Kingdom Come: Deception (Game Thread)

It's something I should hold against him then.

Why the TS vote?
dont blieve any of the questions hes asking he cares about

feeeeeeeels wolfy

Tim, when have I ever been dangerous?

Never, ever. ;)

I'm still waiting for your inner tunnel to come out. You can't help it.

Visor, thoughts on Csargo?

Dolby, thoughts on Rask?

Rakkoon, what do you think of Tim?
this post is just wolfy
 
dont blieve any of the questions hes asking he cares about

feeeeeeeels wolfy

That's what I meant by "master of laying low while still speaking out." TS always participates plenty, but wolf or town that participation is just...shallow. It doesn't mean he's a wolf, but it doesn't mean that he's town...he's just dangerous.
 
Csargo, I don't hate illiterate people, it is just I know my enemy is illiterate.
 
Csargo, I don't hate illiterate people, it is just I know my enemy is illiterate.
fetchimage


insert text so arakhor doesnt ban me
 
Csargo, I don't hate illiterate people, it is just I know my enemy is illiterate.

Given the time period of the historical flavor I'd guess that most of us are illiterate, but if we all actively role play as illiterate there won't be much of a game. What is this about "know my enemy is illiterate" though?
 
I feel like I should just vote LA, to protect myself from his incoming vigilante justice.
 
this post is just wolfy
Nope. I want answers. I just approach differently. You accuse/vote people to see reactions. I ask questions. It's less intrusive (shallow as Tim calls it). But it's how I look at reactions.

You can lynch me now, but I am innocent. Or you can just kill me later, Master Visor. :shifty:

What do you think of Csargo?

Not to mention the fact I was confusing TS with someone else this entire time. :shifty:
Confirmed illiterate.

Csargo, I don't hate illiterate people, it is just I know my enemy is illiterate.
That's what I was looking for when I asked about your enemy. So you've got a personal vendetta/goal against another player.
 
That's what I was looking for when I asked about your enemy. So you've got a personal vendetta/goal against another player.

Or more likely he doesn't. We could lose day one down a rabbit hole of who is illiterate, who isn't, and whether it really means anything in connection to Argon's mysterious role, or just in general. That benefits no one but the wolves. The real problem being that whether we lose day one down that rabbit hole or not, we will be in the exact same position day two, three, four...until Argon gets killed. I hate saying that, because he is so much fun to have around, but to the wolves that constant supply of chaos is just invaluable.
 
That's what I meant by "master of laying low while still speaking out." TS always participates plenty, but wolf or town that participation is just...shallow. It doesn't mean he's a wolf, but it doesn't mean that he's town...he's just dangerous.
In a world where you are wolf, it's convenient for you if I die because I (and pzelda) played with you as partners. I know (somewhat) how you thought as a wolf.

Doesn't mean you are a wolf, but that thought occurred to me. :hide:

nah i ask questions the same way (see every game ive played recently)

your tone just feels wolfy

sorry bronana
M'kay. :twitch:
 
My desire for an illiterate person's destruction has nothing to do with my role. It is just what I have decided as my day one shenanigans before I actually try when we get more information and is based on the reply to the role pm
 
Visor, thoughts on Csargo?

Dolby, thoughts on Rask?

Rakkoon, what do you think of Tim?
My question, is why these people and this way round? An obvious answer would be that you have been in games with these people, and the askee (ie. Visor in the 1st line) was more reliable source of judgement than the target (Csargo in the 1st line). Is this consistent with the facts?
 
I feel like I should just vote LA, to protect myself from his incoming vigilante justice.

I'm not going to count any vote that hasn't been emboldened.

I've added a player-list to the OP and I will post an updated tally in the morning (BST).
 
In a world where you are wolf, it's convenient for you if I die because I (and pzelda) played with you as partners. I know (somewhat) how you thought as a wolf.

Doesn't mean you are a wolf, but that thought occurred to me. :hide:

And my first thought as a wolf was "I am stuck, my play style is established and distinctive and I will have to play this out exactly the same way." And I proceeded to do that. And it worked. Since you know how I thought as a wolf do you see any good reason why I would try playing differently this game if I was a wolf?

you got any thought on anyones alignment, samson?

@Samson, now is your time to shine.
 
My question, is why these people and this way round? An obvious answer would be that you have been in games with these people, and the askee (ie. Visor in the 1st line) was more reliable source of judgement than the target (Csargo in the 1st line). Is this consistent with the facts?
I'm trying to see how Csargo and Visor react to each other. Csargo has provided input on Visor, but not so much the opposite direction.

Dolby's last game was mafia and I wanted to see his tone towards Rask.

And Rakkoon just isn't interacting much, so I chose someone who would interact with whatever he said. Tim will reply. :lol:
 
The specificness of topsecrets questions is the first thing that I can really put my finger on. Why would a townie be so specific about pairs of people to ask about, with direconallity to the requests.
 
Back
Top Bottom