Now then.
Should I go back, and re-read the game, will it make
any sense at all that you're masons?
Or will I find examples of bull-feces-ery.
Tell me, before I waste my time, NinjaCow. Am I going to find examples of you suspecting people that you shouldn't obviously suspect, because you've got no reason to suspect them?
Because your suspects for this round should look slightly like this:
Am I going to see incriminating or exonerating behavior from you?
You see, voting for me and accusing me doesn't make me believe you're masons. it makes me feel like you're full of BS, and we already have a BSmith. We don't need a BFactory.
There isn't a chance in... well, Hades, that you'd get me to believe you are both masons, you survived this deep into the game, and you both bafflingly believe the only guy who has claimed to have killed two different scumbags is also guilty.
Utterly baffling.
If you're masons, your play is collectively the worst I've ever seen from masons.
So am I wasting my time, re-reading the game to give you any benefit of the doubt whatsoever?
Because I was really, really looking forward to a night where I don't have to pore through this [bleep] and just take a nice relaxing night off.
Now you've got me double-checking this nonsense. It's pure nonsense. Has to be.
It's either desperate nonsense which means weve won, or it's desperate nonsense because we're desperate and not working well together.