Death Penalty, do you EVER support it (With Poll)

Do you EVER support the Death Penalty? When

  • I support the death Penalty for anyone who commits a felony

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    91
Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
22,750
Location
Wherever my name is posted
OK, this thread is to do two things, to be a poll to see who supports death as punishment under what circumstances and to debate the topic.

Alright, I do understand the opinions for and against death in general for punishment. I also am pointing out there's a lot of scripture in favor of the death penalty. As most of you don't recognize the Bible as valid I will keep those out of my argument. If you do believe the Bible or am willing to accept the Bible as evidence I will add them.

First, I ask this: To the generally opposing or always opposing:

I understand people make mistakes. I mean both the cold-blooded killer might not have premeditated the crime and it might have been a decent person who got angry at the wrong time. While I do not support withholding justice, which demands murders should die IMO, I understand the opinion that they are decent people that made a bad decision, and I understand why society might not want to kill them. As for premeditated murder, in general, I understand even still you might preach rehabilitation or not be willing to kill on "Reasonable doubt."

However, what should be done to cold-blooded killers like Hitler and Stalin, had we captured them, or someone like Osama Bin Laden. We know not beyond reasonable doubt, but beyond all doubt that they were guilty of heinous crimes. If God can save them (He can but part of me kinda hopes he won't, even though its wrong) he can save them on their way to death. Do you support letting them rot behind bars for the rest of their lives, and making the families millions they made suffer pay taxes so that they can live, even if uncomfortably?

As for other murderers, while I sort of understand the anti-death crowds views, I'd like to see some of them so I can see if I can refute them. I'd also like reinforcement for the pro-death position if you do support it.

EDIT: I'm more or less #7, except I think assault and armed robbery can mandate it depending on circumstances, and mass treachery such as the CSA shouldn't get death (If you call it treachery, but don't debate that.)
 
I support the death penalty for all murders. I don't support it lightly or take any pleasure in seeing such sentences carried out.
 
I don't think the state should be employing executioners, let the murderer free market decide.
 
I support the death penalty for all murders. I don't support it lightly or take any pleasure in seeing such sentences carried out.

I don't see pleasure in it either, but I see letting murderers live as the ultimate disgrace to human life actually. Not executing murderers because "It's wrong to kill" puts more honor on the murderer than the victim. I would not say the same if it were not enacted for such practical considerations as not wishing to execute innocents or saving money, though I see ways around the second problem.

I don't think the state should be employing executioners, let the murderer free market decide.

:lol:

Seriously though, one of the few jobs of the government is to punish crime.

Seriously though, what's your opinion.

I would rather die than rot in a cell. Jails are not fun places, and it is possible that the person could be proven not guilty later on.

Well, for obvious users of genocide like Hitler, I'd honestly put him through a concentration camp or something (I'm not kidding.)

For most murders though, see my other comments.
 
I would rather die than rot in a cell. Jails are not fun places, and it is possible that the person could be proven not guilty later on.

This. When you're dead you don't have to suffer anymore; and murderers deserve to suffer for their crimes. And for the thousand murderers that are killed, some are innocent - I don't really care how many murderers get killed, if one innocent slips by the system is atrocious.
 
This. When you're dead you don't have to suffer anymore; and murderers deserve to suffer for their crimes. And for the thousand murderers that are killed, some are innocent - I don't really care how many murderers get killed, if one innocent slips by the system is atrocious.

First off, you can't give the years back you took in jail either.

With all the appeals and so on, I'm willing to bet more people die from offenders who break out and kill more than people who are falsely convicted. Also, what about the innocents that are murdered?

Also I ask this question:

Would you support, if the Allies had captured Hitler, locking him up and made the families of the millions he brutally murdered support him via taxes so he could eat and have a place to stay?
 
It's IMMORAL and UNBIBLICAL for the federal government to use capital punishment. But as a firm proponent of states' rights, I believe that states should have the rights to execute people for whatever reason they like (that's what it says in the 10th amendment after all). I hate big government and if the federal government every tries to violate states rights to kill THEIR OWN citizens then that would constitute big government (it's in the 10th amendment, really).
 
That was 60 years ago, Domination, and it's a ridiculous hypothesis.

I personally do not support capital punishment in any way, shape or form and I find it strange to think that so-called "pro-lifers" would so roundly praise capital punishment.
 
First off, you can't give the years back you took in jail either.

I know, but it's better to take a few years than an entire LIFE.

With all the appeals and so on, I'm willing to bet more people die from offenders who break out and kill more than people who are falsely convicted.

Seriously, how many people break out of prison? And they don't necessarily kill again; in fact they probley won't unless they just like killing, which is pretty uncommon for murderers.

Also, what about the innocents that are murdered?

What about them? It's not like the State could do anything about that; they can do something about the possiblity of false convictions.

Also I ask this question:

Would you support, if the Allies had captured Hitler, locking him up and made the families of the millions he brutally murdered support him via taxes so he could eat and have a place to stay?

Yes, I would. It's not like it's a lot of taxes, probley less than a penny for most people, a lot of whom would be glad to pay to let their offender suffer.
 
It's IMMORAL and UNBIBLICAL for the federal government to use capital punishment. But as a firm proponent of states' rights, I believe that states should have the rights to execute people for whatever reason they like (that's what it says in the 10th amendment after all). I hate big government and if the federal government every tries to violate states rights to kill THEIR OWN citizens then that would constitute big government (it's in the 10th amendment, really).

Umm... Are you inviting me to use the Bible, because I will if you will accept it as having value.

That was 60 years ago, Domination, and it's a ridiculous hypothesis.

I personally do not support capital punishment in any way, shape or form and I find it strange to think that so-called "pro-lifers" would so roundly praise capital punishment.

Ummm... I believe in the sanctity of life. If you deprive someone else of life you lose your own.

Also, the reason I support it for rape is because it can do so much harm to a person as to be equal to killing them.

@El Machine: Can you please state your opinion? "State in Post" should have been added to other.

@Mango Elephant- If they were actually going to torture people like Hitler I might buy it. Rotting in prison isn't real suffering. Its punishment surely, but that's like comparing a spanking (Let's assume it was a hard one) to a time-out. Both are punishment, and in some situations a time-out may be warranted, but time out is just a punishment, a hard spanking actually causes pain.
 
Ummm... I believe in the sanctity of life. If you deprive someone else of life you lose your own.
So who executes the executioner and who executes them?
 
So who executes the executioner and who executes them?

This is actually funny, and reminds me of a question by Paradigmshifter about who administers the lethal injections becuase the doctors can't due to hippocratic oath:lol:

The answer to your question is as follows: The murderer Unlawfully, both morally and legally, took life. The executioner is given the legal right to kill the murderer, and so he does. The executioner is innocent.

As for Hitler, yes what he did was legal, but its so immoral the US can and should have executed him anyway if they'd got him. Or let Stalin torture him, then capture and torture Stalin too:lol:

@Azzaman333 :lol: I knew this was coming eventually, hence my specification in option 9 (Which I still never expected to get picked but still needed to have it.) You realize everyone who has driven would be dead right?

I'm gonna assume it was a joke.
 
Umm... Are you inviting me to use the Bible, because I will if you will accept it as having value.
umm of course. These people on this site may not be Trve Conservatives® like us, but as we know, the Bible is the foundation of American government, and this is coming from our Founding Fathers. I mean why would Jefferson write about Divine Providence and our Creator in the declaration of independence if he wasn't a Bible believing Christian?

Talking about politics is meaningless unless you have divine guidance, I mean look at all these so called "rational" people who waste their time thinking and weighing pros and cons of issues. Man's logic is flawed, but the Bible trumps logic and is the basis of all morality, why lean on your earthly understanding when GOD clearly already did all the thinking for us! When talking about issues like the death penalty, or abortion, or gay marriage we should just refer to their respective passages in the Bible and bypass idle analysis. (I mean it's in the 10th amendment anyway)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom