IOT Developmental Thread

[GhostWriter16]

I, for one, would like to not have a whole world map, or even as much as a hemisphere. What if we do a Europe one, an Asia one, India, Japan, China, Russia, Mesoamerica, all great possibilities.

First of all, it depends on the era, depending on what the GMs (You are one of them, can you tell us what's going on in GM land?) decide, Industrial or Classical. I see no reason to not do the whole world if we do industrial.

If we do Classical, I'd either like to see what Taillesskangaru suggested or just Europe, Middle East, and North Africa.

 

[civplayah]

(You are one of them, can you tell us what's going on in GM land?)

We've redone the tech/economy system, we're thinking about a stability mechanic, looks like we're going to go with industrial, we're probably going to implement some kind of trading mechanism, and we're adding 'national bonuses', small little bonuses that are unique to your nation.

 

[GhostWriter16]

We've redone the tech/economy system, we're thinking about a stability mechanic, looks like we're going to go with industrial, we're probably going to implement some kind of trading mechanism, and we're adding 'national bonuses', small little bonuses that are unique to your nation.

This all sounds good to me. When are we starting?

PS: I will support a stability system as well.

 

[civplayah]

This all sounds good to me. When are we starting?

As soon as we finalize all this- we're still debating a little.

 

[GhostWriter16]

As soon as we finalize all this- we're still debating a little.

Almost done then?

EDIT: What kind of stability system is being discussed?

 

[Arakhor]

Industrial? The one that everyone passed up in favour of Modern or Mediaeval and then got doubly passed up when people rushed for Renaissance as a compromise?

 

[Lord of Elves]

Industrial? The one that everyone passed up in favour of Modern or Mediaeval and then got doubly passed up when people rushed for Renaissance as a compromise?

The logic escapes me as well, Arakhor.

 

[Mad Man]

I think a game with different maps for different regions would be interesting, it would allow more room for potential players and keep the game going longer with more territories to claim.

 

[civplayah]

EDIT: What kind of stability system is being discussed?

We haven't gotten very far into it, just brainstorming ideas.

 

[NedimNapoleon]

I think a game with different maps for different regions would be interesting, it would allow more room for potential players and keep the game going longer with more territories to claim.

I agree

 

[GhostWriter16]

I think a game with different maps for different regions would be interesting, it would allow more room for potential players and keep the game going longer with more territories to claim.

I would oppose it because then its basically two games being packaged as one game. Taillesskangaru's idea didn't seem too bad though.

We haven't gotten very far into it, just brainstorming ideas.

Were mine discussed?

 

[civplayah]

Were mine discussed?

To which of your ideas do you refer?

 

[GhostWriter16]

I don't remember which thread it was in, maybe it was deleted because it was off topic. Ah well.

 

[Tee Kay]

Because I figured you guys would find out eventually when we relaunch anyway, we're going with the Industrial Age.

 

[GhostWriter16]

Because I figured you guys would find out eventually when we relaunch anyway, we're going with the Industrial Age.

I fully support this move.

 

[NedimNapoleon]

So when is it going to relaunch (today,tomorrow, in a week...)

 

[W|M]

I thought we were going Classical! Only Domination, you and ilduce (I think) want no classical!

 

[Cull]

Then its a good thing I wasn't going to play anyways.

 

[GhostWriter16]

Then its a good thing I wasn't going to play anyways.

You aren't?

Also, GMs are talking behind our backs, for all we know they all support industrial or classical would be too tough to do or require too much complexity.

 

[W|M]

But (by far) the majority wants Classical!