Esteemed Amazonian allies.
We thank you indeed for informing us of the brewing situation. I had noticed the somewhat ridiculous settling pattern of the CDZ-Quatronia peninsula (our name for it is "Hoag", I will use this name from now on unless I hear of a more official title), as well as the fact that they seemed to be settling it in preference to settling the M&M peninsulas. I had also noticed that they had been a little unreliable in their claimed tech path by switching to technologies on the music line. However, I, and as far as I can tell the rest of the team, had failed to put the pieces together, so we appreciate you filling us in.
We appreciate and thank you for your efforts to bring the alliance back in order. We will give our support to the proposals made, although having only been included as a BCC in the proposal sent (which I am not disputing the wisdom of) this does not seem to me to involve us saying anything for the moment.
We would however like you all to consider the following.
The ETTT's benefit is to propel four teams to a substantial technology lead, at the expense of the remaining two. Once those two rivals have been eliminated, the ETTT will naturally come to an end. We need to consider what will happen afterwards. We would assume that our strong alliance and friendship, supported by the ASP, would remain. We had also previously also assumed that CDZ and Quatronia would stick together as well, having made a close alliance themselves and encouraged to band together by the Amazon and Sirius alliance. This would then lead to a fair fight between north and south, eventually followed by a fair race to victory between us and yourselves once we were the only teams remaining, which seemed like a good enough prospect for us.
However, one thing which would be substantially better for both of us than a fair fight between north and south, would be to see a great deal of infighting in the south, while we, with our close co-operation and good co-ordination, steamroll over the lot of them. As such, we would question the merits of doing too good a job of healing the rift between CDZ and Quatronia. This division has risks, but could also be a great opportunity for us in the long run.
We would argue that when it comes to the ETTT giving us a significant technology lead over M&M, sufficient to defeat them, it has already substantially done its job. Indeed there is already dissention among our team when it comes to the wisdom of continuing to trade away the GNP lead we have to more than half of our rivals, and exactly what the right time to dissolve the ETTT is going to be.
The one thing however that we absolutely need to avoid is one of CDZ or Quatronia gifting a large number of technologies, the fruits of the ETTT, to one of M&M. I say "gifting" and "large number" with reason though. A fair beaker trading agreement between
one southern ex-ETTT member and
one of M&M would not for example constitute a threat, as it would preserve our existing technology lead, which should still be sufficient for us to defeat our M&M rivals. Given the weaker negotiating position of M&M it would be crazy for either of CDZ or Quatronia to agree to anything stronger than that. However, as foolish as it might seem, we agree that this prospect of gifting of technologies outside the ETT is still a considerable risk that we need to take seriously.
So, we see the priority as being to reach an agreement which ensures that the technology lead we have established is not given away to either of M&M. We acknowledge that healing the rift between CDZ and Quatronia, is one quite effective method of acheiving this. However, it is not necessarily the only way. We hope that you can see the arguments we have made in favour of some rift between those teams remaining, and take that into consideration when arbitrating their dispute.
This all does also bring into focus the need to ensure our own peninsula of Anjennida does not lead to similar problems. We would like to let you know that we are hopefully only a couple of turns from capturing Carib. We would also be glad to hear your thoughts on the generous proposal we have made for the settling agreement, although we are happy to allow you whatever time you require to consider it.
Best regards,

Irgy, on behalf of Team Sirius