (back when they knew very little about the game itself)? What is this evidence of? Does this evidence still hold up?The actual point many of you seem to be missing is that the stream was OVERWHELMING negative towards the change. It actual doesn't matter how many Ls were posted, that's just pedantic