Judge Says: Simpsons = child porn

[Bill3000]

Hm, yes. I guess that Japanese marriage between a man and an anime woman is legal then.

 

[Aegis]

In case anyone missed it, the Judge's reasoning is that cartoon child-porn will fuel the demand for real child-porn, thus causing children to be abused.

 

[Sui Generis]

Well, can Australians get political asylum in America so they can watch there Simpsons porn without fear of persecution? lmfao.

 

[Volum]

In case anyone missed it, the Judge's reasoning is that cartoon child-porn will fuel the demand for real child-porn, thus causing children to be abused.

I've seen several pictures of Bart and Lisa.......going at it but yet i've never felt the need to see child-porn.

I also saw a picture of Brian Griffin using his tongue on Louis Griffin, yet bestiality hasn't really been my thing

I MUST BE A TICKING BOMB!

 

[Mad Man]

Does this mean anime will be baned in Australia now

 

[Bill3000]

In case anyone missed it, the Judge's reasoning is that cartoon child-porn will fuel the demand for real child-porn, thus causing children to be abused.

Right, and that reasoning is still false, because the aesthetic qualities lol between an animated character and a child are different enough such that they are completely different fetishes.

 

[Jazzmail]

In case anyone missed it, the Judge's reasoning is that cartoon child-porn will fuel the demand for real child-porn, thus causing children to be abused.

This judge should be shot.

By the same logic you could blame a rape victim for the crime for being attractive enough to the rapist.

In most civilizad nations we put the blame for crimes on the actual perpetrator.

 

[Bill3000]

This judge should be shot.

By the same logic you could blame a rape victim for the crime for being attractive enough to the rapist.

In most civilizad nations we put the blame for crimes on the actual perpetrator.

I'd say "no, that's not a good comparison, because cartoon characters can't be victims", but apparently they're persons.

 

[ThePrussian]

Nice logic there. /sarcasm

Child Pornography is illegal for the same reason that being a civilian in possession of a nuclear bomb, driving while intoxicated, set fires or fire a gun into the air is illegal. It creates the risk of injury, property loss or death.

 

[Jazzmail]

I'd say "no, that's not a good comparison, because cartoon characters can't be victims", but apparently they're persons.

A better comparison would be arresting half of the film industry, because depictions of a fictional killing could incite some loony to really murder someone.

 

[Bill3000]

Child Pornography is illegal for the same reason that being a civilian in possession of a nuclear bomb, driving while intoxicated, set fires or fire a gun into the air is illegal. It creates the risk of injury, property loss or death.

No, it's because it depicts the abuse of children and harms the children depicted within the images for their entire life. It's not because it creates risk.

 

[Aegis]

I've seen several pictures of Bart and Lisa.......going at it but yet i've never felt the need to see child-porn.

I also saw a picture of Brian Griffin using his tongue on Louis Griffin, yet bestiality hasn't really been my thing

I MUST BE A TICKING BOMB!

You must be!

btw, I was not agreeing with the Judge; I was merely conveying his reasoning, in case someone missed it.

 

[Labtec600]

Wait a minute....Bart was COMPLETELY NAKED in the Simpons movie...does that mean that move is Pornographic filth and all that buy that dvd should be arrested for possessing child pornography????

 

[Mad Man]

Wait a minute....Bart was COMPLETELY NAKED in the Simpons movie...does that mean that move is Pornographic filth and all that buy that dvd should be arrested for possessing child pornography????

Why yes!

 

[Annex]

Why yes!

Maybe Matt Greoning should be arrested for inspiring the Simpsons porn which in turn inspires people to look at real child porn.

 

[Mad Man]

maybe the Simpsons should be arrested for making the porn.

 

[Labtec600]

No, apparently he should be arrested for distributing child pornography along with the movie studios.

Man, wonder what kind of ambulance chasing lawyers will this bring out. Studios releasing such filth to young children, all under the guise of PG (maybe PG-13). The amount of distress this can cause is easlily worth a million a piece.

 

[CCA]

LOL @ everyone thinking that they have a better grasp of legal concepts and the nuances of making a complex decision than an actual jobs.

Don't ya'll be rushing to quit your day jobs.

 

[Mowque]

LOL @ everyone thinking that they have a better grasp of legal concepts and the nuances of making a complex decision than an actual jobs.

I understand the point, but does this mean we can;t even question a judge?

 

[Mad Man]

Don't ya'll be rushing to quit your day jobs.

too late