AOS9001
Slightly over 9000.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2009
- Messages
- 1,169
According to my research, the only civs running manorialism are the civs with lots of unimproved land (France, HRE, Russia, with Spain, Poland, and Sweden sometimes joining in). Otherwise it's caste system in Europe. You'd think huge civs like Turkey and Mughals would want to use manorialism, but no, they stick with slavery. It seems to me manorialism is a niche civic for big European civs without many resources.
And yes, vassalage isn't useful, in the AI's eyes. The only civ consistently running it is England. Everyone else runs citizenship, which builds those vital core buildings like markets and libraries faster. That's so much more broadly useful than vassalage's units produced with . I pretty much only run citizenship or theocracy ( from buildings I was going to construct anyways? Sign me up!) until individualism or central planning is unlocked.
Manorialism and vassalage are civics that need another look, I agree with that. I think bureaucracy is fine as it is, though admittedly it's a very strong combination with regulated trade (and national college on top of that). It's definitely a huge boon for civs with a prime city like Portugal or Netherlands that's going to be carrying the civ. I don't think that's a bad thing. Maybe national college should be put behind Academia instead of Education, and maybe regulated trade should be behind Finance instead of Guilds? Regulated trade and bureaucracy are more associated with the late middle ages/renaissance than high middle ages in my opinion, anyway.
And yes, vassalage isn't useful, in the AI's eyes. The only civ consistently running it is England. Everyone else runs citizenship, which builds those vital core buildings like markets and libraries faster. That's so much more broadly useful than vassalage's units produced with . I pretty much only run citizenship or theocracy ( from buildings I was going to construct anyways? Sign me up!) until individualism or central planning is unlocked.
Manorialism and vassalage are civics that need another look, I agree with that. I think bureaucracy is fine as it is, though admittedly it's a very strong combination with regulated trade (and national college on top of that). It's definitely a huge boon for civs with a prime city like Portugal or Netherlands that's going to be carrying the civ. I don't think that's a bad thing. Maybe national college should be put behind Academia instead of Education, and maybe regulated trade should be behind Finance instead of Guilds? Regulated trade and bureaucracy are more associated with the late middle ages/renaissance than high middle ages in my opinion, anyway.