Good (but cheap) video card for BF3?

Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
839
Location
USA
Can anyone recommend one for me for BF3? A cheap one? :cry::scan:

:confused::confused:

I have a Gateway with 6 gig of RAM. Pentium Dual Core Processor E5700, 3 GHZ. I got one of those crappy video cards that can run EVERY THING else but, not BF3.... :lol::mad:


Can anyone help me?
 
Sapphire 11202-00-20G Radeon HD 7750 1GB DDR5 HDMI / DVI-I / DP PCI-Express Graphics Card

Is that it? You think it will run with my machine?
 
Radeon HD 7750, $115.

$115? :eek:

I bought my Radeon HD 5770 for like $150 around a year and a half ago...

I'll never understand tech prices and their constant fluxes.
 
$115? :eek:

I bought my Radeon HD 5770 for like $150 around a year and a half ago...

I'll never understand tech prices and their constant fluxes.

It's not really much of a flux, it's just a march downwards.

However, the 5770 is a faster card than the 7750, it's more comparable now to the 7770 which runs around $130.
 
It's not really much of a flux, it's just a march downwards.

However, the 5770 is a faster card than the 7750, it's more comparable now to the 7770 which runs around $130.

Really?

I also will never understand video card naming conventions. You'd think they'd stick to a linear scale, better cards, higher numbers. But instead it's all over the place, or at least it seems that way.
 
Yeah, they deliberately obfuscate their names... The fact that the first digit (the "thousand") merely indicates the product generation/year in which it was made, whereas the 2nd from last digit (the "tens") actually indicates a pretty significant step up in performance is evidence of that.

Toms Hardware is the only place I look when I want to buy new gfx cards: Best Graphics Cards For The Money: September 2012

The Radeon HD 7750 is the fastest graphics card you can get right now that doesn't require an auxiliary power input
 
It's not really much of a flux, it's just a march downwards.

However, the 5770 is a faster card than the 7750, it's more comparable now to the 7770 which runs around $130.

I dunno, going by Futuremark's stats, while the 5770 is faster than the 7750 (by about 7%), it's a lot closer to that than the 7770 (which is 27% faster than the 5770). Maybe the non-synthetic benchmarks are different? I'd be kind of concerned if the 5770 were basically the same as the 7770, though - two generations ought to show an increase for what should be the same class of card (although I know AMD messed around with their naming around the 6000 era).

The prices can also be kind of strange. Generally, it is a march downwards, but the 6870 is still selling for the exact same price or slightly higher than when I bought it 9 months ago, despite the 7000 series having been out a long time.
 
I don't consider synthetic benchmarks to be of any value.

Tom's Hardware puts their composite scores as follows:
2011 Tests:
5770: 49.17
6870: 76.70

2012 Tests: (not directly comparable to 2011)
7750: 58.32
7770: 67.56
6870: 82.49

re: Your 6870 - cards typically don't drop much from what AMD/Nvidia set as the MSRP - much of the time AMD/Nvidia don't drop the price much on higher end cards since there isn't much stock, they just discontinue them.
 
Back
Top Bottom