CorvusFortis
Prince
Spoiler :
The only reference to 17 in BLDGs section is Hydro Plant city icon, and I see no problems. And I am pretty sure, I haven't encountered this error couple months earlier. Does anyone know what's wrong in this case?
Have no idea, what the game wants from me
- Thread starter CorvusFortis
- Start date
The only reference to 17 in BLDGs section is Hydro Plant city icon, and I see no problems. And I am pretty sure, I haven't encountered this error couple months earlier. Does anyone know what's wrong in this case?
Virote_Considon
The Great Dictator
It could be that a building has just 17 as it's pedia entry instead of BLDG_Whatever.
The Hydro Plant entry in pediaicons could be formatted incorrectly.
A building's small pediaicon could be pointing to \art\civilopedia\icons\17 (note no .pcx).
My guess would be the second one.
The Hydro Plant entry in pediaicons could be formatted incorrectly.
A building's small pediaicon could be pointing to \art\civilopedia\icons\17 (note no .pcx).
My guess would be the second one.
CorvusFortis
Prince
That was my first thought too, but didn't seem to be the case. Here's the entry:
#ICON_BLDG_Hydro_Plant
SINGLE
17
art\civilopedia\icons\buildings\hydroplantlarge.pcx
art\civilopedia\icons\buildings\hydroplantsmall.pcx
Why would the game consider 17 to be entry start? It is literallly cut and paste from original pediaicons file.
#ICON_BLDG_Hydro_Plant
SINGLE
17
art\civilopedia\icons\buildings\hydroplantlarge.pcx
art\civilopedia\icons\buildings\hydroplantsmall.pcx
Why would the game consider 17 to be entry start? It is literallly cut and paste from original pediaicons file.
WildWeazel
Carthago Creanda Est
The previous entry is probably misconfigured with the wrong number of lines (eg ERA with only 2 images), causing the game to read ahead into the next entry looking for the rest.
CorvusFortis
Prince
Yep, that was the case, thank you very much!
Similar threads
