Epimethius
Wish I Hadn't Been Here
- Joined
- May 29, 2004
- Messages
- 770
In light of what may be Iroquois agression, not to mention calls for the conquest of Rome, the City Naming Office has seen fit to start this official discussion on the matter of whether we should change city names after capturing them to get more citizen names covered. After a two day discussion will come a two day poll (I'm in no rush) on the matter. This is part of the City Naming Office's attempt to be more democratic and friendly.
The question is whether or not we want to rename a city that we capture or flip from another tribe. One way to do this would simply be to assign the next name down the list to the city, which would increase the number of names we'd get through (which is good, because there are a lot of names). Another would be to only change it slightly to make it sound more Japanese (Nyapolas), or for a special occasion (renaming Rome "Victory" for example). The problem with both is that you have to get used to new names, and that makes things very confusing. This was done last time, and I have to say I was extremely confused.
The question is whether or not we want to rename a city that we capture or flip from another tribe. One way to do this would simply be to assign the next name down the list to the city, which would increase the number of names we'd get through (which is good, because there are a lot of names). Another would be to only change it slightly to make it sound more Japanese (Nyapolas), or for a special occasion (renaming Rome "Victory" for example). The problem with both is that you have to get used to new names, and that makes things very confusing. This was done last time, and I have to say I was extremely confused.