I feel that, for the moment, we should regard Cathy as a trading partner, and maintain a degree of cautiousness. If we run into their capital in the near future, we may want to try a gamble by attacking it with our lone elite warrior.
French Foreign Office, Term One
- Thread starter Stuck_as_a_Mac
- Start date
I agree to the first part of what he who censored the stick man of Coventry says, but I think we should use overwhelming force instead. I guess it really depends on how far Russia's core is from our borders though....
Also, it looks like we re doing a good trade - netting 3 techs for 2 techs and some gold
Link to poll by the Tech minister: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=75587
Also, it looks like we re doing a good trade - netting 3 techs for 2 techs and some gold
Link to poll by the Tech minister: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=75587
Stuck_as_a_Mac
Aptenodytes forsteri
I voted in that poll. I chose the option with the 2 and 18g for 3.
GenMarshall
High Elven ISB Capt & Ghost Agent
Two Ministry of Defense sponsered threads and polls
I wish for the FAs office to partisipate in the following polls and discussion threads.
Military Poll: Unit Quantity
Military Discussion: Attack Russia or no?
I wish for the FAs office to partisipate in the following polls and discussion threads.
Military Poll: Unit Quantity
Military Discussion: Attack Russia or no?
ravensfire
Member of the Opposition
Minister,
The sighting of Russian troops brings with it the (slim) risk of an arrogant neighbor, more concerned with short term gain through intimidation and terror than long term prosperity through trade and commerce.
How soon do we need to start evaluating our level of tolerance for these demands? I feel it is too early right now, but don't want to wait too long.
Thanks!
-- Ravensfire
The sighting of Russian troops brings with it the (slim) risk of an arrogant neighbor, more concerned with short term gain through intimidation and terror than long term prosperity through trade and commerce.
How soon do we need to start evaluating our level of tolerance for these demands? I feel it is too early right now, but don't want to wait too long.
Thanks!
-- Ravensfire
Sir SaaM
I would like to express some concern regarding tomorrow's turnchat
My grandmother, who is turning 85, is having people over for cake, me included, and thus may prevent me from attending the scheduled T/C
I have read your T/C instructions, and I believe are most satisfactory even without our presence, but I would like your opinion on the issue.
Paalikles, Deputy Moron
I would like to express some concern regarding tomorrow's turnchat
My grandmother, who is turning 85, is having people over for cake, me included, and thus may prevent me from attending the scheduled T/C
I have read your T/C instructions, and I believe are most satisfactory even without our presence, but I would like your opinion on the issue.
Paalikles, Deputy Moron
Sir SaaM,
From what I was informed after managing to attend the turnchat at about 00:00 AM GMT+1, our President had already met the Babylonians 2 turns ago, and not halted the turnchat
As deputy, I do not wish to decide upon a possible CC, as the President clearly has not abliged to the instructions posted by the Ministry. I will leave this to the FA leader.
For proof, I hereby quote a passage from the T/C:
>[00:04] +Paalikles: how many turns since babs were met?
>[00:04] +plexus: hmm
>[00:04] !Chieftess: 2
Reason given for this: math was to be completed in 2 turns at the time the Babylonians were met
After some discussion, I ve come to the conclusion that the proper procedure should be a CC
EDIT2: After some more discussion, I realize I cannot have an opinion on whether a CC is in order. I do not know the law well enough.
Here is the log: http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads6/#turnchat_210104.txt
I ll also leave for you an excerpt of a PCMW with the President:
[00:10] Paalikles: I am writing up a message to SaaM
[00:10] Paalikles: I do not consider it to be a severe fault that the instructions were overlooked for science purposes
[00:10] RikMeleet: ok. I realise I was wrong. It just passed me by completely.
[00:11] Paalikles: but as far as I understand the rules, it would be proper procedure
[00:12] RikMeleet: yes it is. I've broken a law, so I should be charged.
[00:12] Paalikles: well - I guess I ll have to do it then
[00:13] Paalikles: it is unfortunate though
[00:13] RikMeleet: I'd never think I'd overlook that.
[00:13] RikMeleet: But I have no bad feelings, I committed a crime; I should be trialled.
[00:13] RikMeleet: Poor judiciary.
[00:14] Paalikles: well - compared to the CG investigation, I guess you ll be let of rather easily tho
[00:15] RikMeleet: I can always say I followed instructions; we only met a RED WARRIOR, and that was excluded
[00:16] Paalikles: Make friends and if we meet a new civ (not just the border, or the Red Warrior), stop the chat <--- that wording would make it difficult tho
Paalikles, FA deputy
EDIT: I ve just learned that the babs were indeed red - and this may change things a bit
From what I was informed after managing to attend the turnchat at about 00:00 AM GMT+1, our President had already met the Babylonians 2 turns ago, and not halted the turnchat
As deputy, I do not wish to decide upon a possible CC, as the President clearly has not abliged to the instructions posted by the Ministry. I will leave this to the FA leader.
For proof, I hereby quote a passage from the T/C:
>[00:04] +Paalikles: how many turns since babs were met?
>[00:04] +plexus: hmm
>[00:04] !Chieftess: 2
Reason given for this: math was to be completed in 2 turns at the time the Babylonians were met
After some discussion, I ve come to the conclusion that the proper procedure should be a CC
EDIT2: After some more discussion, I realize I cannot have an opinion on whether a CC is in order. I do not know the law well enough.
Here is the log: http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads6/#turnchat_210104.txt
I ll also leave for you an excerpt of a PCMW with the President:
[00:10] Paalikles: I am writing up a message to SaaM
[00:10] Paalikles: I do not consider it to be a severe fault that the instructions were overlooked for science purposes
[00:10] RikMeleet: ok. I realise I was wrong. It just passed me by completely.
[00:11] Paalikles: but as far as I understand the rules, it would be proper procedure
[00:12] RikMeleet: yes it is. I've broken a law, so I should be charged.
[00:12] Paalikles: well - I guess I ll have to do it then
[00:13] Paalikles: it is unfortunate though
[00:13] RikMeleet: I'd never think I'd overlook that.
[00:13] RikMeleet: But I have no bad feelings, I committed a crime; I should be trialled.
[00:13] RikMeleet: Poor judiciary.
[00:14] Paalikles: well - compared to the CG investigation, I guess you ll be let of rather easily tho
[00:15] RikMeleet: I can always say I followed instructions; we only met a RED WARRIOR, and that was excluded
[00:16] Paalikles: Make friends and if we meet a new civ (not just the border, or the Red Warrior), stop the chat <--- that wording would make it difficult tho
Paalikles, FA deputy
EDIT: I ve just learned that the babs were indeed red - and this may change things a bit
I am wondering where in our laws the power to call for an end to the chat was given to the FA department. Had this instruction been supported by a poll, it would be different. However, since there was no poll, I see no reason to file a CC.
Stuck_as_a_Mac
Aptenodytes forsteri
He apologised. I don't blame him for foregting. You had your grandmothers birthday to attend (send her this Head Morons regards) and I got yelled at by a choreographer for ten min. FA was not present and it was an honest mistake. I will NOT be filing charges, because he stopped after the issue was brought up. Now, I'd just like to move on and see what Hammy has to offer for us.
SaaM
Who isnt filing charges
SaaM
Who isnt filing charges
Well - that is a fine descision IMHO
Anyway - over to work:
I ve just taken the liberty to create a discussion thread in the Citizen forum, where I want to hear the people's opinion on foreign relations.
Paalikles, happy that no CC was filed
Anyway - over to work:
I ve just taken the liberty to create a discussion thread in the Citizen forum, where I want to hear the people's opinion on foreign relations.
Paalikles, happy that no CC was filed
donsig
Low level intermediary
Dear FA Morons,
How did we meet Babylon? I see no Babylonians on the map. I see a yellow border across the water to the northwest. Has anyone actually seen one of these so-called Babylonians? Are their lands seperated from our by water or can we walk to Babylon?
How did we meet Babylon? I see no Babylonians on the map. I see a yellow border across the water to the northwest. Has anyone actually seen one of these so-called Babylonians? Are their lands seperated from our by water or can we walk to Babylon?
A good question my boy, a good question indeed.
I have requested maps on exploration by the military leader, as I have lacked the time to analyze the situation myself. So far, I have not seen updated info on this. I dont know if the Head moron knows more though.
I ll try to look into it before turnchat
Deputy Moron
I have requested maps on exploration by the military leader, as I have lacked the time to analyze the situation myself. So far, I have not seen updated info on this. I dont know if the Head moron knows more though.
I ll try to look into it before turnchat
Deputy Moron
SaaM,
I reckon you have seen the discussion thread and poll I ve put up during these last few days. I think we have received enough opinions to pinpoint how to formulate an official poll. Please make one during these last days of your term in office, so the next leader will not have to worry about how his or her instructions should be.
D.M.
Edit: I will not be able to attend any turnchats this week. This is my moving week, as I am placing all my clubs and stone tablets in my new hut by Sunday. (new appartment) Unfortunately, this will also be in a remote location, so communication might be difficult for the nearest weeks. (no broadband till it will be installed)
I reckon you have seen the discussion thread and poll I ve put up during these last few days. I think we have received enough opinions to pinpoint how to formulate an official poll. Please make one during these last days of your term in office, so the next leader will not have to worry about how his or her instructions should be.
D.M.
Edit: I will not be able to attend any turnchats this week. This is my moving week, as I am placing all my clubs and stone tablets in my new hut by Sunday. (new appartment) Unfortunately, this will also be in a remote location, so communication might be difficult for the nearest weeks. (no broadband till it will be installed)
Similar threads
