Daghdha
Absent Minded
This is his reply:
And here's my answer to that:
Spoiler :
Hey sorry for the turbulence, but we feel wronged here.
We are suggesting that MIA and KISS has educated Doughnut on your findings through this trial, thus strengthening their analytical situation, even before you made the first galley or even found our continent.
That is one way too see "Spirit of the game". We have some very valid reason admins are aware of, which is not what you may think.
I was strictly referring to that our two continents never met, yet you meddled in our continental situation by educating Team Doughnut through this misguided case. I see this as a means to work diplomatically through game admin rulings, which may not be the intention, but surely the real outcome and campaign for some of you. So far, Team KISS is not considered accountable for anything in our camp, and that anarchy structure does not allow clear channels and mandates of responsibility.
For now, I think we should concentrate on our continents and not worry about the ruling at hand.
We may give a statement when the ruling is complete. As you know, I am not a dictator on this team, we poll most things, and it was some polls on some unrelated things that caused all this.
I hope this does not kill diplomacy, but we are prepared for that situation too. I hope this will go over.
Yours sincerely
P
Spoiler :
Hi P
Okiedookie then. You felt we wanted to make a point to D'nuts about TNT's moves and used the ruling thread for that purpous. If that would be the case then, if what you state is true, we have miseducated Nuts , i.e. KISS has interpreteded the situation wrongly. The winner in that case is TNT so congrats . If the Nutters are daft enough to rely on others (poor) intelligence, that's their loss isn't it? What I do not know is how you're supposed to raise a question on rulings that concerns all teams if you're not allowed to use the main thread.
The reason you did whatever you did are of course hidden to us and that's the "problem" when we engage in arguments in the main thread. We, as well as you and others, make our comments based on what we "think" has happend. It might be correct, but then again, it might not. We have to live with that.
Finally, if anyone is stupid enough to "kill diplomacy" some 40 turns into the game, he deserves to die .
Regards
Daghie
Okiedookie then. You felt we wanted to make a point to D'nuts about TNT's moves and used the ruling thread for that purpous. If that would be the case then, if what you state is true, we have miseducated Nuts , i.e. KISS has interpreteded the situation wrongly. The winner in that case is TNT so congrats . If the Nutters are daft enough to rely on others (poor) intelligence, that's their loss isn't it? What I do not know is how you're supposed to raise a question on rulings that concerns all teams if you're not allowed to use the main thread.
The reason you did whatever you did are of course hidden to us and that's the "problem" when we engage in arguments in the main thread. We, as well as you and others, make our comments based on what we "think" has happend. It might be correct, but then again, it might not. We have to live with that.
Finally, if anyone is stupid enough to "kill diplomacy" some 40 turns into the game, he deserves to die .
Regards
Daghie