Really, IMHO, the poll should have been done here, not on Twitter. There would have been fewer people and more prominent biases, sure, but there's pretty much no chance of random people who know nothing about Civ 6 voting for the "best Leader" getting into the votes.
Alright, fanatics! Let's get ready for a lot of Rome references over the next month.
Though, if one were to make a Twitter account for Trajan, what would he even post about? Conquering? Building projects? Quelling Jewish rebellions? (well, maybe not that one...)
Alright, fanatics! Let's get ready for a lot of Rome references over the next month.
Though, if one were to make a Twitter account for Trajan, what would he even post about? Conquering? Building projects? Quelling Jewish rebellions? (well, maybe not that one...)
Though, if one were to make a Twitter account for Trajan, what would he even post about? Conquering? Building projects? Quelling Jewish rebellions? (well, maybe not that one...)
Hmmmm, you may be missing the point of being on social media, for a company. But who stops us from doing the same? Including more leaders of course... Go girls!
Many points below zero.
But being on social media can serve a purpose, for a human as for a company.
It can also be just because the competition is there too, which then means there is no purpose.
"Ditissimas tui Twitter regiones diripiendas hostibus dedisti. Num propagatio adeo te terret?"
(You have given over the richest areas of your Twitter to your enemies to be despoiled. Surely expansion doesn't scare you that much?)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
But who stops us from doing the same? Including more leaders of course... Go girls!
