That's fair. But, by what alternative criteria does the Labour Party appear to be institutionally anti-Semitic?
Several Greek regimes through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries carried out aggressive campaigns of territorial expansion and ethnic cleansing, and many modern Greeks are descendants of the survivors of similar policies in neighboring countries. Like most of the former Hapsburg-Romanov-Ottoman world, its current appearance of ethnic homogeneity is the outcome of a genocidal century. We are not uncritical of the Hellenic Republic because we regard Greeks as entitled to their blood and soil in a way that Jews are not, but because that dust has settled and there's very little left to do but mourn.
The Israel-Palestine conflict is a mistake that the human race is still trying not to make. Analogies to mistakes which are now irreversible is not going to draw sympathy for your cause.
Jews have been there continually since antiquity. And how exactly would you "reverse" this "settlement" without some new Holocaust?Hang on, a territorial settlement that is, at most, seventy years past, is irreversible?
It says a lot about an argument when you need to revert to a strawman to defend it.Jews have been there continually since antiquity. And how exactly would you "reverse" this "settlement" without some new Holocaust?
Can Europe "reverse" its non-European immigrant origin population? They are more recent than Israel...
To clarify, then, you don't believe that the Labour is institutionally anti-Semitic?My purpose on this thread isn't to prove your Labor party antisemitic, it's to respond to the OP's nonsense.
"International Social-Democracy stands for the recognition of the right of nations to self-determination." - V.I. LeninNo, I do believe there's something called self-determination that most non-Marxists accept as valid, to varying degrees. .
Wait, why am I being singled out? I don't even vote for Corbyn's party.In this worldview, it's up to people like Traitorfish and the OP, self described anti-racists that they are, to explain to Jews what is anti-Semitism and why Corbyn does not fit the bill.
No, but you feel like you can teach the virtual totality of British Jews what anti-semitism really is like.Wait, why am I being singled out? I don't even vote for Corbyn's party.![]()
Mouthwash isn't British, and my comment was an elaboration on a point made by Ajidica.No, but you feel like you can teach the virtual totality of British Jews what anti-semitism really is like.
I mean the general vibe of "Corbyn is not and has never done anything which can be called antisemitic and he has not allowed antisemitism to thrive in anyway in his party". Despite, you know, the near unanimous opinion of British Jews. But why should we listen to them on the topic of anti-semitism? Self-proclaimed anti-racist crusaders surely know best, right?Mouthwash isn't British, and my comment was an elaboration on a point made by Ajidica.
What opinion?I mean the general vibe of "Corbyn is not and has never done anything which can be called antisemitic and he has not allowed antisemitism to thrive in anyway in his party". Despite, you know, the near unanimous opinion of British Jews. But why should we listen to them on the topic of anti-semitism? Self-proclaimed anti-racist crusaders surely know best, right?
To be honest, no. I would expect the Jews to be far more insulted about his friendship with Hamas, for example, than his use of Zionist as a dog whistle and insinuations that Jews aren't really English. But I don't try to teach them what should insult them or not.A vibe you are peculiarly sensitive to.
Eh, that change is between 2016 and 17. In 2016 Corbyn was already the Dear Leader of the party. The number skyrocketed under Corbyn, so after September 2015, to the point where British Jews are now more than 4 time as likely to see an antisemitism problem in Labour than the Conservative Party, which is freaking enormous.What opinion?
The closest I've seen to "near-unanimity" was a YouGov poll which found that 83% of British Jews thought that Labour was "too tolerant of anti-Semitism". Nothing there to indicate that they thought that Labour was institutionally anti-Semitic, or that Corbyn personally is an anti-Semite. In fact, the figure fell from 87% to 83% under Corbyn's leadership- probably within a margin of error, but this would be a funny point in the conservation to become rigid about statistical interpretation. The same survey also found that about a third of Jews had similar feelings about the Greens, SNP and Liberal Democrats, but that has been no comparable scandals surrounding those parties.
The linked article also points that the survey itself is a little unreliable, as the sampling was based on the National Jewish Community Survey, which is self-selecting and therefore weighted towards conservative and religious Jews, so all of the above figures have to be taken with a pinch of salt.
So not a lot British Jews think Corbyn is an anti-semite, eh?"Jews think Corbyn was cloned from Hitler's lost testicle."
"Not all Jews think that."
"Oh, so now you know better than Jews?"
I don't have survey figures to show that. You don't have survey figures to show that. Neither of us do. That's the point. You're making accusations based on speculation and inference, and demanding that they be taken as self-evidently true until proven otherwise. It's a profoundly dishonest line of argument.So not a lot British Jews think Corbyn is an anti-semite, eh?
To clarify, then, you don't believe that the Labour is institutionally anti-Semitic?
"Jews think Corbyn was cloned from Hitler's lost testicle."
"Not all Jews think that."
"Oh, so now you know better than Jews?"
I do have data to show that after Corbyn took over (which happened in 2015), over 80% of British Jews think there is an antisemitism problem is his party, a proportion which is more than 4 times higher the equivalent figure for the Conservative Party. The party which was historically the natural home of anti-semites.I don't have survey figures to show that. You don't have survey figures to show that. Neither of us do. That's the point. You're making accusations based on speculation and inference, and demanding that they be taken as self-evidently true until proven otherwise. It's a profoundly dishonest line of argument.