Definition of sentience?

Is humanity more sentient than animals?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 31 77.5%
  • No.

    Votes: 4 10.0%
  • I dunno.

    Votes: 5 12.5%

  • Total voters
    40

superslug

Still hatin' on Khan
Moderator
Hall of Fame Staff
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
11,597
Location
The Farm
I personally believe that human beings, while animals, are also more-that our species is at a higher level of existence than the rest of the animal kingdom due to our sentience. Yet when I read the various definitions of sentience, I see many qualifications that could also be argued for animals.

So, the first question is, do you believe mankind has a level of sentience distinct from all other known species? And if so, what differentiates us from them? What is unique about us above all else?
 
Sentience: we tell ourselves we're better than animals.
 
I suppose animals could be sorted into a hierarchy of sentience, with humans at or near the top. It's seems pretty clear to me that the sentience gap between a chimp and a human is much smaller than that 'tween a sponge and a chimp.
 
Well, humans are definitely LESS sentient than animals when it comes to predicting natural disasters.

Sentience = awareness, yes?

So I don't think it's 100-0 to humans.
 
CruddyLeper said:
Well, humans are definitely LESS sentient than animals when it comes to predicting natural disasters.

Sentience = awareness, yes?

So I don't think it's 100-0 to humans.
Reminds me of all the animals and birds that ran from the beaches last December. But is that really sentience? Or more instinct?
 
I think it's sentience. They are aware of an event before it has happened.

Refusing to label behaviour as sentience because it happens in non-humans is surely just prejudice?
 
We can detect natural disasters, its called noise, sonar, and radar, and other modern equipment
 
Stylesjl said:
We can detect natural disasters, its called noise, sonar, and radar, and other modern equipment

Yes - but we CAN'T PREDICT THEM!
 
Are you sure it's prediction? It's possible they knew it was coming.
 
superslug said:
Are you sure it's prediction? It's possible they knew it was coming.

What is the difference? You predict something, you know it's going to happen.
 
CruddyLeper said:
What is the difference? You predict something, you know it's going to happen.
I'm trying to figure out what your point is. We can predict natural disasters, and in a lot of cases better than animals.
 
superslug said:
I'm trying to figure out what your point is. We can predict natural disasters, and in a lot of cases better than animals.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

By the time you know an earthquake's happening, all the local wildlife is over the horizon.
 
CruddyLeper said:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

By the time you know an earthquake's happening, all the local wildlife is over the horizon.
I didn't say all cases. :rolleyes:
 
Is it possible to define our singular sentience by our ability to exist in areas "unnatural" to us? i.e. travel to polar regions, under water, outerspace, etc...
 
If sentience scaled from 0 to 100, every creature on earth would score 0 or 1 :p
 
We are certainly more sentient than animals, but sentience itself is difficult to define (like life). Is a PNA, RNA, or DNA molecule that reproduces itself sentient? How about a single cell? A Volvox colony? What about smile molds, mice, cats, dolphins, and chimps? What about humans? I know plenty of people who don't seem to think very much.
 
I define sentience as self-awareness. If a being knows it exists and tries to continue existing, then it is sentient.

Humans are more sentient than animals I suppose, but animals are sentient as well.
 
How do you know (other) animals are not sentient? Have you swapped bodies with them or something? :confused:
 
Their brains are not advanced enough to attain human levels of sentience.
 
Back
Top Bottom