@IbnSina
that must have been the most off-topic post ever.
i don't care who Moonsinger or anyone else is. i am not calling anyone a cheater, or a bad player. none of us are. the skill of Moonsinger at Civ3 is so irrelevant i cannot even try to understand ow this could be brought up in the discussion, let us drop this asap.
@Wacken
WackenOpenAir said:
Should you be forced to play every game till the very end when you already know you aren't gonna win, or maybe even know you will be destroyed by the AI ?
once and for all, PLEASE PEOPLE, read what we write. NONE of us (BlackJAC, Rohili, and myself) EVER said that or something approaching. we've been misquoted sicne the beginning of the thread... our point is NOT that you should play to the end, or start and play a game of Sid on a 25 square squares (^^) tundra island.
our point is that RESTARTING the game in order to have a BETTER start is a form of tweaking/abusing/cheating the game to GET what you didn't get in the beginning. and SO is reloading when your tank loses to a spear (^^) or when you unintentionally moved the worker or when you forgot to prevent riots.
to clear it definitely i hope: i DO restart when the starts don't seem fun, and i DO reload when something like a riot happens, or when i forgot to go through the tedious MM of my settler factory for the Zth turn.
@Moonsinger
nothing personal, but the math example is totally irrelevant. unless there's a hidden ethics when dealing with math problems that i was not aware of when i studied it.
Moonsinger said:
So much for a good start, right?
then if so, why didn't you play the first start ? please, be honest: if you use another start, it is because you think you'll get a better game, otherwise you wouldn't go through the trouble. also, humans benefit much more from advantages than the AI cause they can manage them in the most effective manner. we already see that humans can beat Sid "easily", even though the AI gets tremendous advantages. if all the AI and the Human were given +10kPO at the beginning, the human would benefit much more of it than the AI. this is the same for the start: no matter how good a start the AI will get, it will ruin part of it due to bad coding, while the human will maximize the efficiency.
and to stress it once again, if you genuinely did not think that it improves your chances to win the game, you would not bother restarting or going through N iterations to find a map that suits the parameters you entered.
EDIT:
Moonsinger said:
Well, I don't really mind what people think of me. I'm just trying to defend a utility like MapFinder that does no harm and break no rule.
this has nothing to do with the topic... i really don't think anything of you, good or bad. i don't have the pleasure to know you. but this is beyond the point. and we are not "attacking" MapFinder, which is a great utility. we are not saying it is cheating by the rules of the HoF etc, since it is clearly allowed.
however, we are saying that, people who say these two things basically contradict themselves and their reasonning:
- restarting until i get 6 cows and all-river tiles is ok and it's not cheating.
- reloading when you accidentally move a worker/forget to prevent riots/get humiliated by the RNG is bad.
also, i read many times that "not reloading helps you improve". it is certainly very true. but then, coping with whatever start you have does help you improve, i'm sure.