• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days. For more updates please see here.

I was definitely going to support Civ 6 but I am super offended

Status
Not open for further replies.
Get over yourself. If you don't like it don't buy the game and make your own its really that simple
 
This post should have a trigger warning for sensitive types like me. I'm offended by all of the offence taking.
 
While we're at it, someone explain to me why they continue to make the Kurd Saladin, whose dynasty was centered in Egypt, the ruler of Arabia?
 
No it shouldn't be moved. It's ok to make criticisms of a game on the forums, I don't agree with people who want a whitewashed set of opinions here.

I'd also like to add that it's ridiculous that Persia wasn't included. Some people countered by saying Scythia was added, to me that's completely unrelated - I wonder what people would think if England was not included because they wanted to add the Celts.
 
And a German ruler of the British empire the leader of England
And an Italian whose biggest achievement was a religious massacre the leader of France
And they showed Cleopatra the Greek as too dark-blackwashing
Same with Pedro (he was blond)-blackwashing
 
No it shouldn't be moved. It's ok to make criticisms of a game on the forums, I don't agree with people who want a whitewashed set of opinions here.

I'd also like to add that it's ridiculous that Persia wasn't included. Some people countered by saying Scythia was added, to me that's completely unrelated - I wonder what people would think if England was not included because they wanted to add the Celts.

Civilizations that were added in civ5 expansions and dlc tended to be more powerful. So when we do get persia they will probably be badass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom