Leaderhead Database and Request thread

Ahh, well I would argue that a Pitt leaderhead should be used for Jefferson, not the other way around, seeing how much more important Pitt was. (I know you will disagree being American, but oh well. :p)

George V and Nicholas were similar, though one would have to change around the uniforms and medals and the like, even though I would almost like to see George V in his military uniform.

Tsar_Nicholas_II_%26_King_George_V.JPG
 
Welcome back, GeneralMatt.

Hello, can't say I am really back, but am hanging about looking for useful stuff and thought it would be worth a try to ask for these fellow, though I have been debating finding a way to release a few pieces of art I have puttered away at for my own ends in the past while, though I am not sure if they are release worthy.

The nose is a bit off to be Hamilton, though I am sure any model could be modified even further to be whoever one wished.

I was surprised that with all the leaderheads coming out there is but one new British leader, and even then it was a simple reskin. Considering the talented fellows that led, Disraeli and Gladstone, Salisbury, the people I listed, perhaps Marlborough, it is disappointing.
 
Hello, can't say I am really back, but am hanging about looking for useful stuff and thought it would be worth a try to ask for these fellow, though I have been debating finding a way to release a few pieces of art I have puttered away at for my own ends in the past while, though I am not sure if they are release worthy.

I hope you find a way to release them. :)
 
I was surprised that with all the leaderheads coming out there is but one new British leader, and even then it was a simple reskin. Considering the talented fellows that led, Disraeli and Gladstone, Salisbury, the people I listed, perhaps Marlborough, it is disappointing.

England (being the civ-equivalent of Britain I suppose) already has three leaders, also there are no British LH-makers except for NikNaks and I haven't seen him around in quite a while. There's your answer.

EDIT: And of course I don't mean people only make LHs for their own culture/country, I just mean the probability is higher. For example Ekmek has created two American presidents, one CSA president, and two CSA generals and he is American. He also is responsible for the majority of American LHs out there, DutchKing being the other (Patton and Roosevelt) and I am relatively sure he is American. Also Thatcher has been discussed numerous times and it seems to be a pretty difficult LH to make.
 
England (being the civ-equivalent of Britain I suppose) already has three leaders, also there are no British LH-makers except for NikNaks and I haven't seen him around in quite a while. There's your answer.

EDIT: And of course I don't mean people only make LHs for their own culture/country, I just mean the probability is higher. For example Ekmek has created two American presidents, one CSA president, and two CSA generals and he is American. He also is responsible for the majority of American LHs out there, DutchKing being the other (Patton and Roosevelt) and I am relatively sure he is American. Also Thatcher has been discussed numerous times and it seems to be a pretty difficult LH to make.

but i did make a George III back in the day. But the colonization one is better. And there is a cromwell out there. BUt I think the lack of brits is that we've been trying to fill some gaps on other civs. but a margaret thatcher would be cool.
 
Your George III could be used for Joseph of Austria as well. I'll admit the Col George III doesn't look as much as the actual king, but his animations suit his personality better (he was insane).
 
The thing is, for George III, the insanity bit, plus the fact he never really did anything, disqualifies him from civ for me at all really. Any one of the three I suggested would be much better suited, George V being arguable, and I really don't know why someone like George III would be suitable for colonization, one of the Prime Ministers would be far and away a better choice.

Montgomery would be interesting in its own right, but the most he achieved was a place in the Lords, he wasn't around long enough, and by that time a Prime Minister in the Lords wasn't common at all, the last one to do it was Salisbury I believe, though do not quote me on that.
It would be a waste of talent to under take that really, seeing how little there is going about it seems, unless someone had a specific reason to have a non-nation leader as a leader.
 
George III won the Seven Years' War. Unlike his predecessors George I and II, he had considerable control. (For the era of George I and II, I'd have Robert Walpole as a leader.)
 
Just as much as Queen Anne won the War of the Spanish Succession, yes... George III still doesn't cut it in my books, compared to the real great men in history, he did very little, about as much as Edward II...
 
Of course, I quite like George VI, but I am trying to be specific with the very best for now, there seems to be so little talent going around for British leaderheads I want to make sure the most important ones get done first.

In reality, George V would be the same, so he is quite low priority.
 
A little off topic here, but the Colonization english king leaderhead is of George II and not George III. He looks a little batty in the game, but the portrait is based on this one of George II.
 

Attachments

  • 180px-George_II_of_Great_Britain-01.jpg
    180px-George_II_of_Great_Britain-01.jpg
    11.9 KB · Views: 80
Ahh, well I would argue that a Pitt leaderhead should be used for Jefferson, not the other way around, seeing how much more important Pitt was. (I know you will disagree being American, but oh well. :p)

George V and Nicholas were similar, though one would have to change around the uniforms and medals and the like, even though I would almost like to see George V in his military uniform.

Tsar_Nicholas_II_%26_King_George_V.JPG

Not surprising as they were 1st cousins and grandsons of Queen Victoria.
 
Not surprising as they were 1st cousins and grandsons of Queen Victoria.

Yes, the caption on the image mentioned it, the monarchies were quite interrelated at the time.
 
Back
Top Bottom