you mean Alexander used the same tactic to take the Sogdanian fortress as Xenophon used on his march when Armenian were threating him from their strong hold !?!?! go figure
Alexander's capture of the Rock of Sogdiana is verifiable -- at least as verifiable as something that happened 2300 years ago is... Several sources describe it.
Originally posted by Xen all in all, I would more then likelly preven t the Roman empire from EVER becoming christian- christianity has every right to exists as its own religion, but it shoudl have NEVER been a national religion, espcially for the Roman empire
this just came to my attention. actually, it has been argued, and if i recall correctly even on History Channel special "First 1000 Years of Christianity", thatthe establishment of Christianity as Rome's official state religion actually extended the life of the Roman Empire by a century or so as it was already beginning its decline at the time of the introduction of Christianity as the official religion, and this action brought back a degree of unity among the Romans that worked as kind of a life-support machine until the fall of Rome.
I cannot really make a guess that involves entire countries and what not, because we have no way of knowing what ramifications changes at that level would make. However, were I to hazard one, I'd find some way of preventing Lincoln's death. I think he would've made reconstruction more tolerable for the south.
On a slightly smaller level, I'd see that Sherman got dysentary or something before he went off on his "glorious" raid. The Hindenburg disaster is another thing..
Originally posted by Kamilian1
this just came to my attention. actually, it has been argued, and if i recall correctly even on History Channel special "First 1000 Years of Christianity", thatthe establishment of Christianity as Rome's official state religion actually extended the life of the Roman Empire by a century or so as it was already beginning its decline at the time of the introduction of Christianity as the official religion, and this action brought back a degree of unity among the Romans that worked as kind of a life-support machine until the fall of Rome.
hardly, the reason they say it "unified" is because assorten EMperors worked hard makeing every religion other then Chrsitianity illegle- no I assure you, chrsistianity was, and remains amound the worst religions to found a government around- remember what an empire is- an amaglimation of differnt cultures into one state- nationalizing was somthing that couldnt be done by religious means, not then, and nor even now
even if it is not really realistic, i would succeed the german revolution in 1848 and make germany a parliamentary monarchy. probably there would be no ww1 and ww2...
Lead the Hebrew people to conquer the entire region they were given by GOD, not just Palestine. That means te entire arabian penisula, up to the caucus mountains and even into persia and babylon.
I'd lead the Egyptian people to kick the Hebrew peoples' butts and conquer the entire region they were given by their GODS, not just Egypt. That means the entire Arabian peninsula, up to the Caucasus Mountains and even into Persia and Babylon
I would stop the decline and fall of the roman empire. The fall of the roman empire set European civilisation back several hundred years (Actually more, the middle ages are called the middle ages because they came between the fall of the roman empire and the rebirth of "proper" european powers. The middle ages lasted roughly 1000, according to which history book you read). Stopping the decline would be important.
I am Catholic as well. However, many historians believe that Constantine's conversion and ensuing contribution to the Church made the Church a powerful and wealthy landowner -- which led to the money grabbing (i.e., pardoners, the Fourth Crusade, etc.) and the general corrupt nature of the Church through the Middle Ages -- something that the original founders of the Church never intended. Kings throughout Europe tried to install "their" man as the pope -- refer to the great Schism -- so they could control the wealth of the Church. I believe that the Church has since recovered, and is back "on mission." However, the conversion of Rome sent the Church into spiralling darkness for several centuries.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.