Historical Book Recomendation Thread

800 pages is a long read?
 
I thought it was longer, but 800 pages of dense reading isn't exactly 'short'.
 
I thought it was light. This was a heavy slog.
 
Chris Tyerman's God's War: A New History of the Crusades is a good read.

Seconded. Runciman is also great, but less up-to-date.
 
800 pages is a long read?

From a strict page-count perspective, it's probably above-average unless you count multi-volume tomes as one book. My definition of a long book is anything greater than 600 pages. However, if it is well-written and holds the my interest, I can easily read over a hundred in a sitting.

Besides The Crimean War, I'm soliciting suggestions for favorites of European and American history to read. I am coming down the finish line in Iron Kingdom, have another couple on deck, but then I gotta find some more.
 
This is not so much of a book recommendation as a request for information.

Are John Toland's (the author, not the philosopher) books, for lack of a better word, "good" and historically accurate? I'm currently reading his biography of Adolf Hitler, and would like to know if there are any "wrong" assertions or big mistakes.

Any controversy Toland has as a historian comes from his works on Japan and WWII. He wrote a history of Japan in WWII in the 1970s, the first major Western historian to do so from the Japanese perspective, and it got a lot of praise. But some argue he swallowed up the Japanese revisionism and rationalizations a little too much. I haven't read it in several years so I can't really say how true that critique is.

Later in his career, Toland also swallowed the FDR/Pearl Harbor conspiracies hook, line and sinker. So that's a strike against him.

I don't know anything about his Hitler biography though.
 
Again asking about authors, rather than a real recommendation.

Would you recommend Richard J. Evans' books, particularly his trilogy on the Third Reich? In addition, what are your thoughts on the book Paris 1919 by Margaret Macmillan & Richard Holbrooke?
 
In addition, what are your thoughts on the book Paris 1919 by Margaret Macmillan & Richard Holbrooke?
Kinda pro-Entente. Bog-standard, except from a literary standpoint (literarily it's pretty good). Doesn't break any ground.
 
If I were to read a book about any time in history, on any subject, which book would you guys reccomend?
 
What're you looking for: entertainment, edification, an appropriate mix of both, or what?
 
Both. I'd like something that isn't 'pop-history' but is still enjoyable and a good piece of literature. (Something similar to Norwich's Byzantium series but with a bit more analysis that is in line with modern scholarship (a criticism I remember you have of Norwich).)
 
Oh, okay. The Transformation of European Politics 1763-1848 by Paul Schroeder.
 
Let me guess, the key points of the book are the Council of Vienna and Metternich?
I liked that period in AP Euro, I'll have to check it out later.
 
The book is organized around the reign of Napoleon, actually. The Vienna settlement itself doesn't receive disproportionate time, and Metternich as a statesman comes up just about as much as Castlereagh.
 
Reading it now, something that confused me was how Schroeder seems to be opposed to to the concept of a "balance of power" but apparently European diplomats very much acted with it in mind. Doesn't that make it real?
 
Reading it now, something that confused me was how Schroeder seems to be opposed to to the concept of a "balance of power" but apparently European diplomats very much acted with it in mind. Doesn't that make it real?
I daresay 99% of the world population (or more) is opposed to the concept of a "thousand-year Reich" but apparently Nazi politicians and soldiers very much acted with it in mind. Does that make it real?

Schroeder does not deny that people acted as though the concept of a balance of power existed. Indeed, that is the centerpiece of his thesis on the transformation of European politics - the balance of power was taken to its apotheosis in Napoleon, the rest of Europe's statesmen recoiled in horror, and they developed a new system that worked much better. Because the fact of the matter is that the idea of the "balance of power", although it obviously does exist, does not work: its result is pure entropy. It creates conflicts where they need not exist and uses one conflict against another - and the result can hardly be anything but greater conflict and greater enmity.
 
I'm trying to make my daughters grow up just like me so I'm trying to make them develop an interest in history. I've started reading Gombrich's A Little History of the World to my 8 year old and I think we are both enjoying quite a bit. Any other suggestions on history books for 8-10 year olds would be much appreciated.
 
I'm trying to make my daughters grow up just like me so I'm trying to make them develop an interest in history. I've started reading Gombrich's A Little History of the World to my 8 year old and I think we are both enjoying quite a bit. Any other suggestions on history books for 8-10 year olds would be much appreciated.

Uh... that's a little tough. As a general theme, though, I would stick with more narrative-style histories. When she gets a little older (or now if she is mature for her age), I recommend literally anything by David McCullough--the words just flow off the page, especially if you are there to help clarify when he uses language she might not understand. You might want to start with his shorter books like Mornings on Horseback (about Teddy Roosevelt), The Johnstown Flood (about a broken dam in Pennsylvania), 1776 (about the first year of the American Revolution, mostly focused on George Washington) or Path Between the Seas (about the Panama Canal) before jumping into something like John Adams or Truman.

I read a few good ones in high school that might work if she reads at an advanced level and you are reading together: you might want to try something like Isaac's Storm (about the hurricane that hit Galveston around 1900) or The Right Stuff (about the US space program and the astronauts)--both are fast-paced, with dialogue, etc. but are accurate on their history. If you don't mind skipping over the parts about the oldest profession, Ancient Rome on Five Denarii a Day is a fun read--it's written like a travel guidebook, but for Rome at the height of its power. So it has basic Latin phrases to help you buy bread and ask around, life in the day of a commoner type text. Finally, depending on if her interests trend towards the martial, Osprey books are short, focused, and often have plenty of illustrations.
 
I'm trying to make my daughters grow up just like me

Maybe you should read some books on childhood education too?
 
Maybe you should read some books on childhood education too?

My response to this would be wayyy funnier if I could find the Always Sunny clip where Mac and Charlie talk about jamming their opinions down kids' throats on Youtube...
 
Back
Top Bottom