To be fair, tearing down statues is also a monumental disaster ATM.
Is a civ with no monuments and transgender generals on the cards also?
If history is not for learning lessons and showing a growth of maturity in humanity then have we grown at all?
Removing statues is sometimes less of a matter of censoring/erasing history and more about changing what we celebrate. If we're talking about people destroying a statue on public property, that's a problem no matter whether you support the statues themselves or not because that's a legal issue. But, if you're referring to Confederate statues in the United States being torn down: is it not actually showing growth of humanity? Many people want to remove the statues as part of a process of growth & maturity of humanity, because humanity is trying to
move on from the ideals celebrated by Confederate statues. The statues honour and glorify racist and undemocratic ideals and individuals, and taking them down represents a shift away from those ideals, because humanity has (hopefully) learned the lesson and is showing growth of maturity. I don't think anyone is trying to say that the individuals, ideas, etc. represented by the statues should be censored or forgotten; the people who want the statues gone can be the most vocal in teaching about the part of history they represent, because they are trying to either A: teach about why it was wrong, or B: simply teach about it in general, and let people determine for themselves how they feel about it (though this could lead to it being glorified by people today, as in the white supremacy prevalent in American society, which brings up another issue about the Confederate statues and whether they glorify and support modern white supremacy)
Do you think we should still glorify those Confederate leaders with statues honouring them? Or do you just want them to
not be erased from the history books? I think the majority of people who disagree with the former will agree with the latter.
I also don't understand the comment about 'transgender generals' and wonder if it's meant to be some jab against the movement of supporting trans rights, i.e. not at all welcome or relevant.