Possibly there should be a "regular army" and the levies raised for a small amount of time, later changing into conscripts. The amount of decentralization should probably affect the amount of levies, and differently in different times (before the fall of feudalism, its easier for the more decentralized, after it, its generally not easy to get them for either, after the conscription/mobilization becomes widespread, easier for the more centralized). If they are kept in the army for too long a time, this will cause discontence both amongst them and amongst either the feudals, either the people.
Jason The King said:yes, but incredibly hard to mod.
Just have a maximum each nation can recruit, and have it be unique to each nation. Rome can only recruit 10,000 men a turn, which Russia can raise 50,000. This grows as time goes on and populations grow.
well thats because...... Prussias army were conscripts and everyone else were farmers w/ guns
yes, but incredibly hard to mod.
Jason The King said:yes, but incredibly hard to mod.
Just have a maximum each nation can recruit, and have it be unique to each nation. Rome can only recruit 10,000 men a turn, which Russia can raise 50,000. This grows as time goes on and populations grow.
Btw, as for Prussian forces - I believe that their forces, just like the Napoleonic ones, had worse training then the PROFFESIONAL armies (well, they had both, but conscripts were the base of their force). Ultimately, however, it proved (during the Franco-Prussian War) that the officer corps is much more important then the lower-ranked troop mass. The French proffesional army got beaten up by Prussian conscripts led by better officers.
The French relied a lot on conscripts, too. There was a lot of national enthusiasm to see the man who doctored the Ems Telegram (Bismarck) get his. That, and old hatred toward Blucher's nation. The French even had an early machine gun (the mitrailleuse), but because of incredibly schlecht logistics, they only got about fifty or so to the front to hit the Germans. Prussia had the breech-loading rifle, though, so being able to take cover would have helped.das said:That's the problem with it all, indeed.
Btw, as for Prussian forces - I believe that their forces, just like the Napoleonic ones, had worse training then the PROFFESIONAL armies (well, they had both, but conscripts were the base of their force). Ultimately, however, it proved (during the Franco-Prussian War) that the officer corps is much more important then the lower-ranked troop mass. The French proffesional army got beaten up by Prussian conscripts led by better officers.
Are you sure, Prussian - and eventually German - infantry training was IMHO the best in Europe for their time. Except by 1870 their dreyse rifles were outdated to the french chassepot.