Ok, so many people that illegally download things off the internet do not have a legitimate excuse; they are simply cheap, lazy thieves. However, my defense is that I am actually spending more money on music by illegally downloading songs, because I use they system to see if I actually like an artist or not.
Before, I would not risk buying too many cds unless I had heard at least a few of their songs on the radio, but I don't listen to Pop, rock, or anything anymore that is played on the radio. So actually, the music industry is making more money off of me when I illegally download music than if I was not doing it.
So if this law prohibiting illegally downloaded music is actually not effective in individual cases in its purpose, then can the law bend to pardon people like me? Would I have to show proof that it is not effective in my case?
Before, I would not risk buying too many cds unless I had heard at least a few of their songs on the radio, but I don't listen to Pop, rock, or anything anymore that is played on the radio. So actually, the music industry is making more money off of me when I illegally download music than if I was not doing it.
So if this law prohibiting illegally downloaded music is actually not effective in individual cases in its purpose, then can the law bend to pardon people like me? Would I have to show proof that it is not effective in my case?