Earth 2100

Narz

keeping it real
Joined
Jun 1, 2002
Messages
31,514
Location
Haverhill, UK
You can watch Earth 2100 here (containing some ads)

Earth 2100 follows a fictional character named Lucy (born in 2009) thru the remainder of the 21st century. The storyboard style timeline of her life is broken up by brief explanations of the scenarios & historical sidenotes from various experts (authors, scholars & scientists).

I watched it last night & was a bit disappointed by it overall, though I think it might be a good starter for people unfamiliar with many of the issues it tackles. It was sweet to see Joesph Tainter in the flesh (the author of Collapse of Complex Societies, a great book which I read cover to cover, much more readable & concise than Jared Diamond's book who also appears in the film) and guys like Richard Heinburg on mainstream TV but I'm not a big fan of the quality of the production (graphics, scenes chosen) and the timeline seemed a bit unrealistic (overly optimistic) & it was very UScentric (some talk about events happening in other nations but not a realistic sense of how this would effect the US, I found the idea of a perfect ecotopia in New York City [2060] while much of the rest of the world is in ruins to be unlikely). I don't think it really drove home how dependent we our on the globalized economy and, I think, promoted too much the idea that other countries (and even parts of the US) can crumble but some cities (New York as an example here until 2070something anyway, IIRC) will still be ok.

Definitely worth a watch though.

Cheers,
Narz :king:
 
Already a thread on Home.
 
Oh thanks, missed it. I guess they can get merged or I can alter my OP/thread title to just be about Earth 2100.
 
Entertaining, but I don't take my science cues from a show designed to keep people entertained long enough to see the commercials.
 
...it was very UScentric (some talk about events happening in other nations but not a realistic sense of how this would effect the US, I found the idea of a perfect ecotopia in New York City [2060] while much of the rest of the world is in ruins to be unlikely).

Ironically, the video is US only.
 
So, where do people think we'll end up in 2100?

My entire answer is based on what happens with regards to our environmental policy.
By 2100, we could be sustainably in space, if we're wise. Or we could be grinding in ecological poverty, in overcrowded northern countries, using VR as a mental escape.
 
I doubt it. Sounds like an oxymoron actually. How do you envision us being "sustainably in space" (growing food, reproducing, etc.)?

Well, our technological and industrial progress can continue, even if we reduce our footprint. Intellectual output per unit of pollution can rise, even if pollution is not rising.

And getting people into space is mostly an extrapolation of current industrial trends. We're at the stage, today, where millionaires are able to purchase trips to space. If we allow a 2% industrial advancement rate, the number of people who're able to go to space will continue to rise.

All that's needed, now, is a reason. When either the Moon or a Near Earth Asteroid becomes economically feasible, things will snowball.

There's lot of room for progress, if we figure out sustainability.
 
A trip to space is a far cry from living there. The only way I can imagine it is if we figure out a way to transfer "human consciousness" from the soft spongy tissue of the brain into some sort of robot that needs neither food nor water nor air (only a battery change every twenty years perhaps & a regular oiling a la tinman). Even then it still won't be the same as having "humans" in space.
 
Look at the bright side, if we screw up Earth, interplanetary and interstellar travel will become cost-effective. :lol:
 
A trip to space is a far cry from living there. The only way I can imagine it is if we figure out a way to transfer "human consciousness" from the soft spongy tissue of the brain into some sort of robot that needs neither food nor water nor air (only a battery change every twenty years perhaps & a regular oiling a la tinman). Even then it still won't be the same as having "humans" in space.

At that point, they'd cease to be human.
 
You really need to lighten up aelf, you're sighing over all the wrong things.

Like what? Maybe you need to lighten up, coz it's not like I'm really affected by this :crazyeye:
 
Back
Top Bottom