ITNESI History Thread

das

Regeneration In Process
Joined
Apr 8, 2001
Messages
19,309
Location
Ekaterinburg (Sverdlovsk), Russia
As times, boring and interesting, go, stuff happens. So much stuff that it might not be east to catch up. So I decided to start a history thread where BT and Summary IT updates will be posted. Also, other players and lurkers can feel free to post ITNES history articles or discuss althistorical scenarios, if they so please.

DON'T POST YET!
 

Civilized Zones map BT I

EDIT: Why is it in a link?
 
BT I - Years 2000-700 BC

Civilizations rose throughout the world, evolving into kingdoms. Far from all of them made it to 700 BC - the stronger neighbhors, whether civilized or barbaric, often destroyed the smaller, weaker kingdoms. Thus, into 700 BC, only these strong enough to do so survived. After a few centuries of comparative peace - i.e. the barbarian raids became less spread out and the riverine civilizations were thriving from agriculture and, well, occasional plundering - the world has now entered a new era of warfare.

For large parts of the civilized world, 700 BC was the time when the iron age already begun, when the first great military fleets were built and when barbarian raids intensified again. Generally, the world is still largely unsettled and even uncharted by civilized people; but there are certain acknowledged centers of civilization in the world, and in much of those, war is coming for the dominance over the fertile lands and/or prosperous trade routes.

Americas:

Isolated and backwards, these two continents DO contain some primitive civilizations, the most developped of which is the Olmec one. Ofcourse, it is far from the level of the greater civilizaitons of the Eastern Hemisphere, but nonetheless, it developped a jaguarocentric religious system, complete with a pantheon of gods, a calendar, a system of kingship (eventually unifying around the city-state of Laventa [1] after its king defeated the Sanlorenzians [1], heretofore the strongest Olmec city) and long-distance trade. One might note, meanwhile, that the barbarians with whom they trade across Mesoamerica are increasingly infringing on Olmec copyrights and otherwise coming under Olmec cultural influence; also, an Olmec-style civilization is BEGINNING to develop amongst one of those tribes, the Zapotecs...

But for now, Olmecs are the only true civilization in their region. They are also notable, by the way, for their sculpture.

Europe:

Europe was not, for the most part, a home to the early civilizations, but by 700 BC, due to the rise of Mediterranean trade and the foundation of several colonies, the continent's southern coast became a home to a few states, mostly of "native" origin. Much of those states could be considered insignificant backwaters... so far. Also, in most of Europe, no MAJOR wars between CIVILIZED peoples happened thus far; soon, however, they are likely to begin in Italy and Greece.

From west to east:

Tartessos, a south Iberian civilization under later Greek and Phoenicean influence owing to trade, is mostly famed for its mineral wealth (silver mines); it is an envy to all other Iberians, some of whom are quite pro-Tartessian and assimilated (in fact, some of them recently joined with Tartessos), while some others hold the proud city and its growing coastal realm in scorn. Tartessos is currently rather "backwater" when compared to the rest of the Mediterranean world, but, then again, as trade with the tin-rich northern island of Alba [2] slowly picks up for Carthage, there are large opportunities abound. It also has a small colony near the southern Pillar of Hercules, Tingis.

Etruscans have filled northern Italy, eventually creating an urban civilization of their own there. As time went by, it was divided into various small city-states; an unique one is Rome, which is populated not only by the Etruscans, but also by apparent Trojan colonists, supposedly descendants of an exiled Trojan prince, Aeneas. By 700 BC, the Etruscan realms were divided between two dominant cities that subjugated the others by a mix of war and diplomacy. It is Clusium, ruled by the Porsens dynasty, and Rome, ruled by the Tarquin dynasty; Clusian League, as it is called, is a much looser and more... Etruscan of the two, and less warlike; Roman League is under greater Greek (Trojan, to be more precise) influence and has developed a system of civilian colonies; it is very Rome-centric, without much power for the other cities within it. Rome is the more prosperous of the two, and its military training is superior, but Clusium could raise more forces if need be. So far, peaceful expansion coincided with border skirmishes, but soon, a war might begin between the two.

The early history of Greece - one of the first European civilizations, in fact, the only one that came before it is Crete - is not well-known, though recorded in folklore. Apparently, first came Myceneans, who fought many great wars against Troy and Minoa; ultimately, though defeating the two in a great naval battle at Thera (later recorded in the Achilliad), the Mycenean victory was a "Menelaic" one, i.e. it was a victory where the victor suffered even more then the defeated. That mostly seems to depict the truth that the wars between these three proved indecisive. By circa 1100, all three were exhausted, especially Mycenae. This allowed the Dorians and some others to overrun Mycenae, beginning the Dark Age there. However, by 800 BC several Greek city states already emerged; the leading amongst them were Sparta, Corinth and Athens. Greeks (beginning as early as 1000 BC) also founded numerous colonies on the southeastern Italian and eastern Sicilian coasts; one of these colonies, Syracuse, succesfully gained and defended its independance till 700 BC, but most others are in various degrees of dependance on Athens or Corinth, or Syracuse. In the recent century, a series of wars and treaties divided Greece between Sparta and Athens, apart from the buffer state of Corinth; but for how often will this arrangement last, especially taking into account the dissent within Athenian territories? Athens is a great naval power, but Spartan soldiers are already best-trained in the world. Strange as it might seem, by the way, Sparta is more-or-less succesfully competing in trade with Athens and Corinth thus far, even if Corinth's current superiority here is hard to deny. Also, in circa 770 BC or so, petty Macedonnian kings and tribal chieftains gathered in Pella to create a Macedonnian federation, out of fear of Athens. It is rather backwards, but has great potential, especially in alliance with, say, Sparta.

Minoa too suffered from the Dorian raids, but persisted, if battered. After 900 BC, the Minoans used their opportunate geographic situation to build a great fleet; they came into conflict with Phoeniceans and Trojans, but after the First Minoan War (738-719 BC), Minoa, though not recognized in all of its claims, managed to build a great maritime empire in the Eastern Mediterranean, prospering from the local trade. It also has two important mainland colonies: Cyrene in Africa and Cnidus in Anatolia.

Africa:

Carthage, a faraway and the greatest Phoenicean colony, gradually gained its independance from the mainstream Phoeniceans, only claiming full independance during the First Minoan War. By then, it was largely an independant city-state, which also had control over its extended surroundings, Sardinia, Malta and roughly half of Sicily; and recently, the Balearic Islands plus the outpost of Cartagena Nova were gained as well. Carthage is a great trade center of the Western Mediterranean.

Further east from Carthage, there is Egypt of the New Kingdom. Ever since its founding by al-Akamen, Egypt (with the capital in Akam) went through over 20 dynasties, and sruvived the deadly onslaught of the Sea Peoples. It expanded south and west greatly, crushing the Nubians and envelopping the Minoan colony of Cyrene. Despite a recent civil war, Egypt is a powerful state, though it is beginning to stagnate...

Middle East:

Troy was constantly raided and besieged, and even turned into a tributary, by the fearsome Hittites (apparently it was only circa 900 BC that the Hittites were defeated by the legendary Trojan hero, Hector, or so the legends say). But eventually, as the Hittites were crushed by the Lucans, the Trojans also built an empire of their own in West Anatolia, and even extended it across the Marmara to the city of Byzantium. They are still on the ascendant, despite not faring well in the First Minoan War, but now, they are faced with this problem - they don't have any real expansion room left, at least for peaceful expansion. So, war would be their only way out.

For long has the great empire of Luca, in the north of Anatolia, been peaceful and semi-isolated. But in circa 760 BC, circumstances forced it to go to war with the Hittites, a war that was won and that extended the Lucan realm further south, all the way to the Mediterranean Sea. This outlet greatly helped Lucan trade. All this signified something of an awakening call for Luca. The Grand Vizier and the Magi decided to build a navy, a small yet well-trained one, and with this tool they succeeded in their conquest of Bosporan [3] and some nearby lands. But this brought them into conflict with the horse-riding Scythians, whilst to the west, Troy threatens. This is a dangerous situation, yet a wise Vizier would surely find a way out...

The rise of the Phoeniceans in Levant was a slow and steady process, but ever since the legendary Philistine War (c. 1000) the coast was most definitely theirs. The rest was actually joined partially thanks to the cultural links between Canaanites and Phoeniceans. Phoenicea, however, was only barely saved from the Assyrian invaders in 948 BC, in the battle at Kadesh, where the Egyptian expeditionary corps saved the day and their trading partner. As for maritime expansion, it went well at first, but the First Minoan War cost Phoenicea half of Cyprus and, indirectly, Carthage with all other Western Mediterranean colonies. Still, at least eastern Cyprus and Cilicia are still Phoenicean, and besides, Tyre still is an important trade center.

The Akkadian Empire was replaced by the Assyrian one, and after the fall of Assyria in 763, it was (the second) Babylonia that ruled over much of Mesopatamia and Syria. The Babylonian Empire is still dominant there, and its current ruler, Nebuchadnazzer II, whose father cemented Babylonian power despite the Assyrian nobility's resistance, is likely to use the great armies placed at his disposal after the first emperor's death in not extremelly nice goals. Further south, Ur, which was only briefly conquered by Assyria in 785, is once more independant and thriving, but it is almost-literally surrounded with lethal threats...

The first civilized country in the world to use actual horsemen and the home of Zoroastrianism, Shahdom of Parhae has come to be rather recently, yet it already is quite a power. If only a good opportunity comes, Parhae will probably become a true empire.

India:

Ancient India, or rather, ancient Indus Valley was a battleground of the invading Aryan tribes and the defenders of Mohenjo-Daro; many great cities there were burned down in the greatest invasion of all thus far, in 866 BC, and before, too, a lot of violence took place; all this is remembered in the Dravidian epic poem, Vishnuvatra. So it was that Aryans were eventually pushed back even then. By 700 BC, there are four major states in India: Mohenjo-daro (and the other realms that united with it into a league), Magadha, Deccania and Kalinga. Numerous barbaric chiefdoms persist in the middle and the south of the subcontinent. Of these, Mohenjo-daro and Magadha are the strongest, and are often in conflict; Deccania is a rising power; Kalinga, for its part, is more of a maritime power.

India is still threatened by the Aryans, but as Mohenjo-daro is taking the brunt of the attacks, the others don't really give a damn by now.

China:

China was somewhat lagging behind technology-wise during this period, as it was still in Late Bronze Age. But other then that, the urban civilization in China developed quite well, and lots of pointless slaughter took place before the meaningful slaughter begun. The meaningful slaughter begun when the various Zhou states begun tearing each other apart in 1027 BC; ultimately by 829 BC, it will be divided into the Three Kingdoms: Yan, Qin and Wu. In a way, though, there was also a fourth kingdom: Hong Kong, created by a mix of the natives and the refugees fleeing the devastation of northern China. Now, while the Three Kingdoms of the North continued kicking each other around occasionally stopping to fight the various nomads, the banana-yellow-bannered Hong Kong expanded along the coastline in the south, and prospered. Hong Kong also became quite advanced, though not to the point of reaching the Iron Age... yet. Also, they discovered Taiwan, though an expedition there is yet to be undertaken.

OOC:

[1] La Venta, actually, but that's rather too Spanish. I know it was probably in OTL called something more... Olmecesque, but I failed to find any other names, so... Same with Sanlorenzo/San Lorenzo.

[2] Alba=Great Britain.

[3] Bosporan=Crimea.

Sorry, near the end I was really tired and hard-pressed for time, so...

Note: you can still join as new nations (on the borders of the current nations) during the IT. Better, however, to wait.

Pace for now is 1 turn=20 years, unless there are strong objections.

Azale, the area with the thin border is your personal realm, there you can do virtually anything you want, but in the other territories the local rulers might disagree with some of your politics, basically like a Senate.

BananaLee, is that "banana" enough for you? Also... who's your ruler again?

Everybody, if you need any sort of details on your history and/or the present state of affairs, tell me, tomorrow I will be able to reply. I realize that India and China sections in particular are very very general; largely thats because I did not (as already said) have a lot of time to finish them.

Rules editted, embarassing mistakes fixed.
 
IT I - Years 700-600 BC[1]

Americas:

Olmecia during this time period progressed in culture and science alike, even if slowly, and also expanded its economic, cultural and political influence greatly. However, the latter at least was impeded by the rise in circa 670 BC of a Zapotec state at Montealban. After cirac 655 BC the Olmecs went into a period of minor anarchy and after that a long-term stagnation, though by 600 BC the situation begun to somehow improve again.

Europe:

Europe had an unexpectedly-large amount of new players appearing during this period. It is hard to cover everything, but...

In Iberia, Tartessos, after some early improvements including the growth of trade, stagnated, while to its north, fearful of Tartessian, Carthaginian and Celtic expansionism, the Lusitanian Tribal Confederation formed in 688 BC. At first, it was indeed simply Lusitanian, but as time went by most Iberian tribes, facing the great Celtic invasion of 679, joined the LTC. However, this - along with the ideas of some foreign merchants who were greatly admired by the new chieftain, Alus - somehow got into their leadership's heads. Alus begun imposing Greek ideas of education, forced his tribesmen to build roads and ships and even started building a colonial empire, shipping out entire tribes to places they never heard of before. Naturally, this nearly destroyed the whole thing, but Alus luckily died (some claim, poisoned) and his son Raus took over. Realizing that the only thing that could save him and the LTC now was a great victory he... went forth and conquered Tartessos. This military victory allowed him to solidify his control and also allowed him to abolish LTC. Now all Lusitanians, Iberians, Celts and Tartessians who were under his rule were united into one kingdom... Portugal. Portugal also proceeded to use the Transpoenic War to conquer the Carthaginian colony in Iberia, albeit the attempt to invade Africa failed pathetically. Still, Portugal's rapid rise to prominence continued.

As Germannic and Baltic tribes pushed the Celts out of their easternmost lands, the Celtic tribes fled west, forcing those Celts already there to flee south, eventually invading Iberia in 679 BC. But Iberians fought back and begun reclaiming their lands, being united first by LTC and later by Portugal. The two Portuguese colonies at Armoria and Garonne, with their constant attacks on nearby Celts, created another problem. And finally, with the appearence of Kartyria, the Celts felt quite... cornered. Which is why they begun, since circa 640 BC, to unite around some stronger tribes and also begun building fortified towns; one tribe was especially interesting, the Arvernii of Gergovia, the most advanced and the most ambitious of them all. But their true glory was yet to come, it seemed.

Kartyria was formed in 672 BC, after a lenghty and hard journey of the Phoenicean refugees fleeing from Phoenciea, ravaged and conquered as it was by Lucans and Egyptians (see Middle East). The Phoenicean refugees have managed to ally with some nearby Ligurian tribes thanks to the charisma of King Agenor. Eventually, the Kartyrian control expanded to some other Ligurian tribes, for the most part peacefully, and much intermarrying took place. The Kartyrian people, a synthesis of Ligurians and Phoeniceans, arose, albeit later Phoenicean immigrants was less happy with this. In 623, the Carthaginians invaded Kartyria and put the fortress-city of Kartyr under siege, but the city, being well-supplied, lasted long enough for the 618 battles at Hiramon (north from Kartyr) and at Kartyr itself, resulting the expulsion of the Carthaginians. Kartyria, thus, survived its first 7 decades, but ahead of it still lied many challenges.

In Italia, things were... interesting. And largely revolved around the Roman League, which at the time was under the rule of the longest-reigning and perhaps the greatest of all Roman kings - Tarquinius the Great. Tarquinius' rule started out oddly - he simply gave up Tarquinii, the city of his origin (if a very rebellious one) to the Clusian League, with whom Rome was on the verge of a war. This act, albeit decried at first, later proved to be a wise one - Rome did not fight the Clusian League, and thus was free to participate in its greatest endeavor - the Hellenic Wars. In cooperation with Sparta, Romans conquered Corinthian and Athenian colonies in southern Italy within the first four decades of Tarquinius' rule, which were also marked by quiet prosperity and the wars with Italic tribes, such as Samnites who eventually were expelled into Lower Samnium on the Adriatic Coast (and later conquered as well - in the 625-621 campaign). It was in 672 that the greatest challenge came - the Third Hellenic War, with Syracuse, which seeked to gain control of Megala Hellas/Magna Graecia. The Syracusans, using the fact that Romans were distract to their southern border, besieged and nearly-took Rome (if not for the holy geese), but eventually, in 669 the siege was broken and the Romans in 658 invaded and conquered Syracusan lands in Megala Hellas. Syracuse, fearing Carthage, gave up on those lands, and Tarquinius signed with it and with Clusium the Pan-Italian Defensive Alliance. But while Romans were campaigning in Lower Samnium, Syracuse, which suffered a democratic revolution and was collapsing into anarchy again, was conquered by Carthage in a four-year campaign starting in 631 BC. Romans, oddly (or not?), did not reply despite the fact that the Carthaginians were distracted by the Kartyrian campaign/Transpoenic War at the same time. But even with Tarquinius' death in 627 BC and the Carthaginian ascendancy, Rome's future seemed secure.

Macedonnian Federation during this century did not have an enviable fate. In 699, Phillp II led the Macedonnians to war against Thracians, but little gain was made during the lenghty campaign, while in 688 King Priam of Troy started a great invasion of Macedonnia, taking Pella itself. However, the Macedonnians regroupped and prepared to counter-attack. As the Trojans set out to march across West Macedonnia to take Corcyra, the last great Macedonnian fort-city, they were in 673 met by Phillip and his forces coming from different directions at Haliacmon. In the fierce battle that followed, only the supreme training and great courage allowed parts of the Trojan Army, including Priam and an eventually-important army captain by the name of Eram, to survive and retreat to Byzantium - but Troy seemed doomed. Priam, however, had another trick up his sleeve - he allied with Seuthes, the Thracian high king, who seeked to retake the lands lost to the Macedonnians. The last two phases of the epic Trojan-Macedonnian conflict, as recorded in the even more epic Trojan/Byzantine poem Eramiade, or the Journeys of Eram, preceded or coincided with the Great War. Macedonnian armies, assisted by the Spartans and formed into phalanx, first were defeated by the Trojan Eastern Army at Doriscus (660), but later won a greater victory, at Abdera (658), and another one at Byzantium (657). The Spartan-Macedonnian armies marched on to conquer Troy itself (see Middle East), and Priam himself died in the fighting, but the Trojan Western Army, linking up with Seuthes' main force, conquered much of the unprotected Macedonnian homeland in circa 650 BC. Eram himself commanded there, eventually, as Seuthes died, rising to prominence as Lord of the North, ruler of Thracians and Trojan refugees alike. As Spartans and their allies faced defeat in the Great War, in 619 the last Macedonnians were crushed by the aging Eram, the founder of the Trojan-Thracian Byzantine Empire.

Parallel to Rome's Hellenic Wars, Sparta unified all of Greece under its rule. The great king Mermerus I Midylos, who through skillful diplomacy made Sparta a trade center and also made it a center of learning, was perhaps even more famed for his conquest of Corinth (693) and the beginning of war with Athens (673 BC-659 BC). Having ruled up until the end of that, he however died on the day before Athens surrendered; the Aetolian polises, which betrayed Athens in the decisive battle at, appropriately, Athens, received large amounts of autonomy under the new king, Agenor Midylos. Agenor made great military reforms and helped Macedonnia crush Troy and finally invaded Luca in the Great War. After his death from a lightning in 640 BC and the brief succession crisis Demetrios Midylos rejected the throne, fearing the intrigues of the Spartan nobles. Under Leonidos Midylos, however, the Spartan military fortunes in the Great War declined (see Middle East) to such a point that he, in 632, died with much of his army in the disastrous retreat across Lucan lands. Mermerus II succeeded, but he inherited a ruined realm, impoverished by the war effort and only saved from utter destruction at the Byzantine hands by the fact that Eram's new empire was fighting a battle to the death with the Free, or Danubean, or Rebel Scythians. But sadly Mermerus II was not a man of great political ability, and Sparta's glory was unlikely to be revived...

Africa:

Here, we must pay attention to three points of interest.

In Mauri [2], as Tartessian colony at Tingis became neglected after circa 680 BC, not much happened until a Lusitanian "colony" was established in 676 BC. It was not very prosperous, ofcourse, and hardly had any serious use until 633 BC when LTC invaded and conquered Tartessos. Tartessian colony was conquered as well... giving the new Portugal complete control over the Pillars of Hercules, something that, in the face of trade with Alba, is a positive boon.

Carthage, with its great fleet, defeat in Kartyria but victory in Syracuse and finally Emperor Hannibal's great reforms of 611, was also a great trade power quite capable of this and further military effort. But the time of its true glory - or of its downfall, or both - was yet to come...

Egypt's attention during this time was, largely, centered on the Middle East (see Middle East, what else?). Not having much else to do, the Egyptians tried to expand southwards (to not much avail) and introduced a new currency. All this lack of attention to domestic problems somehow decreased the people's trust in the government... but yet, this had no effect.

Middle East:

Of this region, we cannot speak in the terms of realms I believe. We must speak in the terms of wars, for there was no time without wars here, and the short, eight-year at most periods of peace were only used to prepare for the new ones.

It all begun with the Babylonian War, you know. Babylonia was so powerful that its neighbours, or some of them at least, grew fearful, and started forming a coalition - Luca, Parhae and Ur allied to face this threat. Some believe they wanted to attack first, but what really happened was that the Babylonians were the first to strike as they invaded Ur in 692 BC. Ur was mostly crushed by 690 BC, the royal family with remnants of the army fleeing to Gur in the southeast. But at this point, Parhae and Luca invaded Babylonia; upon hearing of this, Nebuchadnazzer II burned down the cities of Ur, Uruk and Nippur and salted all farms, devastating Urian lands so much that Ur never recovered. By then, Parhaens threatened Babylon itself and Lucans overran West Assyria; the former were crushed at Tutub, but the latter, in a great battle at Carchemish in 688, managed to defeat the Babylonians and kill Nebuchadnazzer (the Lucans owed this victory to their Battle-Cars). Parhaens and Urians, recovering, too invaded Babylonia, while local nobals begun fighting each other in central Mesopatamia. Another interesting event was the Caucasian migration southwards; this eventually led to the birth of the nation of Hay-Urartu in northern Mesopatamia, an important Lucan ally.

After two years of resting, Lucans struck south, at Phoenicea. Phoeniceans by then already were engaged in a great struggle against the Egyptians who treacherously attacked their former allies. The Egyptians, however, were not as succesful as they hoped, being defeated on the sea and failing to take Tyre in the land offensive, if occupying the southern lands. The Lucan invasion, too, stalled near Sidon; King Hiram, meanwhile, rallied Phoeniceans to great resistance. But finally, in 678 BC, starving Tyre fell - but not before its defenders commited suicide. Sidon fell slightly earlier. But the great mass of Phoenicean people by then was in flight west... to Carthage and Kartyria.

In 666 BC, the Lucan-hired Black Army conquered Minoa, whilst the Lucan fleet devastated the Minoan one in the Battle at Hellespont (Minoans were nearby to help Spartans conquer Athens). But the conquest of Minoa was hardly complete; when the governor of now-united Cyprus tried to surrender the island to the Lucans, he was overthrown by Phoenicean and Minoan rebels, who held on to Cyprus for quite a while beyond the century's end. But the Magi had greater issues to attend to - the Grand Vizier Achae was found dead at the hands of "Egyptian" assassins, shortly before the invasion of Minoa begun.

Parhae for the first forty decades of the century did not only fight Babylonians and grow its Asbaran horde; no, it also expanded east, fighting the Iranians, and in 670 started the invasion of Ur, conquering most of it though parts fell to Semitic tribes of Arabia. The Iranian conquests were later abandoned after the Great War begun.

Time has come to mention this conflict, the culmination of the ascendancy of Sparta and Luca. In 656, Troy fell to the Spartan and Macedonnian forces who used a horse-shaped siege tower to especially great effect (interestingly enough later siege towers were since then often called "horses" or "siege horses"). By 655, all Trojan resistance was squashed, and Luca stood threatened from all or most directions. Agenor of Sparta succesfully allied with the Scythians, the Egyptians and the Parhaens, as well as vengeful Phoeniceans from Kartyria and the Cypriot Rebels. Against them stood Luca and Hay-Urartu, and powerful as the former was, it seemed that it stood no chance. Scythians conquered Bosporan, Spartans invaded Luca Proper and were only barely stopped at Astya, the capital, "Punic Heroes" landed in the south bringing with themselves revenge, death and destruction, Egyptians faced not much resistance as they like a dagger threatened Lucan possessions in Anatolia and only Parhaens faced not much success due to a well-planned Lucan counter-attack. By 640 BC Luca seemed doomed, especially as there was no Grand Vizier to save it.

But the Magi found a most unlikely candidate who, however, saved Luca. They found the fearsome Scythian warlord Aramu the One-eyed (or the Scythian), whose ambitions drove him to accept the Lucan offer. Aramid Luca was born.

Now, it must be said that Aramu did not control ALL the Scythians. Far from it. The Caucasian and the Volga Scythians were completely free from his rule, and the Danubean Scythians mutinied not wishing to go so far away from their native steppes. But nonetheless, at his disposal was a great horde of fierce warriors and capable horsemen, who were more then enough to save Luca. Ofcourse, the death of Agenor and the defection of Egypt from the Anti-Lucan Coalition might have helped turn the tide of the war as well, but even if those two events didn't happen... the Scythians were just too strong for the Coalition. While Lucans played land for time, the Aramid Scythians overran much of Caucasus and got ready to win their warlord an even greater empire. First, Aramu personally crushed the Spartan-Punic army at Trapezus, and routed it, destroying most of it and killing Leonidos and Agenor in 632 BC. Troy was enter in 629, and all of Anatolia was united under Lucan rule. The Egyptians withdrew from Lucan lands, and the Aramids succesfully attacked Parhae, albeit at Babylon they were at first dealt a nasty defeat. Yet, as Mohenjo-daran forces invaded from the east, Parhae stood no chance, and despite Padishah Shapur's heroic resistance the Aramid-Hay-Urartian forces met the Mohenjo-darans at Isfahan in 611 BC. The Great War, apart from the naval war with the Cypriots, was over. Luca won and emerged even greater then before - if thoroughly pillaged and ruled by a foreigner.
 
India:

The greatest power in India was Mohenjo-daro, even if this empire was rather loose due to the great extent of autonomy possessed by the southern, northern and easternmost chieftains and kings. This empire immediately - in 700 BC - embarked on the preparations for the great campaigns of the then-General Jiva, which kicked off in 698. Three Mohenjo-daran armies, a thousand men in each, marched west to confront the ever-present Aryan menace. Aryans, who were by no means organized nor prepared to fight a DEFENSIVE war, were naturally taken by surprise and driven west in large amounts by this (698-691) and a second (689-682); the campaign, after another five year break, resumed in 677, with the eventual result of Aryans either subjugated, either massacred, either fleeing north, where they mixed with the equally-fleeing Iranians to become... Aranians. Ofcourse, some Aryans later returned south in 654 BC, and a large amount of Iranians lived on separately in the north... but anyway. This triumph allowed Jiva to rise to power in 672 after the death of the previous emperor, whose name history and the moderator forgot. In India itself at the time Mohenjo-daro, despite an alliance with Deccania, did not do much apart from a minor attempt to expand eastwards by the means of diplomacy, that brought not much gain. The Mohenjo-daran attention returned to India when in circa 650 BC Kuru-Pañcala arose to the east of the empire. Despite the (admittedly-small) degree of Aryan blood in the ruling family of Kuru-Pañcala, a royal marriage was arranged. Thus, Mohenjo-daro by the end of the century had good relations with Deccania and cordial with Kuru-Pañcala, and all this meant that now, Mohenjo-daro's borders were secure in the east, or so it seemed. The western border, after the Great War (see Middle East), was extended greatly but it too was quite safe, as to the west the vassal state of Cyrusid Parhae served as a bulwark against the great power of Luca. To the north, however, the Aranian tribes begun to rise in strenght, whilst the Aryans, due to the chieftains cruelly enslaving or massacring them, rebelled in the western (thankfully, the poorer) part of the empire (initially Jiva, probably anticipating that, wanted not to give those lands - two-thirds of his early Aryan conquests - to the vengeful autonomous chieftains and kings, their threats of seccession made him submit to their demands). The great rebellion, started in 623 BC, raged on well beyond the end of the century, despite all efforts to crush it.

Kalinga started this century uneventfully - by expanding in Burma and fighting some minor nearby tribes. Some claim that King Omprakash grew so bored with it all that he actually prayed to Vishnu asking him to make the Magadhans invade Kalinga or something. Whether it was so or not, the Magadhans, in 687 BC, did verily invade - taking Shripurushottama and besieging the capital, Sampa (the assault failed due to heroic resistance of the garrison and the levied forces, as did the attempt of attacking the third Kalingan city, Vishakhapatnam). Despite the succesful defense of Sampa, the Kalingan situation looked dire and called either for flight to Burma, either a very good plan. Omprakash, however, resolved not to lose the city, and in one of ancient India's greatest battles he defend the city against the second assault, while one of his relatives, Hemachandra, led the much-famed "Charge of the Whitecloaks", which, despite heavy casualties, utterly devastated the Magadhan army (the Battle at Sampa, according to most sources, took place in 675; how Sampa survived the siege for so long is unknown, but probably it was the naval supremacy of the Kalingans that allowed this). Not to sit on their laurels, the Kalingans also launched an invasion from Burma, which despite the attrition succesfully approached the capital of Magadha - Pataliputra. Only Ganges stood between them, but apparently, at this point a horrible disease - a curse of the Magadhan king, some say - struck Omprakash, who went insane. The army did not use its chance, fearing that its commanders will be berrated for attacking without orders and thinking that the king/the regent had a plan. Then Hemachandra, the regent [3], died as well, and so the army did not do anything, in a twenty-year period known as "The Great Eying-Down" or "The Great Stalemate". The situation was not much better back at home, where the buerocrats grew horribly corrupt and the state was near-immobilized for some decades, or so it was said (only Queen Meghana I and her reforms reversed that in the later two decades of the century), but finally in 637 the new general of the army in the north (the previous one, Kurake, was sacked) and the old one of the southern, at Mehul's (Mehul being the brother of Queen Meghana and essentially the chief of staff, though they obviously didn't call it that in ancient India) urgings, struck the final blow on Magadha, or begun striking it at least. In a war of maneuver, the Kalingans managed, eventually, to defeat the Magadhan army, capture Pataliputra and kill Udayashatru, the Magadhan king. Magadha, thusly beheaded, collapsed in the northwest into small warlord domains, albeit the heir to the throne, Bimbisara, survived and tried to organize further resistance. He was defeated and captured in 618 BC, and the rest of Magadha by the end of the century was firmly under Kalingan control.

Deccania expanded steadily during this time, gaining not really much land. However, their teams of jungle-cutters are worth mention, as they greatly helped develop those lands gained, and later they would be imitated by other Indian states as well. The state-encouraged rise of Hinduism during this century culminated with the Coup of 673 BC, when rajan Dinesh II was overthrown by the Hindu priests and his little son Dinesh III came to power... throughout his life, he was a will-less puppet of the Hindu priests, who, however, after the first few years of vigorous government and missionary effort, succumbed to corruption and sloth, not much development taking place until the reing of Dinesh IV begun in 619 BC, who outmaneuvered the priests in his bid for full power and started many public works until in 601 he was assassinated and the priests came back to power.

During this century, apart from Kuru-Pañcala, two other new states rose in India - Chola on the southern tip of the subcontinent and Sinhala on the island of Ceylon. Both of these were important maritime powers.

China:

The Three Warring States of Northern China, for the first thirty decades of this century, did little, albeit some minor border clashes naturally took place. Needlessly-antagonized by the Qin, the well-trained Wu army in 670 BC marched out to invade it, but soon the eastern part of the army had been attacked itself by the more numerous Qin. Albeit losing the battle at Qinglianggang, the Wu won at Tari in 667, commanded by the great Commander De La Fey as they were [4] [5]. The western part of the army, however, maneuvered through Sinite lands and besieged Yong in 665. To make sure that their victory is complete, the Wu, now led by Queen Wu Xi, one of the most remarkable women in Chinese history, allied with the northern Yan, with whom they partitioned the Qin lands (after the Qin were crushed by the two armies) by a famed treaty of 640 BC. Famed because immediately after it, Wu Xi's forces invaded Yan. Guang Xu, Sha Fla Fey and Wu Xi herself led the Wu to victory, uniting Northern China into the Empire of Wu, Qin and Yan; it was, however, at Wu Xi's last request renamed into the Han Empire. But ofcourse this century in Northern China was not just a one filled with constant warfare and rigorous training programs; no, this was a time of agricultural development, taxing of the rich, worshipping of the ancestors, building of the cities and infinitive verbing of the nouns.

By contrast from their nonetheless-bellicose neighbours, the Hong Kees stayed out of wars during this period. Instead, Hong Kong was a place of trade, high-prestige education and cultural development. The Hong Kees also obtained several Sinite and Taiwanese territories thanks to cultural assimilation and stole the secret of blue pottery from the Wu, something with doubtlessly-heavy reprecussions in the future. The Hong Kee sailors also... sailed to many lands, and met interesting people all the way from Choson and Kyushu to Sumatra. The vast Hong Kee trade network also greatly benefited them, expanding as it did. And finally, in circa 640 BC the work on a great wonder of the world - the Kowloon Academy - started. Hong Kong looked forward to a happy future, but as the Sinites grew more bellicose and the northern states united under Han rule, this future was suddenly threatened.

OOC:

[1] Technically, 700-620 BC, but I decided to include the Transpoenic War and some other events that I mentioned in the last IT I update...

[2] Mauri=Morocco.

[3] Or so it was assumed by most historians. Feel free to correct them, NK.

[4] Commanded by a commander. No comment.

[5] Not sure if he commanded there, or in a previous battle.

Feel free to correct me if you want.
 
I like the remark infinite verbing of the nouns, and don't like bannanalee stealing our blue pottery secrets!!!! :sad:
 
And the panda jumped over the building...

Well, I didn't steal it per se.. It was more like.. reverse engineering. Yeah, that's it! Reverse engineering!
And now, to innovate PINK pottery!!!!
 
I didn't tell you to post yet, damnit! Do you want me to create one more player spot so that Contempt could join? :p

Not sure how to threaten the others.

World Map 600 BC:
 

Attachments

  • ITNESI World Map 600 BC.GIF
    ITNESI World Map 600 BC.GIF
    80 KB · Views: 293
but on post 6 it says to feel free to correct u! and also, personally i think players that got wiped out should be able to choose if they want to rejoin or not... i mean, they got wiped out maybe u should give them something to make them feel better...
 
Yes, do create one more slot for me...I dare say China would quite enjoy it.
 
The Hong Kong one might. ;)
 
Too true, too true. ;)
 
I thought it said in the update that we defeated Cyprus later...?
 
Much later. "It survived well beyond this century" or somesuch. You'll defeat it during the BT, MOST LIKELY.
 
Whatev, whatev.
 
Whilst I toil away at BT II Update, I would like to bring up an althist discussion. What if Aramu died in the fighting in Bosporan? He was wounded there, after all. Had he died, the Scythians might have fallen apart again, and even if not, it is unlikely that his successor would have sent the infamous "Tribute Messnager" to Asatya.
 
Top Bottom