He claims to have a black father. So did Rachel Dolezal. I'm not aware of any evidence that his claim is true and her claim was shown to be false by genealogical tests.
Don't get me wrong, I don't personally give a crap, but I can see how people would get upset. And since there is no actual evidence to back his claim and we know that two white parents are named on his birth certificate and we know that people can become convinced of the truth of a personal identity that is actually a fiction... I just don't think being so utterly convinced that x is the case rather than y is a smart position to hold.
Not that any of this has anything whatsoever to do with the topic of this thread, but all I see are the usual uncorroborated accusations from Breitbart of all places.
I also see no mention of "genealogical tests" to confirm or deny his real father was a light-skinned black man as he claims.
So we are supposed to believe he masqueraded as a biracial person as early as 14 without anybody being the least bit suspicious?
No. We're 'supposed to believe' that he might actually be white. Or he might be black. But most importantly that there isn't enough evidence to be dismissing the suggestion that he might indeed be white as some sort of unsubstantiated rubbish intended purely as a slur. The guy's birth certificate says his parents were white.
I'm sorry, i'm confused; which of the things I said 'might' be the case when I explained yhat we couldn't be sure left you thinking that I had 100% accuracy about anything?
Yet you keep mentioning it, as though it really means anything at all in this particular regard.
I'm far more curious why his parents and relatives didn't think it was odd he was trying to "pass" as a non-white at 14. Who was he trying to fool with that hair and skin tone?
It's at least as relevant as his claim to be black. We can't know either way unless he gets a genealogy test done. This uncertainty on the matter is my point.
Who, except more or less Kaiserguard is actually defending the guy though? The only thing wolf said is he trolls all over the place, so his gamergate comments may have to be taken with a grain of salt just as much as everything else he did. That said I'd easily consider himself to be posting online hate speech. Hate speech is hate speech, whether it was intended seriously or trolling. I hope he does get prosecuted under the fullest extent of the law.
Some people are encountering a troll in the wild for the first time, so naturally they have problems with trying to figure out allegiances, sort of like fake cops.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.