I hope not - because this way there is still a chance they won't reveal Venice this time and I couldn't stand two more weeks explaining all Venice theories to people.
...and I'll get tired explaining to people that 'theories' is the wrong word.
I hope not - because this way there is still a chance they won't reveal Venice this time and I couldn't stand two more weeks explaining all Venice theories to people.
...and I'll get tired explaining to people that 'theories' is the wrong word.
I am not sure it is a wrong word - just as theory of evolution or theory of gravity, they are collections of facts and reasoning justifying a certain thesis. And like those two theories, they are pretty much as good as true.
@Menzies: There is a colloquial meaning and this isn't a scientific study, does it truly matter in this context? Does it matter when we're in a forum that suggests Giant Spiders (jokingly) as an Australian UU?
So no, they are not full well tested explanations that are predictive, they are instead as described as above. I would call them, if anything, 'the Law of City State Colour-Type Replacement' and the 'Wikivenetian Colour Conjecture', but calling them "theories" doesn't even make sense in this context. In a very casual entirely non-scientific sense theory can be used to mean just about anything, but in the same way literally can mean both "literally" and "not literally" and to be blunt, if we're going to get into that kind of discussion we may as well call it '\/3n1c3 SWAGYOLO #EUROCENTRISM #LiterallyTheory'.
In the colloquial sense, it honestly just means a set of thoughts/ideas. We're not scientists, yet some modicum of standardization should be observed, ensuring that everyone comprehends the message. (so that negates the use of "\/3n1c3 SWAGYOLO #EUROCENTRISM #LiterallyTheory"), but everyone else understands the SENSE that "theory" gives off, and as long as that is understood, it's fine. So we use the colloquial sense; a set of thoughts.From the previous post.
In the colloquial sense, it honestly just means a set of thoughts/ideas. We're not scientists, yet some modicum of standardization should be observed, ensuring that everyone comprehends the message. (so that negates the use of "\/3n1c3 SWAGYOLO #EUROCENTRISM #LiterallyTheory"), but everyone else understands the SENSE that "theory" gives off, and as long as that is understood, it's fine. So we use the colloquial sense; a set of thoughts.
If "\/3n1c3 SWAGYOLO #EUROCENTRISM #LiterallyTheory" were easily understood and comprehensible, then that'd be fine.
Bugger it, I give in, '\/3n1c3 SWAGYOLO #EUROCENTRISM #LiterallyTheory' it is.
We could just call it '\/enice #SWAGYOLOTheory' for short?
Problem is, it's neither easily understandable nor widely used. "The Most Serene Venetian Theory of The Most Serene Venetian Republic of the Most Serene Venetian Venice™" would probably be more readily understandable IMHO, at least that has some precedent on these forums*.
*in no way am I promoting the use of this phrase for use be the general public
You should trademark Wikivenetian.
"The Most Serene Wikivenetian Theory of The Most Serene Venetian Republic of the Most Serene Venetian Venice SWAGYOLO@MOSTSERENEREPUBLIC #LiterallyMostSereneVenetianTheory"
So what are this week's prospects?
In a very casual entirely non-scientific sense theory can be used to mean just about anything, but in the same way literally can mean both "literally" and "not literally" and to be blunt, if we're going to get into that kind of discussion we may as well call it '\/3n1c3 SWAGYOLO #EUROCENTRISM #LiterallyTheory'.
I still say nothing this week and the final double reveal on June 14th.
My wishlist for info this week is stuff that sweeps the scattered dust under the rug once and for all:
-Clarify France (confirm UU, elaborate on Chateau)
-Clarify Indonesia (confirm continents rules, elaborate on unique luxury resources, reveal how many different kris swordsman upgrades there are total or if it's just three)