Duplicate Leaders/civs
- Thread starter remake20
- Start date
SilentConfusion
Emperor
Is this supposed to be a poll?
I'd probably say it's ok to allow duplicates.
I'd probably say it's ok to allow duplicates.
remake20
:)
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2008
- Messages
- 4,901
Yes, but it posts the thread and then takes you to the poll creation
So you see the thread before the poll is made. It's stupid though.Loev
Warlord
You will have be first (F5 spamming) to get the faction/leader you want. Not very fair.
Calis
on time
I don't like the thought of two (or more) teams having the same civ/leader!
SilentConfusion
Emperor
What is meant by this?
Loev
Warlord
Sorry for my poor english. What I mean is: When two teams want to same leader/civ the team that is faster gets the leader/civ only because they where faster. So I voted YES.
SilentConfusion
Emperor
No worries about the English. My Dutch is far worse than your English.
In the situation where there might be one leader voted on as first choice by multiple teams, I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be a matter of who is faster. If we don't allow duplicate civs, there would be some other criteria for which team got it other than who voted first.
I voted yes for duplicate leaders, but just wanted to point out that if we choose no, I don't think we'll have the issue suggested here about racing to get the leader you want.
remake20
:)
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2008
- Messages
- 4,901
Calis
on time
I am against cloning 
No serious, the only reason is that it feels wrong for me to have the same person or country twice on one world.
Just a matter of feeling. No hard facts.
No serious, the only reason is that it feels wrong for me to have the same person or country twice on one world.
Just a matter of feeling. No hard facts.
SilentConfusion
Emperor
Okay, I just seemed like you didn't have a reason for saying that
I think Calis is saying that it's an aesthetic preference.
Calis
on time
wideyedwanderer
Prince
I am against cloning
No serious, the only reason is that it feels wrong for me to have the same person or country twice on one world.
Just a matter of feeling. No hard facts.
Agreed.
Me too
nabaxo
King
I vote no.
Gingi
Warlord
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2010
- Messages
- 102
I vote no.
It'd be weird if Washington declares war on Roosevelt, if not for the reason that Washington died 60 years before Roosevelt was born, then because they're kinda both American.
No I'm just kidding, that's not why. I just don't like having two Chinese civs right next to each other on the map. It would get confusing and sloppy. Also it doesn't seem very practical to have two of the teams be the same civ/leader when there are six teams and 26 civs / 42 leaders to choose from. Can you imagine how annoying it would be to play with THREE of the teams be the same civ? EDIT: I know it's unlikely, but even two would get annoying after 2000 BC.
It'd be weird if Washington declares war on Roosevelt, if not for the reason that Washington died 60 years before Roosevelt was born, then because they're kinda both American.
No I'm just kidding, that's not why. I just don't like having two Chinese civs right next to each other on the map. It would get confusing and sloppy. Also it doesn't seem very practical to have two of the teams be the same civ/leader when there are six teams and 26 civs / 42 leaders to choose from. Can you imagine how annoying it would be to play with THREE of the teams be the same civ? EDIT: I know it's unlikely, but even two would get annoying after 2000 BC.
Similar threads
