How do you rate Civ 5?

2/5

The game just feels like it was released 6months/a year too early.

Don't get me wrong I wouldn't have rated Civ4 above 3/5 at launch either and Civ5 may have the POTENTIAL to be a good game, but I'm not paying for potential, I'm paying for fun which, for me anyways is really lacking atm.
 
5/5. I'm loving it. Does need some polish and AI work. Love the hexes, 1upt, social policies, city-states. Miss religion and health a bit, but I don't want to go back to squares and stacks of doom.
 
4 out of 5....AI is terrible. City-States are kinda dull. Diplomacy is lacking.

But, future patches and mods will make this game way more incredible and unique than BTS: CIV IV. It's only going to get better, people.
 
I'd give it a C. 3/5.

It's an average game made by what I consider a top notch developer. I'd give it a higher score if it was released by a small / indie developer, but I expected a more polished product from Firaxis.
 
2/5, may climb to 4/5 with mods and decent patching. Anyway last civ game I buy, I don't like the turn the series is taking.
 
3/5 - this game isn't finished yet, but can be played to a degree of enjoyment.

I came within a handful of turns of beating it on Immortal. My third game. THAT is how too easy the game is.
 
4.5/5 for me.

I think people are judging the game too harshly out of its first impression(steam, Rev-like UI, apparent lack of features that were in civ 4)

After playing the game for 50hrs+ already since worldwide release and still loving it I can definitely say civ 5 is the civ for me.
 
3.
If they do their homework regarding bugs: 4, or even 5. I see potential. They just have to bugfix it into the game.
 
Back
Top Bottom