Communism III

Originally posted by Greadius
:lol:
Bataan Death March & the Trail of Tears can add another walk to their ranks?

Hah! Davo!
Greadius has you there, my lad!

The idea of communism too easly becomes a lash in the hand of beastly dictators...

I my view...no major nation is about to become the new USSR.
The whole idea is surreal.

Sorry, Davo.

:o
 
I think that what ComradeDavo means is that he doesn't have an exact blueprint of what communism will look like; there isn't a plan that must be carried out.

I can't speak for him though.....
 
People have to be involved in decisions and vote about what to do(by refendenda and initiatives);politically and economically-that way the system won't be misled and will not collapse.options n theories are the choices of the people.
 
Congratulations, knowltok2, on your success in living by your true calling, Master Baker. You know you're very lucky among us to be working at something you do well because it's what you love. Now I want to make every American the hero of your story, and I won't accept a situation where only a few can live it at one time. Do you have any ideas on how to accomplish that?

Bin men. Reminds me of something I once heard about the USSR: "Bricklayers are better paid than brainsurgeons", the pay calculation being modified by life-expectancy-by-occupation, tuition repayment, and probably an hundred other factors. Does anyone know about this? I'm intrigued.

I must say that it's horrible to pay someone a certain amount to do work one finds unsavoury if one wouldn't do it for that amount. Specialization and the fact we only have so much time makes doing everything ourselves impossible. I'm known as a "nice guy with tools", and get asked to do all sorts of things which others can't do (or, from conditioning: believe they can't do). Some of it, like having to snake out a sewer-line or lift a toilet, is I think what we agree to be unsavoury work. It's also very rewarding when you drop the belief that certain kinds of necessary work are inferior.

All work is good to do, if one can do it well and do it for people who need it. Why would I waste myself being idle? People aren't built to be idle. In fact, idleness is physically unhealthy. It only occurs when people are injured, actually exhasted, or have some psycholgical/social problem that makes them idle.

Is capitalism related to the social problem that makes so many people long for idleness (leisure)?

I think that altruism functions very nicely on a large scale now. The taxes I pay are for Canadians in general, including, and most especially for, the crack addict in the lane. BC is a "have" province, so we redistribute money to the "have not" provinces. The Canadian people fought to bring in a welfare system, and we pay into it. Why?

It works for everybody. The more taxes we pay, the better it works. The capitalists argue for lower taxation. I argue for more.
 
Sean, people have been trying to force other people to work so that they may be idle for thousands of years before capitalism. The leadership in most any communist country does nothing productive either (unless starving your own people is productive.) Blaming people being lazy on capitalism isn't just wrong, it flies in the face of recorded history.

Don't think that I condone being idle. I think it's great that you have that attitude about work. I just think its naive to think that everyone else does too.
 
Originally posted by Fez_Monk
The problem I have with interest is when it approaches the point of usury. Interest that is not exorbitant is not something I would do away with (yet ;) ).

In fact, I think individual entreprenuership is good; I would like to see more of it.

And their are laws in place regarding usury. About the only places that don't have to follow them are those check cashing places. Never been to one myself, but read an article about how the interest rate charged can be upwards of 1000%. I'm all for bringing those places in line, but I doubt that that is what you were thinking of.

What percentage rate do you consider wrong?
 
Originally posted by Damien


Ok,those counties were supposed to be a sample of the country's pop.So let's reduce it to a sample(6,000 people) of the targeted pop.Young people for new clothes,people workin in the aeronautic industry for airplanes.What are marketing polls?Let's make it mandatory.

Marketing polls are fine. The key distinction is that I am not supporting a project or crazy idea if I don't want to. If you make it mandatory the first thing I'm going to do is start coming up with my new variation on hundreds of products. Are you going to test them all? Is society going to bear the burden of the risk of failure of my products so that I can keep on coming up with losers as long as I like?

I have no programming knowledge, but you should try my operating system! ;) Lets get 6,000 people to install it on their computers and test it for a month. Absurd, I know, but then who is going to make the judgement that it is absurd? A panal of old men and women who can remember using a slide rule?
 
Originally posted by Sean Lindstrom
Congratulations, knowltok2, on your success in living by your true calling, Master Baker. You know you're very lucky among us to be working at something you do well because it's what you love. Now I want to make every American the hero of your story, and I won't accept a situation where only a few can live it at one time. Do you have any ideas on how to accomplish that?

Every American, or citizen of the world can't be the hero. Not under capitalism, and certainly not under any communal system larger than say 100 people. The reason is that not everyone will have the idea to put icing on a cinnamon roll. Nor will everyone work extra hard to make their vision a reality. Nor will everyone take the risk required to open their own muffin shop. They could, if they wanted to. Of those that do meet all of the above requirements, only some will suceed. Some rolls and muffins will taste better than others. Some people will not pick the best locations to put their carts and stores. Some will do alright by themselves, but when they try to expand they will not handle people well and will loose money through theft, laziness, poor customer service, etc.

Somewhere you get the notion that life should be ultimately fair, and no matter the inherent differences among people that will make one a better baker, another a better surgeon, and another not too damn good at anything; you want them all to recieve the same things in life. Life just doesn't work that way. We have a system that allows everyone the opportunity to improve themselves and pursue their happiness as best they can given their luck in the lottery of life. It is all about what you inherit, be it money, good parents, strong arms, a quick mind, an inability to comprehend fractions, etc., and how you use it. Just as luck plays a factor in what you get to start with, it also plays a factor in what happens along the way. A chance meeting, a missed bus, picking the right horse.

You just can't magically level the playing field and enforce equality of circumstances. To do so would be to rip the soul out of hundreds of millions of people who strugle each and every day to improve their lives and the lives of their children because they know that their efforts can make a difference.


I must say that it's horrible to pay someone a certain amount to do work one finds unsavoury if one wouldn't do it for that amount. Specialization and the fact we only have so much time makes doing everything ourselves impossible. I'm known as a "nice guy with tools", and get asked to do all sorts of things which others can't do (or, from conditioning: believe they can't do). Some of it, like having to snake out a sewer-line or lift a toilet, is I think what we agree to be unsavoury work. It's also very rewarding when you drop the belief that certain kinds of necessary work are inferior.

All work is good to do, if one can do it well and do it for people who need it. Why would I waste myself being idle? People aren't built to be idle. In fact, idleness is physically unhealthy. It only occurs when people are injured, actually exhasted, or have some psycholgical/social problem that makes them idle.

This is your opinion, and you are entitled to it. However not everyone shares your belief. You have a worldview of what is good for people, what they should find rewarding, and how they should be spending their time on earth. "Well, forgive me father for I have sinned. I have coveted the idle time, I have wanted to not work. How many Karl Marx's should I recite?" ;)

Is capitalism related to the social problem that makes so many people long for idleness (leisure)?

Social problem? Says you! I say, work makes people long for idleness.

I think that altruism functions very nicely on a large scale now. The taxes I pay are for Canadians in general, including, and most especially for, the crack addict in the lane. BC is a "have" province, so we redistribute money to the "have not" provinces. The Canadian people fought to bring in a welfare system, and we pay into it. Why?

It works for everybody. The more taxes we pay, the better it works. The capitalists argue for lower taxation. I argue for more.

Do you send in extra?
 
Knowltok,ur programm would be tested by programmers.For every new product u c on the market there was a marketing poll i think.U're explaining the theory of capitalism,not the reality.Poor people aren't poor because it's the market's law,read my post about the patents etc.They're prevented from being rich(the credit systems,the ****ty educational system in their districts.etc)
And roadwarrior,with the system i explained in my other post,i don't think people would be lazy.
 
Originally posted by Damien
Knowltok,ur programm would be tested by programmers.For every new product u c on the market there was a marketing poll i think.U're explaining the theory of capitalism,not the reality.Poor people aren't poor because it's the market's law,read my post about the patents etc.They're prevented from being rich(the credit systems,the ****ty educational system in their districts.etc)

And who are those programmers to tell me I don't have a right to pursue my dream of distributing my opperating system to all who will want it? (Assuming they don't find it brilliant ;))

Yes, patents cost money. Most legal work does, mainly because you need to protect yourself fro m the greedy rapacious nature of your fellow man who is more than happy to steal what was yours and live off the fruits of your labor. Have fun with him in communism.

True entrepreneurs are not held back by patent costs, they are encouraged by the patents. If you have a good idea, you can get it patented because someone else who also believes that you can succeed with your idea will lend you the money. Not a government agency handing out funds to whoever it feels like, but someone who is directly involved because it is their money. That assumption of risk comes at a price, and that is the credit system of which you refer.

As for the education system, there are people rising past that everyday. I firmly believe that it needs improved, but I doubt that communism would do it. Educational success is driven from the student's and the parent's desire for educational success. That is why throwing money at the problem has not solved it. That however is a topic for another thread.

The plain truth is that the world does not provide equal opportunity to everyone. It never has and it never will. Some people will be born into money, some will be born with better parents, some will be smarter, some stronger, etc. What capitalism does is allow everyone the opportunity to improve their situation or their children's through hard work, wise decisions, and possibly luck. You are taking a basic freedom away from people if you mandate that their will be no improvement, and there is no way of getting ahead. If you dream of a world where no one wants to get ahead, well then....you are dreaming.


To Davo: If you believe that communism is a very long way off, if it ever comes; and that you have no blueprint for what it will be, or how to achieve it, then what, in practical terms, does being a communist mean to you? I guess what I am asking is, how would a communist along your model (or lack thereof) differ in action from a person who did not think that the future held such a utopia, or a person who never really considered it much?
 
Originally posted by CurtSibling


Hah! Davo!
Greadius has you there, my lad!

The idea of communism too easly becomes a lash in the hand of beastly dictators...

I my view...no major nation is about to become the new USSR.
The whole idea is surreal.

Sorry, Davo.

:o

I am not a marxist-leninist, why would I want a new USSR?

:confused::confused::confused::confused:


I think that what ComradeDavo means is that he doesn't have an exact blueprint of what communism will look like; there isn't a plan that must be carried out.
yeah, thats right:)

To Davo: If you believe that communism is a very long way off, if it ever comes; and that you have no blueprint for what it will be, or how to achieve it, then what, in practical terms, does being a communist mean to you? I guess what I am asking is, how would a communist along your model (or lack thereof) differ in action from a person who did not think that the future held such a utopia, or a person who never really considered it much?
well firstly, I tell people about my beliefs etc to help people better understand what I am promoting.

And then I partake in disscussions such as this one so I can better understand people's train of thought, hey I actually listen to people's objections/problems with what i am saying and think about it. I try to have an open mind and stop myself becoming a propaganda machine!!!

Then I oppose things I see as bad on a pratical basis, for example I have signed the stop the War coalition's petition., or refusing to enter McDonalds or starbucks 9you eb surprised by the humber of people who ***** about multi-nationalism but then go spending their money in these places!) Nothing big, but important nothingless.

Being a communist is just a way of life to me, I have always been one, it is how I think. many people say human nature means communism will never happen, but being a communist is in my nature.

As Zappata once said, 'better to die on your feet than live on your knees'.

I'm only 17, so at the moment i've alot on my mind apart from politics, but perhaps when I am older I can make a difference, I ceartainally intend to try and do so.

I'd rather hope for a better future than except the grim reality of teh present.
 
Fair enough. :)

Don't assume though (not saying you did) that others don't also hope for a better future. I do. I don't view the present as a grim reality so much as I view it as much improved from the grim reality of the past. It still has a long way to go, but we have the model down for the most part, now we just need to apply it around the world.

:)
 
Originally posted by knowltok2


And who are those programmers to tell me I don't have a right to pursue my dream of distributing my opperating system to all who will want it? (Assuming they don't find it brilliant ;))

People avoiding you a great misery by being in debt if it's bad and people securing ur success without having to reimburse anyone if it's good.

Yes, patents cost money. Most legal work does, mainly because you need to protect yourself fro m the greedy rapacious nature of your fellow man who is more than happy to steal what was yours and live off the fruits of your labor. Have fun with him in communism.

Why do u have to pay to be protected?It should be a natural right.Do u have to pay your lawyer(some do to a have better protection)?The state should protect your patent without giving money itself.

True entrepreneurs are not held back by patent costs, they are encouraged by the patents. If you have a good idea, you can get it patented because someone else who also believes that you can succeed with your idea will lend you the money. Not a government agency handing out funds to whoever it feels like, but someone who is directly involved because it is their money. That assumption of risk comes at a price, and that is the credit system of which you refer.

What's the problem with govt agencies?In my system,there's NO risk.

As for the education system, there are people rising past that everyday. I firmly believe that it needs improved, but I doubt that communism would do it. Educational success is driven from the student's and the parent's desire for educational success. That is why throwing money at the problem has not solved it. That however is a topic for another thread.

Y wouldn't communism?My system would teach people to be involved.

The plain truth is that the world does not provide equal opportunity to everyone. It never has and it never will. Some people will be born into money, some will be born with better parents, some will be smarter, some stronger, etc.

One of the goals is equal opportunity so it's simply fatalism to say"na it's always been like that n will always be".

What capitalism does is allow everyone the opportunity to improve their situation or their children's through hard work, wise decisions, and possibly luck.

My grand-fathers were both dockers in Le Havre(Normandy) and believe me they worked hard.Yet they were still as poor as at the beginning.Y?Because the benefits were not re-distributed and they worked to survive.If women would be prevented from working,would you say"Hey they shouldn't complain;in Afghanistan they have to be veiled"

You are taking a basic freedom away from people if you mandate that their will be no improvement, and there is no way of getting ahead. If you dream of a world where no one wants to get ahead, well then....you are dreaming.

My system is all the contrary.Everyone would always get ahead and launch ideas for improvement.Y do only rich people have economic powers and politicians politic powers?In my system everyone has both.
 
ComradeDavo: "Being a communist is just a way of life to me, I have always been one, it is how I think."

And ComradeDavo lives in a democracy, and seems quite capable of influencing people with his views.:goodjob: So, communism is an active political force right now. Knowltok2 argues that we can't "magically level the playing field", and other capitalists here keep refering to some ridiculous communist revolution. This is silly. Stop it.

I live in a welfare state. The people here have been using our democratic system to level the playing field. Most of my countrymen like to tax the rich, and like public services over private ones. We are constantly at odds with our polititians who mostly get corrupted just like polititians in any country, and it frusterates us that they forget about the people who elected them. Basically, we're trying to expand what may as well be called socialism, in Canada. We are not plotting a revolution. We are working slowly towards communism, within the bounds of our democracy. Few Canadians would call themselves "communist", rather, they would identify themselves as supporters of a current political party. But the effect will be the same.

Do I send in extra taxes?:lol: Good one, no. But I do, as a citizen, support increased taxation and increased spending on social programs. We've managed to raise taxes steadily, I'm proud to say. Drives the Americans nuts.:p
 
Originally posted by Sean Lindstrom
So, communism is an active political force right now.
Not in my neck of the woods. Of course, people out here have their needs met without government support :crazyeye:

Originally posted by Sean Lindstrom
other capitalists here keep refering to some ridiculous communist revolution.
Individuals who share your ideology have commited mass atrocities aimed at me and my ilk in even recent history.
The fact that you are as willing to take our property and give it to someone else simply because of our status in life scares us. Your willingness to take anything from us for the sake of social engineering doesn't apply that you will take everything, but I see no logical limit as to what you might be willing to take to achieve your goals.

Originally posted by Sean Lindstrom
Most of my countrymen like to tax the rich, and like public services over private ones.
Don't speak for people who didn't elect you :p

Originally posted by Sean Lindstrom
We are constantly at odds with our polititians who mostly get corrupted just like polititians in any country, and it frusterates us that they forget about the people who elected them.
Doesn't it seem odd to you as the more wealth and prestige there is in politics, the more corrupt politics becomes. And, ironically, the more you rely on the government to participate in social engineering the more prestige and wealth you infuse them with.

Originally posted by Sean Lindstrom
Good one, no. But I do, as a citizen, support increased taxation and increased spending on social programs.
In other words you support increased taxation on other people. Isn't it amazing how easy it is to spend other people's money?
 
I'm not here to argue. I wanted to explain my own thoughts about communism, and show how socialism has improved the quality of life for all Canadians. Plainly, Greadius, you see this as a freak, a lie, or a red menace. Too bad.
 
A request for Damien: Please offset your comments in some way from mine or anyone elses you quote. It just makes it easier to read. :)

Damien: There is a risk in your system for the development of new products. It sounds like in your system the state pays the cost to see if a new product will work. It is one thing if it is cinnamon rolls, quite another if it is a new car I want to build. Let's even say that I am a competant enough engineer to design a working car. What if it is butt ugly? is the state going to produce this car and distribute it to the masses even though they don't want it? Or are they going to make a decision on the visual appeal of my design? If they do distribute it and no one likes it, and everyone gets to gether in a happy referrendum and votes to cancel the car program, all the machinery, materials, time and money have been wasted. That is risk.

As for most of the rest of your responses, they seem to go along the lines of: Everything will be perfect, because it is a utopia. Proof? Well because everything is perfect in an utopia. Circular logic.

Sean: So what you are telling me is that you believe it would be a good thing if your government had more money from the taxpayers, but you aren't willing to act on this unless everyone else has to pay their fair share? Sounds to me like you don't trust your fellow Canadians to be inspired by the principle of everyone doing their fair share. I think the reason you don't pay extra is because you know no one else will, and you won't get any benefit from paying extra. Looking for an individual return on your investment seems very capitalistic to me. ;)
 
Your car would be tested by 6,000 consumers(a sample of the pop).And it's not an utopia.An utopia is impossible to reach.
My system is just logical and plain simple.People are involved and lead the country(politically n economically).There's no risk and it'll never collapse except if an external element annihilate the whole pop.It's incredible how logic can be misled n illogical things can be taught as logical.Politically,my system is the swiss system(there are political parties in CH but as people have the right to launch refenda their powers are restricted and the parliaments are seen as constituted of experts launching counter-proposals and adaptations in refenda(the parliament often launch counter-proposals in refenda n initiatives).C,my political utopia is a reality for a while already.People should control the economy.
Popular sovereignty is political.We should achieve economical sovereignty as the state is led by economics,not pure air n water.
 
Originally posted by Damien
Your car would be tested by 6,000 consumers(a sample of the pop).And it's not an utopia.An utopia is impossible to reach.
My system is just logical and plain simple.People are involved and lead the country(politically n economically).There's no risk and it'll never collapse except if an external element annihilate the whole pop.It's incredible how logic can be misled n illogical things can be taught as logical.Politically,my system is the swiss system(there are political parties in CH but as people have the right to launch refenda their powers are restricted and the parliaments are seen as constituted of experts launching counter-proposals and adaptations in refenda(the parliament often launch counter-proposals in refenda n initiatives).C,my political utopia is a reality for a while already.People should control the economy.
Popular sovereignty is political.We should achieve economical sovereignty as the state is led by economics,not pure air n water.

And when my car is tested, it is possible that it will be rejected. If it is, the country is out the cost of setting up a plant to build six thousand cars and the cost of the cars themselves. Me, I'm out nothing. In fact, I'm going to design another car and try again. Get out your check book.

That is risk. The entire country has to take the risk that my car will or will not be any good. And to be fair, they have to do it for everyone who is capable of coming up with a design for a car. When you get 10,000 designs for a car, will you ask the people to pay for 6,000,000 cars as a test? What about next year when you get 10,000 new designs? Keep in mind that some of these will be true improvements. Is your system going to be able to support 6,000,000 cars per year, 6M boats per year, 6M planes per year, etc.?

Also, how will it be determined what is going to be produced? Is someone going to decide that 14 types of cereal is enough and that it is not economical to produce the 15th?

You can't just blandly state that your system is without risk and that it will never collapse without backing that up some. A system that is without risk is a utopia, and you're going to have to do better to convince me to believe in those.
 
people workin in the automobile industry would say if your new improvements are worth being considered or if it's just fake.About pure style n design,No need to produce cars.Just show the images to consumers.The same for political matters.People couldn't launch X times the same initiative if datas haven't changed.
 
Back
Top Bottom