Imperium Offtopicum - UN Building

I propose Byzantine South Africa be turned into a UN trust territory until a more suitable solution(i.e. another player) can be found.

At Carthage:

You truly are a master of subtlety, my ally. ;)

oh. oh. now i get it. sorry Carthage i don't want to turn it over to you, your too large as is.
 
Your sense of humor astounds and impresses me beyond anything I have ever witnessed before this moment and likely for many years afterward.
 
Oh crap there's more of them.

Abstain for IX, X, XI, and XIV

No for XII (they're kind of small right now, but Brazil is like a third of SA...)

For XI, XIII, XVII, and XIX.
 
No to Tibet and Marian.

No to Israel, we think that Saudi, Yemen, and the third country form an Islamic Republic, to make sure that Israel doesn't dominate the entire Middle East, and its valuable oil.
 
Byzantium passes an act with a 85.7% favor with the population.

the Twilight Saga is forever BANNED from Byzantium!

further measures may be taken as time passes.
 
Only 85.7%?

But... I thought there weren't any fangirls on this site. Oh crap, we are so screwed...
 
No to Tibet and Marian.

No to Israel, we think that Saudi, Yemen, and the third country form an Islamic Republic, to make sure that Israel doesn't dominate the entire Middle East, and its valuable oil.

The middle east isn't the only place in the world that has oil ya know. If you want oil that isn't Israeli you can always head out to Venezuela, Angola, Indonesia, America, Canada, Alaska, etc.

So really, the oil argument doesn't work here. Plus, besides the oil (which was a minor topic when considering these provinces to annex), I need more land as to secure my position from potential enemies. I am surrounded by massive empires, who claim massive amounts of land when they can. All I want is two countries, it's almost nothing compared to some of the more outrageous claims lately.

EDIT: I don't know if I already voted for this or not, but a big giant NO to Tibet's claims. All of China? Really?
 
Only 85.7%?

But... I thought there weren't any fangirls on this site. Oh crap, we are so screwed...

i honestly considered 100% but i wanted to be realistic.

hmm. crap. i think i did a momentually evil thing right there.
 
Still waiting for a response to why me claiming a bunch of tiny islands, Iceland, Qatar, and some stuff that directly borders my home country is bad when someone who will get to control about a third of Africa in all is good.
 
Anyone else notice that the US just invaded Panama? Anyone going to do anything about it?

@US: Pacifistan absolutely does not condone such actions against a neutral free-trade zone. If you do not pull out, sanctions will follow.
 
Just dig a canal from the Mississippi to the Colorado River and widen the Grand Canyon :p
 
I think three days has gone by now.

Restate your new claims(just in case you've changed them), and I'll happily make them a case. :)

Anyone else notice that the US just invaded Panama? Anyone going to do anything about it?

@US: Pacifistan absolutely does not condone such actions against a neutral free-trade zone. If you do not pull out, sanctions will follow.

I will quote this just for the sake of clarity and alerting the international community. I believe this issue with unite all the ideologies and alliances of the world - socialist, capitalist, ODP, etc. - in a universal condemnation of the United States' aggression.

I repeat: The United States has INVADED Panama!

Furthermore, who shall roll for the defender in battles against the United Nations' territory? Should we elect a player, or should the Secretary General for Life(currently the Marian Emperor; fear not, as the position itself has no power other than administrative duties), for the sake of speed and effective responses, roll for the UN?
 
With the permission of the UN and in light of the results of California v. Byzantium, I would like to amend the rules to clarify that not just nuclear weaponry, but ALL weaponry with clear potential for mass destruction and extermination(chemical weapons, bio weapons, antimatter weapons, etc.) should be banned.
 
With the permission of the UN and in light of the results of California v. Byzantium, I would like to amend the rules to clarify that not just nuclear weaponry, but ALL weaponry with clear potential for mass destruction and extermination(chemical weapons, bio weapons, antimatter weapons, etc.) should be banned.

good. but the gram of antimatter that i have (and im slowly producing more) is kept. obviously there's a good amount of power potential here.
 
Back
Top Bottom