Discussion in 'Civ4 - General Discussions' started by Xineoph, Jan 5, 2006.
Other than that, definetly vikings
O AND CANADA SUCKS COCK!!!
This is a really old thread. Please don't bump it.
when are the decisions coming in? im curious... by the way... does anyone know what the Civ. disk 2 is for?
I've always wanted to see the Phonecians and the Polynesians, the Etruscans, the Magyars, the Sassanians, The Zimbabwe, and as they excavate, the Atacamainians of Peru for other civs.
what happened to the Carthaginians in IV?
playing Gandhi as an aggressor makes me wince. let's have Shah Jehan instead!
i also wish there was a switch in later versions like in II where you could specify the level of Barbarian activity.
this is my first post...hello community : )
Please let this thread die an honourable death. It's 3 years old and is discussing civs that were to be included in the very first expansion I believe. Firaxis is done with this game, no more expansions so no more new civs. And jay, Carthage is in the game. I believe as of BtS.
LMAO, I almost fell off my chair!
Carthage are Phoenicians. It's all messed up, Carthage was a colony of the Phoenicians.
The "Carthage" civ should be called Phoenicia.
Just like "Viking" civ should be called Scandinavian.
Just like the US was a colony of Britain at one point?
The Carthaginian Empire is different than referring to the Phoenician Empire and refers to after Tyre fell to the Babylonians. It's justified to classify Carthage and Phoenicia separately.
Three years old people. Let it go.
People here need their welcoming!
Welcome to the Forums, Rockarockalrot, ashpond and jayhawkden.
Moderator Action: this one has run its course - if you want to propose new civs for future iterations - visit the Civ Ideas subforum
Separate names with a comma.