Gall Communication Thread

But as we gave the Greeks engineering they owe us chivalry and us this will catch them at the end of their GA they wont be building hordes of knights with it. I they said we could use it with the dnuts as a form of bribery so really the case here shouldnt be very different.
 
BCLG100 said:
But as we gave the Greeks engineering they owe us chivalry and us this will catch them at the end of their GA they wont be building hordes of knights with it. I they said we could use it with the dnuts as a form of bribery so really the case here shouldnt be very different.
Click to expand...

They don't owe us chivalry for engineering. We sold engineering to them for gold.
 
Ok well there must be some way we can get it from them if thats what KISS are willing to sign a peace treaty for because its not really a lot.
 
KISS has played their turn and there is no battle log. That must mean they chose not to attack our stack. Is that a good sign or a bad sign? Did they run or retreat forward?
 
Hmm, im not sure they said they would actively pursue the war so we should still be wary. have we sent any units south yet?
 
tubby said:
Tubby Rower says:
1. Peace for 50 turns.
2. TNT cannot settle east of any of their present cities
3. TNT has to give KISS their next three techs that they research or receive on the upper tree
4. TNT is not allowed to research on the lower tree for the 50 turns.
Click to expand...

it was in AIM, i told him 4 was out immediatly.

1 and 3 were pretty good offers though. 2 also dealable if we manage to plant a few cities before the treaty is signed.
 
As far as I'm concerned, peace with the galls will come on equal terms.. or therer will be no peace.
 
but theyve beaten us in battle! why dont we just get peace rebuild and then attack them back in the future, 3 useless techs isnt that important.

50 turns of peace gives us a huge amount of security and if at the end of that 50 turns we can always spy on them and see what there upto.
 
BCLG100 said:
but theyve beaten us in battle! why dont we just get peace rebuild and then attack them back in the future, 3 useless techs isnt that important.

50 turns of peace gives us a huge amount of security and if at the end of that 50 turns we can always spy on them and see what there upto.
Click to expand...

Beaten us in battle? We've won far more fights than we've lost! They got lucky and managed to find three of our cities relatively close together and defenseless. That is the only thing that was wrong, we grew lax and to scared of our southern neighbor.

They haven't beaten us, not even close.
 
However if the war was the other way round i know which option id rather choose.

So what your saying is because we've had to abandon 3 cities and theyve lost a few units peace should be equal???
 
BCLG100 said:
However if the war was the other way round i know which option id rather choose.

So what your saying is because we've had to abandon 3 cities and theyve lost a few units peace should be equal???
Click to expand...

No, I said that we should accept nothing less than an equal peace treaty. I did not mention when or under what circumstances.
 
BCLG100 said:
why should we really? if we were in their posistion we wouldnt expect the same.
Click to expand...

Which is why I never said when we should make peace. What we have to do is put them into a poistion to take equal terms or better.
 
why? all thats happening is us falling further behind in points to everyone else, if we agreed to give them the 3 techs we could also agree trades with other teams for them techs.


you are talking about resettling our cities in other threads and dont seem to realise that this would be hindered by war, how long do you think it will take to get the amount of units to overcome their attack?
 
1 and 3 are acceptable, but not #2. we can't agree to not build on our eastern coast because then they will simply build lots of cities close together and secure a foothold on our continent. then we will have a huge thorn in our side for the rest of the game. we have to kill enough of their units, and destroy their soon newly founded city, to force them to take #2 out of a peace deal.
 
Yes i want peace on equal terms but why would they agree to that? We can push them to see how long they'd be able to last at war but even then were going to have to give them something in exchange for peace.
 
BCLG100 said:
Yes i want peace on equal terms but why would they agree to that? We can push them to see how long they'd be able to last at war but even then were going to have to give them something in exchange for peace.
Click to expand...

How's about we let them build their little city then we destroy it and the rest of the units they've landed. Once they see we will not allow them to have land over here they will agree to eaqual peace.
 
Well yes i agree we should get rid of them off our continent, however even then why should they agree to peace for nothing?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Cheezy the Wiz
Beer makes your body strong
2 3
Replies
54
Views
5K
pau17
P
Back
Top Bottom